Skip to main content
Log in

Safety and Outcome of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Following Removal of Adjustable Gastric Banding: Lessons from 109 Patients in a Single Center and Review of the Literature

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Although considered a common bariatric procedure, laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) is associated with high rates of weight loss failure and long-term complications.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to re-assess the safety and outcome of conversion of failed LAGB to laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).

Materials and Methods

One hundred and nine patients underwent conversion from LAGB to LSG (78 females, mean age 43 ± 11.3 years, mean BMI 42.4 ± 7.4 kg/m2). Patient demographics, obesity-related co-morbidities, BMI before and after the procedure, post-operative complications, and length of hospital stay were documented.

Results

All cases were completed laproscopically, with 88% (n = 96) performed in a single stage. Fourteen patients developed early post-operative complications (12.8%), including two leaks and three post-operative bleeding. There were no mortalities in this series. Average BMI at least 1-year following surgery was 33 ± 5.3 kg/m2 (excess weight loss (EWL) = 53.7%).

Conclusions

Our data suggests that conversion of failed LAGB to LSG is both safe and effective. Randomized controlled studies comparing conversion of a failed LAGB to sleeve gastrectomy versus other bariatric operations are necessary to clarify the optimal conversion procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Christou NV, Sampalis JS, Liberman M, et al. Surgery decreases long-term mortality, morbidity, and health care use in morbidly obese patients. Ann Surg. 2004;240:416–23. discussion 423-414

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Adams TD, Gress RE, Smith SC, et al. Long-term mortality after gastric bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:753–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;292:1724–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cunneen SA. Review of meta-analytic comparisons of bariatric surgery with a focus on laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008;4:S47–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Favretti F, Segato G, Ashton D, et al. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in 1,791 consecutive obese patients: 12-year results. Obes Surg. 2007;17:168–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Biertho L, Steffen R, Branson R, et al. Management of failed adjustable gastric banding. Surgery. 2005;137:33–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Suter M, Calmes JM, Paroz A, et al. A 10-year experience with laparoscopic gastric banding for morbid obesity: high long-term complication and failure rates. Obes Surg. 2006;16:829–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. DeMaria EJ, Sugerman HJ, Meador JG, et al. High failure rate after laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding for treatment of morbid obesity. Ann Surg. 2001;233:809–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Elnahas A, Graybiel K, Farrokhyar F, et al. Revisional surgery after failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:740–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Weber M, Muller MK, Michel JM, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, but not rebanding, should be proposed as rescue procedure for patients with failed laparoscopic gastric banding. Ann Surg. 2003;238:827–33. discussion 833-824

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Jones Jr KB. Revisional bariatric surgery—potentially safe and effective. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2005;1:599–603.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hallowell PT, Stellato TA, Yao DA, et al. Should bariatric revisional surgery be avoided secondary to increased morbidity and mortality? Am J Surg. 2009;197:391–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Spivak H, Beltran OR, Slavchev P, et al. Laparoscopic revision from LAP-BAND to gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:1388–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. van Wageningen B, Berends FJ, Van Ramshorst B, et al. Revision of failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2006;16:137–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Topart P, Becouarn G, Ritz P. Biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch or gastric bypass for failed gastric banding: retrospective study from two institutions with preliminary results. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007;3:521–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Iannelli A, Schneck AS, Ragot E, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as revisional procedure for failed gastric banding and vertical banded gastroplasty. Obes Surg. 2009;19:1216–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gill RS, Switzer N, Driedger M, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with staple line buttress reinforcement in 116 consecutive morbidly obese patients. Obes Surg. 2012;22:560–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Frezza EE. Laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity. The future procedure of choice? Surg Today. 2007;37:275–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sippey M, Kasten KR, Chapman WH. 30-day readmissions after sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016; doi:10.1016/j.soard.2016.01.036.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Osland E, Yunus RM, Khan S, et al. Postoperative early major and minor complications in laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy (LVSG) versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) procedures: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Obes Surg. 2016; doi:10.1007/s11695-016-2101-8.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Noel P, Schneck AS, Nedelcu M, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a revisional procedure for failed gastric banding: lessons from 300 consecutive cases. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10:1116–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Marin-Perez P, Betancourt A, Lamota M, et al. Outcomes after laparoscopic conversion of failed adjustable gastric banding to sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Br J Surg. 2014;101:254–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Moon RC, Teixeira AF, Jawad MA. Conversion of failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass? Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9:901–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. O’Brien PE. Bariatric surgery: mechanisms, indications and outcomes. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;25:1358–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Guetta O, Ovnat A, Shaked G, et al. Analysis of morbidity data of 308 cases of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy—the Soroka experience. Obes Surg. 2015; doi:10.1007/s11695-015-1665-z.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Khoursheed M, Al-Bader I, Mouzannar A, et al. Sleeve gastrectomy or gastric bypass as revisional bariatric procedures: retrospective evaluation of outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:4277–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Goitein D, Feigin A, Segal-Lieberman G, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a revisional option after gastric band failure. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:2626–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gagner M, Deitel M, Erickson AL, et al. Survey on laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) at the fourth international consensus summit on sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2013;23:2013–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Yazbek T, Safa N, Denis R, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG)—a good bariatric option for failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB): a review of 90 patients. Obes Surg. 2013;23:300–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shai Meron Eldar.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pencovich, N., Lahat, G., Goldray, O. et al. Safety and Outcome of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Following Removal of Adjustable Gastric Banding: Lessons from 109 Patients in a Single Center and Review of the Literature. OBES SURG 27, 1266–1270 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2463-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2463-y

Keywords

Navigation