Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Soil porosity in physically separated fractions and its role in SOC protection

  • Soils, Sec 1 • Soil Organic Matter Dynamics and Nutrient Cycling • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Soils and Sediments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Processes that lead to soil organic carbon (SOC) protection depend on both soil porosity and structure organization, as well as chemical and biological properties. In particular, the soil micro-nano porosity (<30 μm) regulates microorganism accessibility to the soil pore system and offers surfaces for organic carbon adsorption and intercalation into soil minerals. The aim of this work was to investigate how pore size distribution can selectively protect specific carbon pools in different aggregate size fractions, by considering the effects of long-term application of farmyard manure (FYM) and mineral (Min) fertilization.

Materials and methods

Macroaggregates (250–2000 μm), microaggregates (53–250 μm), and silt–clay (<53 μm) fractions of three different soils (clayey, peaty, and sandy) were separated by wet sieving technique and then subjected to chemical and physical analysis. Sample porosity and pore size distribution were analyzed using mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP), while SOC chemical structure was characterized by means of nuclear magnetic resonance (13C cross-polarization–magic angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance (CP MAS 13C NMR)) and diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform (DRIFT) spectroscopies.

Results and discussion

Results showed that FYM increased organic (OC) and humic carbon (HC) content compared to the Min fertilization and unfertilized soils. However, it caused a gradual decrease in O,N-alkyl C, and alkyl C of humic C from macroaggregate to silt–clay fractions, suggesting an advanced state of humic component degradation as revealed by CP MAS 13C NMR, DRIFT analyses. MIP analysis showed a clear increase of micropores (5–30 μm) and cryptopores (0.0035–0.1 μm) from macroaggregate to silt–clay fractions, while minor differences were observed among the treatments. The application of principal component analysis to mineral soil fractions identified the formation of three main clusters, where (i) macroaggregates of clayey soil were mainly associated to cryptopores and OC and (ii) microaggregates and silt–clay fraction were mainly isolated by carbonyl C, ultramicropores, and total porosity. The third cluster was associated with medium and fine sand of the sand soil fraction as coupled with O,N-alkyl C, anomeric C, mesopores, and HC/OC ratio.

Conclusions

Overall, this study indicates that pore size distribution may be a valuable indicator of soil capacity to sequester carbon, due to its direct influence on SOC linkages with soil aggregates and the positive effects against SOC decomposition phenomena. In this context, micropore- to nanopore-dominated structures (e.g., clayey soil) were able to protect OC compounds by interacting with mineral surfaces and intercalation with phyllosilicates, while meso/macropore-dominated structures (i.e., sandy soil) exhibited their low ability to protect the organic components.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cameron KC, Buchan GD (2006) Porosity and pore size distribution. In: Lal R (ed) Encyclopedia of soil science. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen JS, Chiu CY (2003) Characterization of soil organic matter in different particle-size fractions in humid subalpine soils by CP/MAS 13C NMR. Geoderma 117:129–141

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chenu C, Hassink J, Bloem J (2001) Short-term changes in the spatial distribution of microorganisms in soil aggregates as affected by glucose addition. Biol Fertil Soils 34:349–356

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chenu C, Stotzky G (2002) Interactions between microorganisms and soil particles. An overview. In: Huang PM, Bollag JM, Senesi N (eds) Interactions between soil particles and microorganisms. Wiley-VCH-Verlag, Weinheim, pp. 3–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen BT (2001) Physical fractionation of soil and structural and functional complexity in organic matter turnover. Eur J Soil Sci 52:345–353

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Czarnes S, Hallett PD, Bengough AG, Young IM (2000) Root- and microbial-derived mucilages affect soil structure and water transport. Eur J Soil Sci 51:435–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dal Ferro N, Charrier P, Morari F (2013) Dual-scale micro-CT assessment of soil structure in a long-term fertilization experiment. Geoderma 204–205:84–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dal Ferro N, Delmas P, Duwig C, Simonetti G, Morari F (2012) Coupling X-ray microtomography and mercury intrusion porosimetry to quantify aggregate structures of a cambisol under different fertilisation treatments. Soil Tillage Res 119:13–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derenne S, Largeau C (2001) A review of some important families of refractory macromolecules: composition, origin, and fate in soils and sediments. Soil Sci 166:833–847

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dungait JAJ, Hopkins DW, Gregory AS, Whitmore AP (2012) Soil organic matter turnover is governed by accessibility not recalcitrance. Glob Chang Biol 18:1781–1796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards AM, Phillips RA, Watkins NW, Freeman MP, Murphy EJ, et al. (2007) Revisiting Levy flight search patterns of wandering albatrosses, bumblebees and deer. Nature 449:1044–1048

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott ET, Coleman DC (1988) Let the soil work for us. Ecol Bull 39:23–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Eusterhues K, Rumpel C, Kogel-Knabner I (2007) Composition and radio C age of HF resistant soil organic matter in a Podzol and a Cambisol. Org Geochem 38:1356–1372

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Francioso O, Ferrari E, Saladini M, Montecchio D, Gioacchini P, Ciavatta C (2007) TG-DTA, DRIFT and NMR characterization of humic-like fractions from olive wastes and amended soil. J Hazard Mater 149:408–417

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Francioso O, Montecchio D, Gioacchini P, Cavani L, Ciavatta C, Trubetskoj O, Trubetskaya O (2009) Structural differences of Chernozem soil humic acids SEC–PAGE fractions revealed by thermal (TG–DTA) and spectroscopic (DRIFT) analyses. Geoderma 152:264–268

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman C, Ostle NJ, Fenner N, Kang H (2004) A regulatory role for phenol oxidase during decomposition in peatlands. Soil Biol Biochem 36:1663–1667

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grosbellet C, Vidal-Beaudet L, Caubel V, Charpentier S (2011) Improvement of soil structure formation by degradation of coarse organic matter. Geoderma 162:27–38

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hajnos M, Lipiec J, Świeboda R, Sokolowska Z, Witkowska-Walczak B (2006) Complete characterization of pore size distribution of tilled and orchard loamy soil using water retention curve, mercury porosimetry, nitrogen adsorption, and water desorption methods. Geoderma 135:307–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes RJ, Naidu R (1998) Influence of lime, fertilizer and manure applications on soil organic matter content and soil physical conditions: a review. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 51:123–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helfrich M, Ludwig B, Buurman P, Flessa H (2006) Effect of land use on the composition of soil organic matter in density and aggregate fractions as revealed by solid-state 13C NMR spectroscopy. Geoderma 136:331–341

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Henaut Y, Alauzet C, KLambin M (2002) Effect of starvation on the search path characteristics of Orius majusculus. J Appl Entomol 126:501–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu WG, Mao J, Xing B, Schmidt-Rohr K (2000) Poly(methylene) crystallites in humic substances detected by nuclear magnetic resonance. Environ Sci Technol 34:530–534

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hussein J, Adey MA (1998) Changes in microstructure, voids and b-fabric of surface samples of a Vertisol caused by wet/dry cycles. Geoderma 85:63–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jastrow JD, Miller RM (1998) Soil aggregate stabilization and carbon sequestration: feedbacks through organomineral associations. In: Lal R, Kimble JM, Follett RF, Stewart BA (eds) Soil processes and the carbon cycle. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 207–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser K, Guggenberger G (2003) Mineral surfaces and soil organic matter. Eur J Soil Sci 54:219–236

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kelleher BP, Simpson MJ, Simpson AJ (2006) Assessing the fate and transformations of plant residues in the terrestrial environment using HR-MAS NMR spectroscopy. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 70:4080–4094

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khanna M, Yoder M, Calamai L, Stotzky G (1998) X-ray diffractometry and electron microscopy of DNA bond to clay minerals. Sci Soils 3:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuka K, Franko U, Rühlmann J (2007) Modelling the impact of pore space distribution on C turnover. Ecol Model 208:295–306

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lugato E, Simonetti G, Morari F, Nardi S, Berti A, Giardini L (2010) Distribution of organic and humic carbon in wet-sieved aggregates of different soils under long-term fertilization experiment. Geoderma 157:80–85

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lützow MV, Kögel-Knabner I, Ekschmitt K, Flessa H, Guggenberger G, Matzner E, Marschner B (2007) OM fractionation methods: relevance to functional pools and to stabilization mechanisms. Soil Biol Biochem 39:2183–2207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lützow MV, Kögel-Knabner I, Ekschmitt K, Matzner E, Guggenberger G, Marshner B, Flessa H (2006) Stabilization of organic matter in temperate soils: mechanisms and their relevance under different soil conditions—a review. Eur J Soil Sci 57:426–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mafra AL, Senesi N, Brunetti G, Miklós AAW, Melfi AJ (2007) Humic acids from hydromorphic soils of the upper Negro river basin, Amazonas: chemical and spectroscopic characterisation. Geoderma 138:170–176

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mao JD, Fang XW, Schmidt-Rohr K, Carmo AM, Hundal LS, Thompson ML (2007) Molecular-scale heterogeneity of humic acid in particle-size fractions of two Iowa soils. Geoderma 140:17–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marschner B, Brodowski S, Dreves A, et al. (2008) How relevant is recalcitrance for the stabilization of organic matter in soils? J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 171:1–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morari F, Lugato E, Giardini L (2008) Olsen phosphorus, exchangeable cations and salinity in two long-term experiments of north-eastern Italy and assessment of soil quality evolution. Agric Ecosyst Environ 124:85–96

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oades JM, Waters AG (1991) Aggregate hierarchy in soils. Aust J Soil Res 29:815–828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oorts K, Bossuyt H, Labreuche J, Merckx R, Nicolardot B (2007) Carbon and nitrogen stocks in relation to organic matter fractions, aggregation and pore size distribution in no-tillage and conventional tillage in northern France. Eur J Soil Sci 58:248–259

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pagliai M, Vignozzi N, Pellegrini S (2004) Soil structure and the effect of management practices. Soil Tillage Res 79:131–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piccolo A (2002) The supramolecular structure of humic substances. A novel understanding of humus chemistry and implications in soil science. Soil Sci 166:810–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pituello C, Dal Ferro N, Simonetti G, Berti A, Morari F (2016) Nano to macro pore structure changes induced by long-term residue management in three different soils. Agric Ecosyst Environ 217:49–58

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rao CNR (1963) Chemical applications of infrared spectroscopy. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Regelink IC, Cathelijne R, Stoof CR, Rousseva S, Weng L, Lair GJ, Kram P, Nikolaos P, Nikolaidis NP, Kercheva M, Banwart S, Comans RNJ (2015) Linkages between aggregate formation, porosity and soil chemical properties. Geoderma 247–248:24–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds PJ, Sharma P, Jenneman GE, McInerney MJ (1989) Mechanisms of microbial movement in subsurface materials. Appl Environ Microbiol 55:2280–2286

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schjønning P, Elmholt S, Munkholm LJ, Debosz K (2002) Soil quality aspects of humid sandy loams as influenced by organic and conventional long-term management. Agric Ecosyst Environ 88:195–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt MW, Torn MS, Abiven S, Dittmar T, Guggenberger G, Janssens IA, Kleber M, Kögel-Knabner I, Lehmann J, Manning DA, Nannipieri P, Rasse DP, Weiner S, Trumbore SE (2011) Persistence of soil organic matter as an ecosystem property. Nature 478(7367):49–56

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simonetti G, Francioso O, Nardi S, Berti A, Brugnoli E, Lugato E, Morari F (2012) Characterization of humic carbon in aggregate soil fractions in a long-term experiment with manure and mineral fertilization. Soil Sci Soc Am J 76:880–890

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Six J, Bossuyt H, Degryze S, Denef K (2004) A history of research on the link between (micro) aggregates, soil biota, and soil organic matter dynamics. Soil Tillage Res 79:7–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Six J, Conant RT, Paul EA, Paustian K (2002) Stabilization mechanisms of soil organic matter: implications for C-saturation of soils. Plant Soil 241:155–176

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Six J, Paustian K, Elliott ET, Combrink C (2000) Soil structure and organic matter: I. Distribution of aggregate-size classes and aggregate-associated carbon. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64:681–689

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • StatSoft Inc (2004) STATISTICA, version 7, www.statsoft.com

  • Strong DT, De Wever H, Merckx R, Recous S (2004) Spatial location of carbon decomposition in the soil pore system. Eur J Soil Sci 4:739–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theng BKG (2007) Formation and Properties of Clay-Polymer Complexes. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1979). doi:10.1002/jpln.19801430317

  • Van Haastert PJM, Bosgraaf L (2009) Food searching strategy of amoeboid cells by starvation induced run length extension. PLoS One 4(8):6814. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0006814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermeer AWP, Koopal LK (1998) Adsorption of humic acids to mineral particles. 2. Polydispersity effects with polyelectrolyte adsorption. Langmuir 14:4210–4216

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vermeer AWP, van Riemsdijk WH, Koopal LK (1998) Adsorption of humic acid to mineral particles. 1. Specific and electrostatic interactions. Langmuir 14:2810–2819

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walkley A, Black IA (1934) An examination of Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci 37:29–37

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zaffar M, Lu SG (2015) Pore size distribution of clayey soils and its correlation with soil organic matter. Pedosphere 25:240–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gianluca Simonetti.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Heike Knicker

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Simonetti, G., Francioso, O., Dal Ferro, N. et al. Soil porosity in physically separated fractions and its role in SOC protection. J Soils Sediments 17, 70–84 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-016-1508-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-016-1508-0

Keywords

Navigation