Skip to main content
Log in

Investigating temporal and spatial patterns of cranberry yield in New Jersey fields

  • Published:
Precision Agriculture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cranberries are grown in sensitive wetland ecosystems and precision farming could be beneficial to reduce agro-chemical pollution and increase production without expanding area. Precision farming requires knowledge of the variation of yield within-fields but cranberry harvesting methods produce only one yield value per field unless an expensive pre-harvest berry count is done. Co-operatives and extension services have an important role in precision farming to: (1) determine important factors affecting yield patterns within a growing region and (2) identify fields that would benefit most from future intensive survey. This paper reports a study to investigate temporal and spatial patterns in useable and poor quality cranberry yield for the New Jersey (NJ), USA growing region. Principal components analysis indicated that mean growing season temperature is important for understanding temporal patterns in useable yield and maximum temperatures and precipitation for poor quality yield. Multiple linear regression showed that some cultivars were susceptible to disease and poor quality yield in years with high maximum growing season temperatures. Analysis of spatial patterns using area to area and area to point kriging, local cluster analysis and geographically weighted regression helped identify clusters of fields that were consistently yielding or alternated between high and low yielding. They also showed differences between owners and soil types particularly in hot or wet years showing the different response to soil types to weather and the potential for improvement in irrigation practices by some owners. The methods used should be useful for other growing regions and crops, particularly where there are no yield monitors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anselin, L. (1995). Local indicators of spatial association—LISA. Geographical Analysis, 27, 93–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baluja, J., Diago, M. P., Goovaerts, P., & Tardaguila, J. (2012). Spatio-temporal dynamics of grape anthocyanin accumulation in a Tempranillo vineyard monitored by proximal sensing. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 18, 173–182.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bramley, R. G. V., & Lamb, D. W. (2003). Making sense of vineyard variability in Australia. In R. Ortega & C. Esser (Eds.), Proceedings of the international symposium on precision viticulture, 9th Latin American Congress on viticulture and oenology (pp. 35–54). Chile: Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeMoranville, C. J., Davenport, J. R., Patten, K., Roper, T. R., Strik, B. C., Vorsa, N., et al. (1996). Fruit mass development in three cranberry cultivars and five production regions. Journal of the American Society of Horticultural Science, 121, 680–685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fotheringham, A. S., Brunsdon, C., & Charlton, M. (2002). Geographically weighted regression: the analysis of spatially varying relationships. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goovaerts, P. (2008). Kriging and semivariogram deconvolution in the presence of irregular geographical units. Mathematical Geosciences, 40, 101–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huete, A., Didan, K., Miura, T., Rodriguez, E. P., Gao, X., & Ferreira, L. G. (2002). Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices. Remote Sensing of the Environment, 83, 195–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacquez, G. M., Goovaerts, P., Kaufmann, A., & Rommel, R. (2014). SpaceStat 4.0 user manual: software for the space-time analysis of dynamic complex systems (4th ed.). Ann Arbor: BioMedware.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerry, R., Giménez, D., Oudemans, P., & Goovaerts, P. (2010). Investigating the potential of Area-to-Point kriging for defining management zones for precision farming of cranberries. In P. M. Atkinson & C. D. Lloyd (Eds.), GeoENV 2008—Geostatistics for environmental applications (pp. 265–278). London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerry, R., Goovaerts, P., Gimenez, D., & Oudemans, P. (2016). Investigating geostatistical methods to model within-field yield variability of cranberries for potential management zones. Precision Agriculture, 17, 243–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyriakidis, P. (2004). A geostatistical framework for area-to-point spatial interpolation. Geographical Analysis, 36, 259–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lark, R. M., & Stafford, J. V. (1996). Classification as a first step in the interpretation of temporal and spatial variability of crop yield. In Aspects of applied biology, Volume 46: Modelling in applied biology: Spatial aspects (pp. 139–142). Association of Applied Biologists.

  • Novy, R. G., Vorsa, N., & Patten, K. (1996). Identifying genotypic heterogeneity in McFarlin’ cranberry: A randomly-amplifies polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and phenotypic analysis. Journal of the American Society of Horticultural Science, 121, 210–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, MA., Carroll, ZL. (2004). Description of spatial variation in soil to optimize cereal management. Project report No. 330, London: Home Grown Cereals Authority.

  • Oudemans, P. V. (1999). Detection, quantification and identification of Phytophthora species associated with cranberry bogs. Plant Disease, 83, 251–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oudemans, P. V., Polashock, J. L., & Vinyard, B. T. (2008). Fairy ring disease of cranberry: Assessment of crop losses and impact on cultivar genotype. Plant Disease, 92, 616–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oudemans, P. V., Pozdnyakova, L., Hughes, M. G., & Rahman, F. (2002). GIS and remote sensing for detecting yield loss in cranberry culture. Journal of Nematology, 34, 207–212.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pozdnyakova, L., Giménez, D., & Oudemans, P. V. (2005). Spatial analysis of cranberry yield at three scales. Agronomy Journal, 97, 29–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pozdnyakova, L., Oudemans, P. V., Hughes, M. G., & Giménez, D. (2002). Estimation of spatial and spectral properties of phytophthora root rot and its effects on cranberry yield. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 37, 57–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roper, T. R. (2001). ‘Stevens’ Cranberry. Journal of the American Pomological Society, 55, 66–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roper, T. R., & Klueh, J. S. (1994). Removing new growth reduces fruiting in cranberry. HortScience, 29, 199–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roper, T. R., Klueh, J., & Hagidimitriou, M. (1995). Shading timing and intensity influences fruit set and yield in cranberry. HortScience, 30, 525–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roper, T. R., Stang, E. J., & Hawker, G. M. (1992). Early season leaf removal reduces fruit set and size in cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait.). HortScience, 27, 75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soil Survey Staff, (1971). Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. New Jersey; Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) Database for Burlington County. Available online at http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/

  • Strik, B. C., Roper, T. R., DeMoranville, C. J., Davenport, J. R., & Poole, A. P. (1991). Cultivar and growing region influence return bloom in cranberry uprights. HortScience, 26, 1366–1367.

    Google Scholar 

  • VSN International (2011). GenStat for Windows 14th Eds. VSN International, Hemel Hempstead, UK. Web page: GenStat.co.uk

Download references

Acknowledgments

Ocean Spray Cranberries Inc. provided yield data. Funding was provided as part of USDA-IFAFS grant# 2001-52103-11310. Larisa Pozdnyakova (Golovko) of RiceTec, Alvin, TX, collected and pre-processed data. Dan A. Sims, Ball State University, calculated EVI values. Dr. Goovaerts’ work was funded by Grant R21 ES021570-01A1 from the National Cancer Institute.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Kerry.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kerry, R., Goovaerts, P., Giménez, D. et al. Investigating temporal and spatial patterns of cranberry yield in New Jersey fields. Precision Agric 18, 507–524 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-016-9471-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-016-9471-8

Keywords

Navigation