Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of Zinc Sulphate and Organics on Zn Content and Yield of Chenopodium Grown in Different Soils

Agronomic Bio-fortification of Chenopodium with Zn

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Zinc (Zn) deficiency in humans is a widespread problem across the globe. Since, vegetables are the important constituent of daily diet, it is very useful to enrich leafy vegetables with Zn in alleviating Zn deficiency in humans. Greenhouse pot experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of applied Zn and organics on shoot Zn content and dry biomass yield of Chenopodium album grown in acid and alkaline soils. Zinc content increased significantly with increase in Zn level. Zinc content gets reduced to a great extent due to application of farmyard manure (FYM) and sludge in acid soil. As far as dry biomass yield is concerned, the crop responded positively to applied level of Zn @ 5 mg kg−1 in alkaline soil, while such response was conspicuously absent in acid soil. In case of alkaline soil, significant reduction in dry biomass yield occurred only at 100 mg Zn kg−1, whereas such reduction was recorded in acid soil even at 50 mg Zn kg−1. With reference to recommended dietary allowances of Zn for humans, substantial enrichment of Chenopodium in terms of Zn content is possible due to application of Zn from external sources. Taking health risk into consideration, applied rate of Zn may go up to 100 mg kg−1 for alkaline soil as against 50 mg kg−1 for acid soil in enriching Chenopodium with Zn.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Singh MV (2001) Evaluation of micronutrient status in different agro-ecological zones of India. Fert News 46:25–42

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hotz C, Brown KH (2004) Assessment of the risk of zinc deficiency in populations and options for its control. Food Nutr Bull 25:194–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gibson RS (2006) Zinc: the missing link in combating micronutrient malnutrition in developing countries. Proc Nutr Soc 65:51–60

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cakmak I (2008) Enrichment of cereal grains with zinc: agronomic or genetic biofortification? Plant Soil 302:1–17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rattan RK, Datta SP, Katyal JC (2008) Micronutrient management: research achievements and future challenges. Indian J Fert 4:103–106

    Google Scholar 

  6. Katyal JC, Rattan RK, Datta SP (2004) Management of zinc and boron for sustainable food production in India. Fert News 49:83–90

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mirshekali H, Hadi H, Amirnia R, Khodaverdiloo H (2012) Effect of zinc toxicity on plant productivity, chlorophyll and Zn contents of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) and common lambsquarter (Chenopodium album). Int J Agric 2:247–254

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sharma KD, Bindal G, Rathour R, Rana JC (2012) β-Carotene and mineral content of different Cenopodium species and the effect of cooking on micronutrient retention. Int J Food Sci Nutr 63:290–295

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Glowacka A (2012) Content and uptake of microelements (Cu, Zn, Mn, Fe) by maize (Zea mays L.) and accompanying weeds. Acta Agrobot 65:179–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gupta UC, Gupta SC (1998) Trace element toxicity relationships to crop production and livestock and human health: implications for management. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 29:1491–1522

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Jackson ML (1973) Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall of India Private Limited, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lindsay WL, Norvell WA (1978) Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese and copper. Soil Sci Soc Am J 42:421–428

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Snyder JD, Trofymow JA (1984) A rapid accurate wet oxidation diffusion procedure for determining organic and inorganic carbon in pot and soil samples. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 15:587–597

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. IRIS (2011) Integrated risk information system-database. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  15. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1967) Statistical methods, 7th edn. The Lowa State University Press, USA

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chaudhary M, Narwal NP (2005) Effect of long-term application of farmyard manure on soil micronutrient status. Arch Agron Soil Sci 51:351–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lal P (1990) Effects of sewage effluents and sludge on soil enzyme activity and heavy metal accumulation in soil and plants. Dissertation, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi

  18. Talatam S, Parida B (2009) Crop growth as affected by zinc and organic matter in cadmium rich polluted soils. In: Proceedings of the international plant nutrition colloquium XVI, Department of Plant Sciences, UC Davis

  19. Georgieva V, Tasev C, Senalevitch G (1997) Growth, yield, lead, Zn and Cd content of radish, pea and pepper plants as influenced by level of single and multiple contamination of soil III Cd. Bulg J Plant Physiol 23:12–23

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lindsay WL (1979) Chemical equilibria in soils. Willey Inter Sciences, New York

    Google Scholar 

  21. Narwal RP, Antil RS, Gupta AP (1992) Soil pollution through industrial effluents and waste management. J Soil Contam 1:265–272

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Brown SL, Henry CL, Chaney RL, Compton H, DeVolder PS (2003) Using municipal bio-solids in combination with other residuals to restore metal-contaminated mining areas. Plant Soil 249:203–215

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Vacha R, Podlesakova E, Nemecek J, Polacek O (2002) Immobilization of As, Cd, Pb and Zn in agricultural soils by the use of organic and inorganic additives. Rostl Vyr 48:335–342

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Grzetic I, Rabia H, Ghariani A (2008) Potential health risk assessment for soil heavy metal contamination in the central zone of Belgrade (Serbia). J Serb Chem Soc 73:923–934

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Alam MGM, Snow ET, Tanaka A (2003) Arsenic and heavy metal contamination of vegetables grown in Samta village, Bangladesh. Sci Total Environ 308:83–96

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Authors would like to place on record their sincere thanks to Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), New Delhi, India for providing the necessary funding and laboratory facilities required for conducting the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Siba Prasad Datta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ray, P., Singhal, S.K., Datta, S.P. et al. Effect of Zinc Sulphate and Organics on Zn Content and Yield of Chenopodium Grown in Different Soils. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., India, Sect. B Biol. Sci. 87, 697–704 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-015-0649-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-015-0649-z

Keywords

Navigation