Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of Casting Speed on Thin Gauge Foil Surface Quality of 8079 Aluminum Alloy Produced by Twin Roll Casting Method

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In twin roll casting method, casted strips exhibit centerline segregation due to solidification kinetics. Casting parameters have an essential impact on aluminum’s microstructural properties as segregations. Therefore, these parameters have unfavorable effects on strip and foil products. Moreover, in foil products, pinhole surface defects do exist and reveal themselves as undesirable quality problems. In the present study, 8079 aluminum alloys were produced by twin roll casting method at different casting speeds. Diversified homogenization annealing processes were applied in laboratories for indicating optimum temperature leading to microstructural alterations. In order to analyze the influence of casting speed on foil products, microstructural investigations were accomplished on as-cast specimens and homogenized samples with optical microscope and scanning electron microscope. EDS and XRD analysis were conducted to analyze intermetallic structure inside 8079 alloy. In addition, mechanical tests were carried out for indicating the required temper designation for foil product. Scanning electron microscope analysis was performed on the final product surfaces of thin gauge foil in order to characterize the pinhole surface defect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Keles O, and Dundar M, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 186 (2007) 125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lentz M, Laptyeva G, and Engler O, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 660 (2016) 276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sun K M, Li L, Chen S D, Xu G M, Chen G, Misra R D K, and Zhang G, Materials Letters 190 (2017) 205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu W C, Zhai T, and Morris J G, Material Science and Engineering: A 358 (2003) 84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Işıksaçan C, Günyüz M, Birbaşar O, Konya C, and Dündar M, Materials Science Forum 794796 (2014) 181.

  6. Zhu H, Ghosh A K, and Maruyama K, Materials Science and Engineering: A 419 (2006) 115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kumar S, Babu N H, Scamans G M, Fan Z, and O’Reilly K A Q, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A 45 (2014) 2842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Schmidt C W, Mortensen D, and Karhausen K, Light Metals 2017 (2017) 811.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hasenclever J, in Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Aluminium Alloys. (2004), p 867.

  10. Delijic K, Asanovic V, and Radonjic D, Materials Science Forum 555 (2007) 559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Birol Y, Engineering Failure Analysis 28 (2013) 82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sanders R E, JOM 64 (2012) 291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang H, Zhou L, Zhang Y, Cai Y, and Zhang J, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 233 (2016), 186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lv Z, Du F, An Z, Huang H, Xu Z, and Sun J, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 643 (2015) 270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kumar R, Gupta A, Kumar A, Chouhan R N, and Khatirkar R K, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 742 (2018) 369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang J, Zhou X, Thompson G E, Hunter J A, and Yuan Y, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions 46A (2015) 2688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Merchant H D, Morris J G, and Hodgson D S, Mater. Charact. 25 (1990) 339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu J T, Banovic S W, Fields R J, and Morris J G, Metallurgical. Mater. Trans. A 37 (2006) 1887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Birol Y, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 202 (2008) 564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Polmear, StJohn D, Nie J, and Qian M, Light Alloys: Metallurgy of the Light Metals, 5th Edn. (Elsevier, 2017), p 246.

  21. Shakiba M, Parson N, and Chen X G, Materials Science & Engineering A 619 (2014) 180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Işıksaçan C, Meydanoğlu O, Akdoğan V U, Alper G, and Beyhan B, Light Metals 2015 (2015) 1219.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sanders R E, Hollinshead P A, Simielli E A, Materials Forum 28 (2004) 53.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Ulas Malcioglu.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Malcioglu, A.U., Dogan, C., Inel, C. et al. Effects of Casting Speed on Thin Gauge Foil Surface Quality of 8079 Aluminum Alloy Produced by Twin Roll Casting Method. Trans Indian Inst Met 72, 1001–1011 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-019-01563-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-019-01563-w

Keywords

Navigation