Skip to main content
Log in

Three-Dimensional Spheroid Culture Increases Exosome Secretion from Mesenchymal Stem Cells

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Aims and scope

Abstract

Background:

Mass production of exosomes is a prerequisite for their commercial utilization. This study investigated whether three-dimensional (3D) spheroid culture of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) could improve the production efficiency of exosomes and if so, what was the mechanism involved.

Methods:

We adopted two models of 3D spheroid culture using the hanging-drop (3D-HD) and poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (poly-HEMA) coating methods (3D-PH). The efficiency of exosome production from MSCs in the 3D spheroids was compared with that of monolayer culture in various conditions. We then investigated the mechanism of the 3D spheroid culture-induced increase in exosome production.

Results:

The 3D-HD formed a single larger spheroid, while the 3D-PH formed multiple smaller ones. However, MSCs cultured on both types of spheroids produced significantly more exosomes than those cultured in conventional monolayer culture (2D). We then investigated the cause of the increased exosome production in terms of hypoxia within the 3D spheroids, high cell density, and non-adherent cell morphology. With increasing spheroid size, the efficiency of exosome production was the largest with the least amount of cells in both 3D-HD and 3D-PH. An increase in cell density in 2D culture (2D-H) was less efficient in exosome production than the conventional, lower cell density, 2D culture. Finally, when cells were plated at normal density on the poly-HEMA coated spheroids (3D-N-PH); they formed small aggregates of less than 10 cells and still produced more exosomes than those in the 2D culture when plated at the same density. We also found that the expression of F-actin was markedly reduced in the 3D-N-PH culture.

Conclusion:

These results suggested that 3D spheroid culture produces more exosomes than 2D culture and the non-adherent round cell morphology itself might be a causative factor. The result of the present study could provide useful information to develop an optimal process for the mass production of exosomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kim N, Cho SG. Clinical applications of mesenchymal stem cells. Korean J Intern Med. 2013;28:387–402.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Labusca L, O’Brien M, Mashayekhi K. A clinical perspective to mesenchymal stem cell-based musculoskeletal regeneration. OA Musculoskelet Med. 2013;1:8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Miao Z, Sun H, Xue Y. Isolation and characterization of human chorionic membranes mesenchymal stem cells and their neural differentiation. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2017;14:143–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Khalilpourfarshbafi M, Hajiaghaalipour F, Selvarajan KK, Adam A. Mesenchymal stem cell-based therapies against podocyte damage in diabetic nephropathy. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2017;14:201–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yu B, Zhang X, Li X. Exosomes derived from mesenchymal stem cells. Int J Mol Sci. 2014;15:4142–57.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lai RC, Arslan F, Lee MM, Sze NS, Choo A, Chen TS, et al. Exosome secreted by MSC reduces myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury. Stem Cell Res. 2010;4:214–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Valadi H, Ekström K, Bossios A, Sjöstrand M, Lee JJ, Lötvall JO. Exosome-mediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells. Nat Cell Biol. 2007;9:654–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kosaka N, Iguchi H, Yoshioka Y, Takeshita F, Matsuki Y, Ochiya T. Secretory mechanisms and intercellular transfer of microRNAs in living cells. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:17442–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Eldh M, Ekström K, Valadi H, Sjöstrand M, Olsson B, Jernås M, et al. Exosomes communicate protective messages during oxidative stress; possible role of exosomal shuttle RNA. PLoS One. 2010;5:e15353.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Phinney DG, Pittenger MF. Concise review: MSC-derived exosomes for cell-free therapy. Stem Cells. 2017;35:851–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Yeo RWY, Lai RC, Tan KH, Lim SK. Exosome: a novel and safer therapeutic refinement of mesenchymal stem cell. J Circ Biomark. 2013. https://doi.org/10.5772/57460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Vlassov AV, Magdaleno S, Setterquist R, Conrad R. Exosomes: current knowledge of their composition, biological functions, and diagnostic and therapeutic potentials. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1820:940–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang B, Yao K, Huuskes BM, Shen HH, Zhuang J, Godson C, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells deliver exogenous microRNA-let7c via exosomes to attenuate renal fibrosis. Mol Ther. 2016;24:1290–301.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Li T, Yan Y, Wang B, Qian H, Zhang X, Shen L, et al. Exosomes derived from human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells alleviate liver fibrosis. Stem Cells Dev. 2013;22:845–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nakamura Y, Miyaki S, Ishitobi H, Matsuyama S, Nakasa T, Kamei N, et al. Mesenchymal-stem-cell-derived exosomes accelerate skeletal muscle regeneration. FEBS Lett. 2015;589:1257–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang S, Chu W, Lai RC, Lim SK, Hui JH, Toh WS. Exosomes derived from human embryonic mesenchymal stem cells promote osteochondral regeneration. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2016;24:2135–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang S, Chuah SJ, Lai RC, Hui JHP, Lim SK, Toh WS. MSC exosomes mediate cartilage repair by enhancing proliferation, attenuating apoptosis and modulating immune reactivity. Biomaterials. 2018;156:16–27.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Savina A, Fader CM, Damiani MT, Colombo MI. Rab11 promotes docking and fusion of multivesicular bodies in a calcium-dependent manner. Traffic. 2005;6:131–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Salomon C, Ryan J, Sobrevia L, Kobayashi M, Ashman K, Mitchell M, et al. Exosomal signaling during hypoxia mediates microvascular endothelial cell migration and vasculogenesis. PLoS One. 2013;8:e68451.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Savina A, Furlán M, Vidal M, Colombo MI. Exosome release is regulated by a calcium-dependent mechanism in K562 cells. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:20083–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kato T, Miyaki S, Ishitobi H, Nakamura Y, Nakasa T, Lotz MK, et al. Exosomes from IL-1β stimulated synovial fibroblasts induce osteoarthritic changes in articular chondrocytes. Arthritis Res Ther. 2014;16:R163.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Ti D, Hao H, Tong C, Liu J, Dong L, Zheng J, et al. LPS-preconditioned mesenchymal stromal cells modify macrophage polarization for resolution of chronic inflammation via exosome-shuttled let-7b. J Transl Med. 2015;13:308.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. McKee C, Chaudhry GR. Advances and challenges in stem cell culture. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2017;159:62–77.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Frith JE, Thomson B, Genever PG. Dynamic three-dimensional culture methods enhance mesenchymal stem cell properties and increase therapeutic potential. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2010;16:735–49.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Guo L, Ge J, Zhou Y, Wang S, Zhao RC, Wu Y. Three-dimensional spheroid-cultured mesenchymal stem cells devoid of embolism attenuate brain stroke injury after intra-arterial injection. Stem Cells Dev. 2014;23:978–89.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Santos JM, Camões SP, Filipe E, Cipriano M, Barcia RN, Filipe M, et al. Three-dimensional spheroid cell culture of umbilical cord tissue-derived mesenchymal stromal cells leads to enhanced paracrine induction of wound healing. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2015;6:90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bartosh TJ, Ylöstalo JH, Mohammadipoor A, Bazhanov N, Coble K, Claypool K, et al. Aggregation of human mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) into 3D spheroids enhances their antiinflammatory properties. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:13724–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Potapova IA, Gaudette GR, Brink PR, Robinson RB, Rosen MR, Cohen IS, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells support migration, extracellular matrix invasion, proliferation, and survival of endothelial cells in vitro. Stem Cells. 2007;25:1761–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ylöstalo JH, Bartosh TJ, Coble K, Prockop DJ. Human mesenchymal stem/stromal cells cultured as spheroids are self-activated to produce prostaglandin E2 that directs stimulated macrophages into an anti-inflammatory phenotype. Stem Cells. 2012;30:2283–96.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Guo L, Zhou Y, Wang S, Wu Y. Epigenetic changes of mesenchymal stem cells in three-dimensional (3D) spheroids. J Cell Mol Med. 2014;18:2009–19.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kim M, Kim J, Park SR, Park DY, Kim YJ, Choi BH, et al. Comparison of fetal cartilage-derived progenitor cells isolated at different developmental stages in a rat model. Dev Growth Differ. 2016;58:167–79.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Lin RZ, Chang HY. Recent advances in three-dimensional multicellular spheroid culture for biomedical research. Biotechnol J. 2008;3:1172–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Sart S, Tsai AC, Li Y, Ma T. Three-dimensional aggregates of mesenchymal stem cells: cellular mechanisms, biological properties, and applications. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2014;20:365–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. King HW, Michael MZ, Gleadle JM. Hypoxic enhancement of exosome release by breast cancer cells. BMC Cancer. 2012;12:421.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Sart S, Ma T, Li Y. Preconditioning stem cells for in vivo delivery. Biores Open Access. 2014;3:137–49.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhou Y, Chen H, Li H, Wu Y. 3D culture increases pluripotent gene expression in mesenchymal stem cells through relaxation of cytoskeleton tension. J Cell Mol Med. 2017;21:1073–84.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Aunis D, Bader MF. The cytoskeleton as a barrier to exocytosis in secretory cells. J Exp Biol. 1988;139:253–66.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Alimperti S, Lei P, Wen Y, Tian J, Campbell AM, Andreadis ST. Serum-free spheroid suspension culture maintains mesenchymal stem cell proliferation and differentiation potential. Biotechnol Prog. 2014;30:974–83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by a grant from the Korea Health Technology R&D Project funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (HI17C2191).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Byung Hyune Choi or Byoung-Hyun Min.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Ethical statement

There are no animal experiments carried out for this article.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Figure S1

Comparison of the amount of exosomes secreted from hBM-MSCs primed with various stimuli. hBM-MSCs were cultured in monolayer at normal density (2D) and were untreated (Control) or treated respectively with IL-1β, TNF-α, Poly I:C, and 3D-HD. The amounts of exosomes obtained from 1 × 105 cells are presented for each group at 3 days of culture. Data are presented as the mean and SD from three independent experiments. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001 by one-way ANOVA. 3D, three-dimensional; hBM-MSCs; human bone marrow-mesenchymal stem cells; 2D, two-dimensional; 3D-HD, 3D spheroids formed by the hanging drop method; ANOVA, analysis of variance; IL-1β, interleukin 1 beta; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor alpha; Poly I:C, polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid. (JPEG 123 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, M., Yun, HW., Park, D.Y. et al. Three-Dimensional Spheroid Culture Increases Exosome Secretion from Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Tissue Eng Regen Med 15, 427–436 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13770-018-0139-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13770-018-0139-5

Keywords

Navigation