Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A 4-Year Multicentre Audit of Complications Following ORIF Treatment of Mandibular Fractures

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To ascertain the complications arising from open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular fractures and to elucidate if different osteosynthesis plating systems vary in treatment outcome.

Materials and Methods

This is a retrospective study. Parameters such as patient data, injury details, osteosynthesis implant system information, stability of fracture fragments, occlusion and complications were evaluated at different time intervals and logistic regression applied to determine the association of these factors with complications.

Results

Five hundred and ninety-three patients with mandibular fractures were included in this study (male 87.9% and female 12.1%), age range of 13–72 years (median = 22 years). Most fractures were caused by motor vehicle accidents (85.8%), assault (6.2%) and falls (4.7%). Parasymphyseal fractures were the most common (50.1%), followed by angle (35.2%) and body of mandible (25%). Median time interval between injury and intervention was 7 days (IQR 4–10). Median duration of follow-up from date of surgery was 72 days (IQR 30–230). 76.9% (456) were completely free of complications. Most complications (46%) occurred in the intermediate post-surgical period (1–6 weeks). Median interval period between surgery and complication was 15 days (IQR 7–67.5). Nerve injury and surgical site infection were the most common complications at 6.7% and 5.7%, respectively. There was a significant difference between the plating system in terms of complication outcome (p = 0.017).

Conclusion

Whilst the miniplate dimensions may be similar across different manufacturers, the complication outcome may differ between systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cawood JI (1985) Small plate osteosynthesis of mandibular fractures. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 23(2):77–91

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Prein J, Kellman RM (1987) Rigid internal fixation of mandibular fractures—basics of AO technique. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 20(3):441–456

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Raveh J, Vuillemin T, Lädrach K, Roux M, Sutter F (1987) Plate osteosynthesis of 367 mandibular fractures. The unrestricted indication for the intraoral approach. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 15(5):244–253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Spiessl B (1972) Rigid internal fixation of fractures of lower jaw. Reconstr Surg Traumtol 13:124–140

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Champy M, Lodde JP, Schmitt R, Jaeger JH, Muster D (1978) Mandibular osteosynthesis by miniature screwed plates via a buccal approach. J Maxillofac Surg 6:14–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Michelet FX, Deymes J, Dessus B (1973) Osteosynthesis with miniaturized screwed plates in maxillofacial surgery. J Maxillofac Surg 1(2):79–84

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Malata CM, McLean NR, Alvi R, McKiernan MV, Milner RH, Piggot TA (1997) An evaluation of the Wiirzburg titanium miniplate osteosynthesis system for mandibular fixation. Br J Plast Surg 50:26–32

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Alkan A, Celebi N, Ozden B, Bas B, Inal S (2007) Biomechanical comparison of different plating techniques in repair of mandibular angle fractures. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 104:752–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chiodo T, Ziccardi V, Janal M, Sabitini C (2006) Failure strength of 2.0 locking versus 2.0 conventional synthes mandibular plates: a laboratory model. Oral Maxillofac Surg 64:1475–1479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gear A, Apasova E, Schmitz J, Schubert W (2005) Treatment modalities for mandibular angle fractures. Oral Maxillofac Surg 63:655–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Seemann R, Perisanidis C, Schicho K, Wutzl A, Poeschl WP, Köhnke R, Kinast B, Brunner J, Krennmair G, Ewers R, Klug C (2010) Complication rates of operatively treated mandibular fractures e the mandibular neck. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 109(6):815–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zachariades N, Mezitis M, Mourouzis C, Papadakis D, Spanou A (2006) Fractures of the mandibular condyle: a review of 466 cases. Literature review, reflections on treatment and proposals. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 34(7):421–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Burm JS, Hansen JE (2010) The use of microplates for internal fixation of mandibular fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 5:1485–1492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen CT, Feng CH, Tsay PK, Lai JP, Chen YR (2011) Functional outcomes following surgical treatment of bilateral mandibular condylar fractures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 40(1):38–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ellis E III (1998) Complications of mandibular condyle fractures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 4:255–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Marker P, Nielsen A, Bastian HL (2000) Fractures of the mandibular condyle. Part 2: results of treatment of 348 patients. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 5:422–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Park JM, Jang YW, Kim SG, Park YW, Rotaru H, Baciut G et al (2010) Comparative study of the prognosis of an extracorporeal reduction and a closed treatment in mandibular condyle head and/or neck fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 12:2986–2993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ramli R, Oxley J, Noor FM, Abdullah NK, Mahmood MS, Tajuddin AK, McClure R (2014) Fatal injuries among motorcyclists in Klang Valley, Malaysia. J Forensic Leg Med 26:39–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Theologie-Lygidakis N, Iatrou L, Eliades G, Papanikolaou S (2007) A retrieval study on morphological and chemical changes of titanium osteosynthesis plates and adjacent tissues. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 35:168–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bhatt V, Chhabra P, Dover MS (2005) Removal of miniplates in maxillofacial surgery: a follow-up study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 63:756–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. O’Connell J, Murphy C, Ikeagwuani O, Adley C, Kearns G (2009) The fate of titanium miniplates and screws used in maxillofacial surgery: a 10 year retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 38:731–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mosbash MR, Oloyede D, Koppel DA, Moos KF, Steinhouse D (2003) Miniplate removal in trauma and orthognathic surgery- a retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 32:148–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rallis G, Mourouzis C, Papakosta V, Papanastasiou G, Zacharides N (2006) Reasons for miniplate removal following maxillofacial trauma: a 4-year study. J Cranio Maxillofac Surg. 34:435–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Langford RJ, Frame JW (2002) Surface analysis of titanium maxillofacial plates and screws retrieved from patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 31:511–518

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Matthew IR, Frame JW (1999) Policy of consultant oral and maxillofacial surgeons towards removal of miniplate components after jaw fracture fixation—a pilot study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 37:110–112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Brown JS, Trotter M, Cliffe J, Ward- Booth RP, Williams ED (1989) The fate of miniplates in facial trauma and orthognathic surgery: a retrospective study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 27:306–315

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Höfer SH, Ha L, Ballon A, Sader R, Landes C (2012) Treatment of mandibular angle fractures—linea obliqua plate versus grid plate. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 40(8):807–811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Fox AJ, Kellman RM (2003) Mandibular angle fractures: two-miniplate fixation and complications. Arch Facial Plast Surg 5(6):464–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Cervantes TM, Slocum AH Jr, Seldin EB (2012) Design and experimental evaluation of adjustable bone plates for mandibular fracture fixation. J Biomech 45(1):172–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors also wish to acknowledge and thank the Director General, Ministry of Health of Malaysia, for his support and consent to conduct and publish this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sathesh Balasundram.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This study was approved by the ethical committee of the Medical Research and Ethics Committee of Ministry of Health of Malaysia; approval ID: NMRR-12-1430-14308.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Balasundram, S., Kovilpillai, F.J., Royan, S.J. et al. A 4-Year Multicentre Audit of Complications Following ORIF Treatment of Mandibular Fractures. J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg. 19, 289–297 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-019-01204-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-019-01204-1

Keywords

Navigation