We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Skip to main content
Log in

Stochastic user equilibrium in the presence of state dependence

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics

Abstract

We consider the following two state-dependent effects at the level of route choice: inertia to change and, as a consequence of experience, lower perception variance for the currently used route. A heteroscedastic extreme value model embodying heterogeneity across alternatives in the mean of the random terms is used. Estimations based on stated preference data confirm the presence of both state-dependent effects. We introduce a new class of stochastic user equilibrium (SUE) models that take state-dependent effects into account. The class includes conventional SUE as special case. The equilibrium conditions are formulated as fixed-point states of deterministic day-to-day assignment processes. At the equilibrium (1) no user can improve her/his utility by unilaterally changing route, and (2) if each user shifts from her/his current route to her/his newly chosen route the observed route flows do not change. The existence of the equilibrium is guaranteed under usually satisfied conditions. A modified method of successive averages is proposed for solution. Examples related to a two arc network and to the Nguyen-Dupuis network illustrate the model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahipaşaoğlu SD, Li X, Natarajan K (2013) A convex optimization approach for computing choice probabilities with many alternatives. Technical Report

  • Ahipaşaoğlu SD, Meskarian R, Magnanti TL, Natarajan K (2015) Beyond normality: a cross moment stochastic user equilibrium model. Transp Res Part B 81(2):335–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahipaşaoğlu SD, Arikan U, Natarajan K (2016) On the flexibility of using marginal distribution choice models in traffic equilibrium. Transp Res Part B 91:130–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekhor S, Prashker JN (1999) Formulations of extended logit stochastic user equilibrium assignments. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory, pp 351–372

  • Bekhor S, Prashker JN (2001) A stochastic user equilibrium formulation for the generalised nested logit model. Transp Res Rec 1752:84–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekhor S, Toledo T (2005) Investigating path-based solution algorithms to the stochastic user equilibrium problem. Transp Res Part B 39(3):279–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekhor S, Chorus C, Toledo T (2012) Stochastic user equilibrium for route choice model based on random regret minimization. Transp Res Rec 2284:100–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Akiva M, Bierlaire M (1999) Discrete choice methods and their applications to short-term travel decisions. Handbook of Transportation Science. Int Ser Oper Res Manag Sci 23:5–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhat C (1995) A heteroscedastic extreme value model of intercity travel mode choice. Transp Res Part B 29(6):471–483

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantarella GE (1993) Day-to-day dynamics in transportation networks: stability and limits of equilibrium in a two-link network. Sistemi Urbani 1:27–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantarella GE, Cascetta E (1995) Dynamic processes and equilibrium in transportation networks: towards a unifying theory. Transp Sci 29(4):305–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantarella GE, Velonà P (2010) Assegnazioni a Reti di Trasporto. Modelli di Punto Fisso. In Italian: Transport Network Assignment: Fixed-Point Models. Franco Angeli, Milano

  • Cantarella GE, Watling D (2016) Modelling road traffic assignment as a day-to-day dynamic, deterministic process: a unified approach to discrete- and continuous-time models. EURO J Transp Logist 5:69–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantillo V, De Dios Ortúzar J, Williams HCWL (2007) Modeling discrete choices in the presence of inertia and serial correlation. Transp Sci 41(2):195–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Cascetta E (2009) Transportation systems analysis. models and applications. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cascetta E, Cantarella GE (1991) A day-to-day and within day dynamic stochastic assignment model. Transp Res Part A 25(5):277–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Cascetta E, Nuzzolo A, Russo F, Vitetta A (1996) A modified logit route choice model overcoming path overlapping problems: specification and some calibration results for interurban networks. In: Lesort JB (ed) Proceedings of the International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory, Lyon, pp 697–711

  • Castillo E, Menéndez JM, Jiménez A, Rivas P (2008) Closed form expressions for choice probabilities in the Weibull case. Transp Res Part B 42(4):373–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen A, Pravinvongvuth S, Xu X, Ryu S, Chootinan P (2012) Examining the scaling effect and overlapping problem in logit-based stochastic user equilibrium models. Transp Res Part A 46(8):1343–1358

    Google Scholar 

  • Chorus CG (2010) A new model of random regret minimization. Eur J Transp Infrastruct Res 10(2):181–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Chorus CG (2012) Random regret minimization: an overview of model properties and empirical evidence. Transp Rev 32(1):75–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu C (1989) A pair combinatorial logit model for travel demand analysis. In: Proceedings of the Fifth World Conference on Transportation Research, vol 4, pp 295–309

  • Daganzo C, Sheffi Y (1977) On stochastic models of traffic assignment. Transp Sci 11(3):253–274

    Google Scholar 

  • De Borger B, Fosgerau M (2008) The trade-off between money and travel time: a test of the theory of reference-dependent preferences. J Urban Econ 64(1):101–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Delle Site P (2017) On the equivalence between SUE and fixed-point states of day-to-day assignment processes with serially-correlated route choice. Netw Spat Econ 17(3):935–962

    Google Scholar 

  • Delle Site P, Filippi F (2011) Stochastic user equilibrium and value of time analysis with reference-dependent route choice. Eur J Transp Infrastruct Res 11(2):194–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Delle Site P, Filippi F, Castaldi C (2013) Reference-dependent stochastic user equilibrium with endogenous reference points. Eur J Transp Infrastruct Res 13(2):147–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisk C (1980) Some developments in equilibrium traffic assignment. Transp Res Part B 14(3):243–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Galor O (2010) Discrete dynamical systems. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Gliebe JP, Koppelman FS, Ziliaskopoulos A (1999) Route choice using a pair combinatorial logit model. In: Presented at the 78th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board

  • Hess S, Rose JM, Hensher DA (2008) Asymmetric preference formation in willingness to pay estimates in discrete choice models. Transp Res Part E 44(5):847–863

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz JL (1984) The stability of stochastic equilibrium in a two-link transportation network. Transp Res Part B 18(1):13–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitthamkesorn S, Chen A (2013) A path-size weibit stochastic user equilibrium model. Transp Res Part B 57:378–397

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Q, Liao F, Timmermans HJP, Zhou J (2016) A reference-dependent user equilibrium model for activity travel scheduling. Transportation 43(6):1061–1077

    Google Scholar 

  • Lo HK, Watling DP, Cantarella GE (eds) (2016) Special issue: day-to-day dynamics in transportation networks. Transportation Research Part B, vol 92, pp 1–118

  • Maher MJ, Hughes PC (1997) A probit-based stochastic user equilibrium assignment model. Transp Res Part B 31(4):341–355

    Google Scholar 

  • McFaddden D (1978) Modeling the choice of residential location. In: Karlqvist A, Lundqvist L, Snickars F, Weibull J (eds) Spatial Interaction Theory and Planning Models. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 75–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra VK, Natarajan K, Hua T, Teo C-P (2012) Choice prediction with semidefinite optimization when utilities are correlated. IEEE Trans Autom Control 57(10):2450–2463

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra VK, Natarajan K, Padmanabhan D, Teo C-P, Li X (2014) On theoretical and empirical aspects of marginal distribution choice models. Manag Sci 60(6):1511–1531

    Google Scholar 

  • Natarajan K, Song M, Teo C-P (2009) Persistency model and its applications in choice modeling. Manage Sci 55(3):453–469

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen S, Dupuis C (1984) An efficient method for computing traffic equilibria in networks with asymmetric transportation costs. Transp Sci 18(2):185–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker TS, Chua LO (1989) Practical numerical algorithms for chaotic systems. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell WB, Sheffi Y (1982) The convergence of equilibrium algorithms with predetermined step sizes. Transp Sci 16(1):45–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Prato CG (2009) Route choice modeling: past, present and future research directions. J Choice Modell 2(1):65–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Pravinvongvuth S, Chen A (2005) Adaptation of the pair combinatorial logit model to the route choice problem. Transportmetrica 1(3):223–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Press WH, Flannery BP, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT (1986) Numerical Recipes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabinowitz P, Weiss G (1959) Tables of abscissas and weights for numerical evaluation of integrals of the form \( \mathop \int \limits_{0}^{\infty } e^{{ - x}} x^{n} f\left( x \right)dx \). Math Tables Aids Comput 13:285–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheffi Y (1985) Urban transportation networks: equilibrium analysis with mathematical programming methods. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan KK, Mahmassani HS (2000) Modeling inertia and compliance mechanisms in route choice behavior under real-time information. Transp Res Rec 1725:45–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Train KE (2003) Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Tverski A, Kahneman D (1991) Loss aversion in riskless choice: a reference-dependent model. Q J Econ 106(4):1039–1061

    Google Scholar 

  • Vovsha P (1997) Application of cross-nested logit model in Tel Aviv, Israel, Metropolitan Area. Transp Res Rec 1607:6–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Vovsha P, Bekhor S (1999) Link-nested logit model of route choice: overcoming the route overlapping problem. Transp Res Rec 1645:133–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardrop J (1952) Some theoretical aspects of road traffic research. Proc Inst Civ Eng Part II 1:325–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Wen CH, Koppelman FS (2001) The generalized nested logit model. Transp Res Part B 35(7):627–641

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie C, Liu Z (2014) On the stochastic network equilibrium with heterogeneous choice inertia. Transp Res Part B 66:90–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu H, Lou Y, Yin Y, Zhou J (2011) A prospect-based user equilibrium model with endogenous reference points and its application in congestion pricing. Transp Res Part B 45(2):311–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu X, Chen A, Kitthamkesorn S, Yang H, Lo HK (2015) Modeling absolute and relative cost differences in stochastic user equilibrium problem. Transp Res Part B 81:686–703

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Z, Chen A, Bekhor S (2012) C-logit stochastic user equilibrium model: formulation and solution algorithm. Transportmetrica 8(1):17–41

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paolo Delle Site.

Appendix

Appendix

1.1 Notation

The following notation (in alphabetical order) is used. The symbols are, wherever possible, self-explaining because based on the initials of the associated quantity. Quantities (flows and travel times) that are related to arcs are lowercase, quantities that are related to routes are uppercase.

a:

Arc

A:

Arc set

Ca:

Capacity of arc

dw:

Demand of OD pair \( w \)

\( f_{a} \):

Flow of arc \( a \)

\( F_{r}^{w} \):

Flow of route \( r \) of OD pair w

\( {\mathbf{F}} \):

Vector of route flows

\( k \):

Iteration counter

\( I_{r\left| j \right.}^{w} \):

Indicator function related to the identity of route \( r \) at day \( n \) and route \( j \) the day before for OD pair w

\( j \):

Route

\( M_{r}^{w} \):

Monetary cost of route \( r \) of OD pair \( w \)

\( n \):

Day

\( P_{r\left| j \right.}^{w(n)} \):

Conditional probability of choosing route \( r \) at day \( n \) having chosen route \( j \) the day before for OD pair \( w \)

\( r \):

Route

\( R^{w} \):

Route set of OD pair \( w \)

\( t_{a}^{(n)} \):

Travel time of arc \( a \) at day \( n \)

\( t_{a}^{0} \):

Free-flow travel time of arc \( a \)

\( T_{r}^{w(n)} \):

Travel time of route \( r \) of OD pair \( w \) at day \( n \)

\( V_{r\left| j \right.}^{w(n)} \):

Conditional systematic utility of route \( r \) of OD pair \( w \) at day \( n \) having chosen route \( j \) the day before

\( w \):

OD pair

\( W \):

OD pair set

\( \beta_{T} \):

Estimation coefficient of route travel time

\( \beta_{M} \):

Estimation coefficient of route monetary cost

\( \gamma \):

Algorithm convergence tolerance

\( \delta_{a,r}^{w} \):

Entry of the arc-route incidence matrix

\( \eta \):

Estimation coefficient of the inertia term

\( \theta \):

Scale parameter of the route chosen the day before

\( \lambda \):

Eigenvalue of the Jacobian, computed in the fixed point, of the transition functions

\( {\varvec{\Psi}} \):

Route-flow based fixed-point map

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Castaldi, C., Delle Site, P. & Filippi, F. Stochastic user equilibrium in the presence of state dependence. EURO J Transp Logist 8, 535–559 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13676-018-0135-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13676-018-0135-x

Keywords

Navigation