Skip to main content
Log in

Biomechanical testing of the reconstructed ulnar collateral ligament: a systematic review of the literature

  • Review
  • Published:
MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose was to perform a systematic review of the literature investigating biomechanical studies of ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction (UCLR) techniques to summarize the most commonly analyzed methods of fixation (at both the ulna and humerus), the degree of elbow flexion at the time of fixation, graft characteristics, and modes of failure with these techniques.

Materials and methods

A systematic review was performed. All cadaveric biomechanical studies that tested a reconstruction method for UCLR were included. Descriptive statistics were calculated for each study and parameter/variable analyzed.

Results

Twenty-three studies were included with a total of 397 elbows in 242 cadavers (mean age 54.8 ± 20 years, range 16–96). The majority of studies (65 %) used a palmaris longus graft. The docking technique (37.2 %) was the most commonly tested reconstruction method. Significant heterogeneity between studies precluded assimilation of specific techniques (each of the 23 studies utilized a unique technique). Fixation was performed at 30°–90° of elbow flexion. The most common mode of failure was suture failure (51 %), followed by midsubstance rupture (27.00 %), and bone tunnel fracture (14.00 %). No significant differences were observed amongst techniques for all measures analyzed.

Conclusion

This study found the docking technique to be the most commonly tested technique, while the mode of reconstruction failure was most commonly at the suture interface. If the graft failed at the bone interface, it was most likely to occur at the ulna. Surgeon preference and comfort level with a specific technique should dictate choice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cain EL Jr, Andrews JR, Dugas JR, Wilk KE, McMichael CS, Walter JC 2nd et al (2010) Outcome of ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction of the elbow in 1281 athletes: results in 743 athletes with minimum 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 38:2426–2434. doi:10.1177/0363546510378100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dines JS, ElAttrache NS, Conway JE, Smith W, Ahmad CS (2007) Clinical outcomes of the DANE TJ technique to treat ulnar collateral ligament insufficiency of the elbow. Am J Sports Med 35:2039–2044. doi:10.1177/0363546507305802

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Erickson BJ, Bach BR Jr, Cohen MS, Bush-Joseph CA, Cole BJ, Verma NN et al (2016) Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction: the rush experience. Orthop J Sports Med 4:2325967115626876. doi:10.1177/2325967115626876

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Erickson BJ, Gupta AK, Harris JD, Bush-Joseph C, Bach BR, Abrams GD et al (2013) Rate of return to pitching and performance after tommy john surgery in major league baseball pitchers. Am J Sports Med. doi:10.1177/0363546513510890

    Google Scholar 

  5. Erickson BJ, Nwachukwu BU, Rosas S, Schairer WW, McCormick FM, Bach BR Jr et al (2015) Trends in medial ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction in the united states: a retrospective review of a large private-payer database from 2007 to 2011. Am J Sports Med 43:1770–1774. doi:10.1177/0363546515580304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. O’Brien DF, O’Hagan T, Stewart R, Atanda AW Jr, Hammoud S, Cohen SB et al (2015) Outcomes for ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction: a retrospective review using the KJOC assessment score with two-year follow-up in an overhead throwing population. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2015.01.020

    Google Scholar 

  7. Erickson BJ, Harris JD, Chalmers PN, Bach BR Jr, Verma NN, Bush-Joseph CA et al (2015) Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction: anatomy, indications, techniques, and outcomes. Sports Health 7:511–517. doi:10.1177/1941738115607208

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Fleisig GS, Andrews JR, Dillman CJ, Escamilla RF (1995) Kinetics of baseball pitching with implications about injury mechanisms. Am J Sports Med 23:233–239

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fleisig GS, Barrentine SW, Zheng N, Escamilla RF, Andrews JR (1999) Kinematic and kinetic comparison of baseball pitching among various levels of development. J Biomech 32:1371–1375

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Morrey BF (1986) Applied anatomy and biomechanics of the elbow joint. Instr Course Lect 35:59–68

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Morrey BF, An KN (1983) Articular and ligamentous contributions to the stability of the elbow joint. Am J Sports Med 11:315–319

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cohen MS, Bruno RJ (2001) The collateral ligaments of the elbow: anatomy and clinical correlation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 383:123–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jobe FW, Stark H, Lombardo SJ (1986) Reconstruction of the ulnar collateral ligament in athletes. J Bone Joint Surg Am 68:1158–1163

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Azar FM, Andrews JR, Wilk KE, Groh D (2000) Operative treatment of ulnar collateral ligament injuries of the elbow in athletes. Am J Sports Med 28:16–23

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Erickson BJ, Chalmers PN, Bush-Joseph CA, Verma NN, Romeo AA (2015) Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction of the elbow: a systematic review of the literature. Orthop J Sports Med 3:2325967115618914. doi:10.1177/2325967115618914

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. McGraw MA, Kremchek TE, Hooks TR, Papangelou C (2013) Biomechanical evaluation of the docking plus ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction technique compared with the docking technique. Am J Sports Med 41:313–320. doi:10.1177/0363546512466375

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Paletta GA Jr, Klepps SJ, Difelice GS, Allen T, Brodt MD, Burns ME et al (2006) Biomechanical evaluation of 2 techniques for ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction of the elbow. Am J Sports Med 34:1599–1603. doi:10.1177/0363546506289340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Vitale MA, Ahmad CS (2008) The outcome of elbow ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction in overhead athletes: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med 36:1193–1205. doi:10.1177/0363546508319053

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Conway JE, Jobe FW, Glousman RE, Pink M (1992) Medial instability of the elbow in throwing athletes. Treatment by repair or reconstruction of the ulnar collateral ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am 74:67–83

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Andrews JR, Timmerman LA (1995) Outcome of elbow surgery in professional baseball players. Am J Sports Med 23:407–413

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Morgan RJ, Starman JS, Habet NA, Peindl RD, Bankston LS Jr, D’Alessandro DD et al (2010) A biomechanical evaluation of ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction using a novel technique for ulnar-sided fixation. Am J Sports Med 38:1448–1455. doi:10.1177/0363546510363463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rohrbough JT, Altchek DW, Hyman J, Williams RJ 3rd, Botts JD (2002) Medial collateral ligament reconstruction of the elbow using the docking technique. Am J Sports Med 30:541–548

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Thompson WH, Jobe FW, Yocum LA, Pink MM (2001) Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction in athletes: muscle-splitting approach without transposition of the ulnar nerve. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 10:152–157. doi:10.1067/mse.2001.112881

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup DF (1999) Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses. Lancet 354:1896–1900

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Dodson CC, Thomas A, Dines JS, Nho SJ, Williams RJ 3rd, Altchek DW (2006) Medial ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction of the elbow in throwing athletes. Am J Sports Med 34:1926–1932. doi:10.1177/0363546506290988

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hechtman KS, Zvijac JE, Wells ME, Botto-van Bemden A (2011) Long-term results of ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction in throwing athletes based on a hybrid technique. Am J Sports Med 39:342–347. doi:10.1177/0363546510385401

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Dodson CC, Slenker N, Cohen SB, Ciccotti MG, DeLuca P (2010) Ulnar collateral ligament injuries of the elbow in professional football quarterbacks. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 19:1276–1280. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2010.05.028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Koh JL, Schafer MF, Keuter G, Hsu JE (2006) Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction in elite throwing athletes. Arthroscopy 22:1187–1191. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2006.07.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Conte SA, Fleisig GS, Dines JS, Wilk KE, Aune KT, Patterson-Flynn N et al (2015) Prevalence of ulnar collateral ligament surgery in professional baseball players. Am J Sports Med 43:1764–1769. doi:10.1177/0363546515580792

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Dines JS, Yocum LA, Frank JB, ElAttrache NS, Gambardella RA, Jobe FW (2008) Revision surgery for failed elbow medial collateral ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 36:1061–1065. doi:10.1177/0363546508314796

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Marshall NE, Keller RA, Lynch JR, Bey MJ, Moutzouros V (2015) pitching performance and longevity after revision ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction in major league baseball pitchers. Am J Sports Med. doi:10.1177/0363546515579636

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wilson AT, Pidgeon TS, Morrell NT, DaSilva MF (2015) Trends in revision elbow ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction in professional baseball pitchers. J Hand Surg. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.07.024

    Google Scholar 

  33. Watson JN, McQueen P, Hutchinson MR (2013) A systematic review of ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction techniques. Am J Sports Med. doi:10.1177/0363546513509051

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

There was no funding for this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. M. Saltzman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest or disclosures of or pertaining to the completion of this manuscript. Beyond the scope of this manuscript, the following disclosures are noted for the authors: Bryan M. Saltzman receives publishing royalties, financial or material support from Nova Science Publishers and Postgraduate institute for Medicine. Brandon Erickson declares that he has no conflict of interest. Jonathan Frank declares that he has no conflict of interest. Joshua Harris is a board or committee member of AAOS and AOSSM and AANA, is on the editorial board of Arthroscopy and Frontiers in Surgery, receives research support from DePuy A Johnson & Johnson Company, is a paid consultant for NIA Magellan, receives publishing royalties/financial/material support from SLACK Incorporated, and a paid presented or speaker with research support for Smith & Nephew. Gregory Nicholson receives IP royalties from Innomed, receives Publishing royalties, financial or material support from SLACK Incorporated, is a paid consultant with research support from Tornier, and receives stock options from Zimmer. Bernard Bach is on the board of AOSSM, receives research support from Arthrex, Inc, CONMED Linvatec, DJ Orthopaedics, Ossur, Smith & Nephew, and Tornier, and receives publishing royalties from SLACK Incorporated. Nikhil Verma is on the board of AOSSM and ASES and AANA and Arthroscopy and Journal of Knee Surgery, receives publishing royalties from Arthroscopy, receives research support from Arthrex Inc and Arthrosurface and DJ Orthopaedics, receives stock options from Cymedica, is a paid consultant with stock options for Minivasive, is a paid consultant for Orthospace, receives stock options for Omeros, receives research support from Ossur, is on the governing board of SLACK Incorporated, receives IP royalties, is a paid consultant for Smith & Nephew, receives research support from Smith & Nephew, Athletico, ConMed Linvatec, Miomed, Mitek, and receives publishing royalties from Vindico Medical-Orthopedics Hyperguide. Anthony Romeo is on the board of AOSSM and ASES, receives royalties, is a paid consultant and presenter for Arthrex, Inc., receives research support from DJO Surgical, is on the editorial or governing board of Orthopedics and Orthopedics Today, receives research support from Ossur, is on the editorial board of SAGE, receives publishing royalties from Saunders/Mosby-Elseview, is on the editorial or governing board with publishing royalties from SLACK Incorporated, receives research support from Smith & Nephew, and is on editorial board of Wolters Kluwer Health–Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

No humans were involved.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saltzman, B.M., Erickson, B.J., Frank, J.M. et al. Biomechanical testing of the reconstructed ulnar collateral ligament: a systematic review of the literature. Musculoskelet Surg 100, 157–163 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-016-0426-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-016-0426-z

Keywords

Navigation