Skip to main content
Log in

Basophil activation testing in diagnosis and monitoring of allergic disease – an overview

  • Übersicht
  • Published:
Allergo Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The nature of basophil activation as an ex vivo challenge makes it a multifaceted and promising tool for the allergist. Through the development of flow cytometry, discovery of activation markers such as CD63 and markers identifying basophil granulocytes, the basophil activation test (BAT) has become a pervasive test. BAT measures basophil response to allergen crosslinking IgE on between 150 and 2,000 basophil granulocytes with remarkable analytical sensitivity in < 0.1 ml fresh blood. Dichotomous activation is assessed as the fraction of reacting basophils. In patients with food-, insect venom-, and drug allergy and patients with chronic urticaria BAT can be part of the diagnostic evaluation in addition to history, skin prick testing, and specific IgE determination. BAT may also be helpful in determining the clinically relevant allergen. Basophil sensitivity may be used to monitor patients on allergen immunotherapy, anti-IgE treatment, or in the natural resolution of allergy. The test may use fewer resources and be more reproducible than oral, sting, nasal or bronchial challenge testing. BAT may be useful before challenge testing as it is less stressful for the patient and avoids severe allergic reactions. It may be useful before challenge testing. An important next step is to standardize BAT and make it available in diagnostic laboratories. This article provides an overview of the practical and technical details as well as the utility of BAT in diagnosis and management of allergic diseases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AIT:

Allergen-specific immunotherapy ASST Autologous serum skin test

BAT:

Basophil activation test

CU:

Chronic spontaneous urticaria

DHR:

Drug hypersensitivity reactions

FcεRI:

High affinity IgE-receptor

IL-3:

Interleukin-3

NMBA:

Neuromuscular blocking agent

sIgE:

Specific IgE

SPT:

Skin prick test

VIT:

Venom immunotherapy

References

  1. Knol EF, Mul FP, Jansen H, Calafat J, Roos D. Monitoring human basophil activation via CD63 monoclonal antibody 435. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1991;88:328–338

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sainte-Laudy J, Vallon C, Guérin JC. Analysis of membrane expression of the CD63 human basophil activation marker. Applications to allergologic diagnosis. Allerg Immunol (Leipz) 1994;26:211–214

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hoffmann HJ, Santos AF, Mayorga C, Nopp A, Eberlein B, Ferrer M, et al. The clinical utility of basophil activation testing in diagnosis and monitoring of allergic disease. Allergy 2015;70:1393–405

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sturm EM, Kranzelbinder B, Heinemann A, Groselj-Strele A, Aberer W, Sturm GJ. CD203c-based basophil activation test in allergy diagnosis: characteristics and differences to CD63 upregulation. Cytometry B Clin Cytom 2010;78:308–318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Iqbal K, Bhargava K, Skov PS, Falkencrone S, Grattan CE. A positive serum basophil histamine release assay is a marker for ciclosporin-responsiveness in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria. Clin Transl Allergy 2012;2:19

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Kvedariene V, Kamey S, Ryckwaert Y, Rongier M, Bousquet J, Demoly P, et al. Diagnosis of neuromuscular blocking agent hypersensitivity reactions using cytofluorimetric analysis of basophils. Allergy 2006;61:311–315

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fernández TD, Torres MJ, Blanca-López N, Rodríguez-Bada JL, Gomez E, Canto G, et al. Negativization rates of IgE radioimmunoassay and basophil activation test in immediate reactions to penicillins. Allergy 2009;64:242–248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sousa N, Martínez-Aranguren R, Fernández-Benitez M, Ribeiro F, Sanz ML. Comparison of basophil activation test results in blood preserved in acid citrate dextrose and EDTA. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2010;20:535–536

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ando N, Nakamura Y, Ishimaru K, Ogawa H, Okumura K, Shimada S, et al. Allergen-specific basophil reactivity exhibits daily variations in seasonal allergic rhinitis. Allergy 2015;70:319–322

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gentinetta T, Pecaric-Petkovic T, Wan D, Falcone FH, Dahinden CA, Pichler WJ, et al. Individual IL-3 priming is crucial for consistent in vitro activation of donor basophils in patients with chronic urticaria. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2011;128:1227–1234.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bühring H-J, Streble A, Valent P. The basophil-specific ectoenzyme E-NPP3 (CD203c) as a marker for cell activation and allergy diagnosis. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2004;133:317–329

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. De Weck AL, Sanz ML, Gamboa PM, Aberer W, Bienvenu J, Blanca M, et al. Diagnostic tests based on human basophils: more potentials and perspectives than pitfalls. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2008;146:177–189

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sturm GJ, Böhm E, Trummer M, Weiglhofer I, Heinemann A, Aberer W. The CD63 basophil activation test in Hymenoptera venom allergy: a prospective study. Allergy 2004;59:1110–1117

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Erdmann SM, Sachs B, Kwiecien R, Moll-Slodowy S, Sauer I, Merk HF. The basophil activation test in wasp venom allergy: sensitivity, specificity and monitoring specific immunotherapy. Allergy 2004;59:1102–1109

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Eberlein-König B, Varga R, Mempel M, Darsow U, Behrendt H, Ring J. Comparison of basophil activation tests using CD63 or CD203c expression in patients with insect venom allergy. Allergy 2006;61:1084–1085

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ocmant A, Peignois Y, Mulier S, Hanssens L, Michils A, Schandené L. Flow cytometry for basophil activation markers: the measurement of CD203c up-regulation is as reliable as CD63 expression in the diagnosis of cat allergy. J Immunol Methods 2007;320:40–48

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hausmann OV, Gentinetta T, Fux M, Ducrest S, Pichler WJ, Dahinden CA. Robust expression of CCR3 as a single basophil selection marker in flow cytometry. Allergy 2011;66:85–91

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Johansson SGO, Nopp A, van Hage M, Olofsson N, Lundahl J, Wehlin L, et al. Passive IgE-sensitization by blood transfusion. Allergy 2005;60:1192–1199.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schmid JM, Würtzen PA, Dahl R, Hoffmann HJ. Early improvement in basophil sensitivity predicts symptom relief with grass pollen immunotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2014; 134: 741–744

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nopp A, Cardell LO, Johansson SGO, Oman H. CD-sens: a biological measure of immunological changes stimulated by ASIT. Allergy 2009;64:811–814

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Patil SU, Shreffler WG. Immunology in the Clinic Review Series; focus on allergies: basophils as biomarkers for assessing immune modulation. Clin Exp Immunol 2012;167:59–66

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Konstantinou GN, Asero R, Ferrer M, Knol EF, Maurer M, Raap U, et al. EAACI taskforce position paper: evidence for autoimmune urticaria and proposal for defining diagnostic criteria. Allergy 2013;68:27–36

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wedi B, Novacovic V, Koerner M, Kapp A. Chronic urticaria serum induces histamine release, leukotriene production, and basophil CD63 surface expression—inhibitory effects of anti-inflammatory drugs. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2000;105:552–560

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yasnowsky KM, Dreskin SC, Efaw B, Schoen D, Vedanthan PK, Alam R, et al. Chronic urticaria sera increase basophil CD203c expression. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2006;117:1430–1434

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mayorga C, Sanz ML, Gamboa PM, García BE, Caballero MT, García JM, et al. In vitro diagnosis of immediate allergic reactions to drugs: an update. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2010;20:103–109

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hausmann OV, Gentinetta T, Bridts CH, Ebo DG. The basophil activation test in immediate-type drug allergy. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am 2009;29:555–566

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ocmant A, Mulier S, Hanssens L, Goldman M, Casimir G, Mascart F, et al. Basophil activation tests for the diagnosis of food allergy in children. Clin Exp Allergy J Br Soc Allergy Clin Immunol 2009;39:1234–1245

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Rubio A, Vivinus-Nébot M, Bourrier T, Saggio B, Albertini M, Bernard A. Benefit of the basophil activation test in deciding when to reintroduce cow’s milk in allergic children. Allergy 2011;66:92–100

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Santos AF, Douiri A, Bécares N, Wu S-Y, Stephens A, Radulovic S et al. Basophil activation test discriminates between allergy and tolerance in peanut-sensitized children. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2015 Jan;135(1):179–86. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.09.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Santos AF, Du Toit G, Douiri A, Radulovic S, Stephens A, Turcanu V, et al. Distinct parameters of the basophil activation test reflect the severity and threshold of allergic reactions to peanut. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2015;135:179–186

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Gernez Y, Tirouvanziam R, Yu G, Ghosn EEB, Reshamwala N, Nguyen T, et al. Basophil CD203c levels are increased at baseline and can be used to monitor omalizumab treatment in subjects with nut allergy. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2011;154:318–327

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Korošec P, Šilar M, Eržen R, Celesnik N, Bajrovic N, Zidarn M, et al. Clinical routine utility of basophil activation testing for diagnosis of hymenoptera-allergic patients with emphasis on individuals with negative venom-specific IgE antibodies. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2013;161:363–368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sturm GJ, Jin C, Kranzelbinder B, Hemmer W, Sturm EM, Griesbacher A, et al. Inconsistent results of diagnostic tools hamper the differentiation between bee and vespid venom allergy. PloS One 2011;6:e20842

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Eberlein B, Krischan L, Darsow U, Ollert M, Ring J. Double positivity to bee and wasp venom: Improved diagnostic procedure by recombinant allergen-based IgE testing and basophil activation test including data about cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2012; 130: 155–161

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Eržen R, Košnik M, Silar M, Korošec P. Basophil response and the induction of a tolerance in venom immunotherapy: a long-term sting challenge study. Allergy 2012;67:822–830

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kosnik M, Silar M, Bajrovic N, Music E, Korosec P. High sensitivity of basophils predicts side-effects in venom immunotherapy. Allergy 2005;60:1401–1406

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Gómez E, Campo P, Rondón C, Barrionuevo E, Blanca-López N, Torres MJ et al. Role of the basophil activation test in the diagnosis of local allergic rhinitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2013;132:975–976

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Nopp A, Johansson SGO, Ankerst J, Bylin G, Cardell LO, Grönneberg R et al. Basophil allergen threshold sensitivity: a useful approach to anti-IgE treatment efficacy evaluation. Allergy 2006;61:298–302

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Dahlén B, Nopp A, Johansson SGO, Eduards M, Skedinger M, Adédoyin J. Basophil allergen threshold sensitivity, CD-sens, is a measure of allergen sensitivity in asthma. Clin Exp Allergy 2011;41:1091–1097

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Johansson SGO, Nopp A, Oman H, Ankerst J, Cardell LO, Grönneberg R et al. The size of the disease relevant IgE antibody fraction in relation to’ total-IgE’ predicts the efficacy of anti-IgE (Xolair) treatment. Allergy 2009;64:1472–1477

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernadette Eberlein.

Additional information

Interessenkonflikt

Eberlein B, Santos AF, Patil SU, Shreffler WG, and Hausmann OV obtained research funding and Eberlein B and Hausmann OV received speaker honoraria from Bühlmann Laboratories, Schoenenbuch, Switzerland. Eberlein B received research funding from BD Biosciences, Erembodegem, Belgium. Nopp A received research funding from Novartis, Basel, Switzerland. Hoffmann HJ, Mayorga C, Ferrer M, Rouzaire P, Ebo D, Sabato V, Sanz ML, Pecaric-Petkovic T, Korosec P, and Knol EF confirm that there are no conflicts of interest.

Zitierweise

Eberlein B, Santos AF, Mayorga C, Nopp A, Ferrer M, Rouzaire P, Ebo D, Sabato V, Sanz ML, Pecaric-Petkovic T, Patil SU, Hausmann OV, Shreffler WG, Korosec P, Knol EF, Hoffmann HJ. Basophil activation testing in diagnosis and monitoring of allergic disease —s an overview. Allergo J Int 2016;25:106–13 DOI: 10.1007/s40629-016-0113-5

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eberlein, B., Santos, A.F., Mayorga, C. et al. Basophil activation testing in diagnosis and monitoring of allergic disease – an overview. Allergo J 25, 26–33 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s15007-016-1105-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s15007-016-1105-y

Key words

Navigation