This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Barbier EB, Hacker SD, Kennedy C, Koch EW, Stier AC, Silliman BR (2011) The value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services. Ecol Monogr 81(2):169–183. https://doi.org/10.1890/10-1510.1
Brasil (2011) Ministério da Pesca e Aquicultura. Boletim estatístico da pesca e aquicultura 2011. MPA, Brasília. http://www.icmbio.gov.br/cepsul/images/stories/biblioteca/download/estatistica/est_2011_bol__bra.pdf. Accessed 30 Nov 2018
Bloomfield AL, Gillanders BM (2005) Fish and invertebrate assemblages in seagrass, mangrove, saltmarsh, and nonvegetated habitats. Estuaries 28:63–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02732754
Casatti L (2010) Alterações no Código Florestal Brasileiro: impactos potenciais sobre a ictiofauna. Biota Neotrop 10(4):31–34. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1676-06032010000400002
Fearnside PM (2016) Brazilian politics threaten environmental policies. Science 353:746–748. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aag0254
Grasel D, Mormul RP, Bozelli RL, Thomaz SM, Jarenkow JA (2018) Brazil’s native vegetation protection law threatens to collapse pond functions. Perspect Ecol Conserv 16(4):234–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2018.08.003
IBGE (2017) Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Pesquisa Pecuária Municipal. https://sidra.ibge.gov.br/pesquisa/ppm/quadros/brasil/2017. Accessed 03 Dec 2018.
IBGE (2018) Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Diretoria de Pesquisas (DPE) Coordenação de População e Indicadores Sociais (COPIS). ftp://ftp.ibge.gov.br/Estimativas_de_Populacao/Estimativas_2018/estimativa_dou_2018_20181019.pdf. Accessed 03 Dec 2018.
Metzger JP, Lewinsohn TM, Joly CA, Verdade LM, Martinelli LA, Rodrigues RR (2010) Brazilian law: full speed in reverse? Science 329:276–277. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.329.5989.276-b
Padial AA, Agostinho ÂA, Azevedo Santos VM, Frehse FA, Lima-Junior DP, Magalhães ALB, Mormul RP, Pelicice FM, Bezerra LAV, Orsi ML, Petrere-Junior M, Vitule JRS (2017) The “Tilapia Law” encouraging non-native fish threatens Amazonian River basins. Biodivers Conserv 26(1):243–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1229-0
Rochman CM (2016) Ecologically relevant data are policy-relevant data. Science 352:1172
Rodrigues-Filho JL, Degani RM, Soares FS, Periotto NA, Blanco FP, Abe DS, Matsumura-Tundisi T, Tundisi JE, Tundisi JG (2015) Alterations in land uses based on amendments to the Brazilian Forest Law and their influences on water quality of a watershed. Braz J Biol 75(1):125–134. https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.08813
SBPC, ABC (Sociedade Brasileira para o Progresso da Ciência, Academia Brasileira de Ciências) (2012) The Brazilian forest code and science: contributions to the dialogue. SBPC, ABC, São Paulo. http://www.sbpcnet.org.br/site/publicacoes/outras-publicacoes/CodigoFlorestal_ingles.pdf. Accessed 08 Dec 2018
Souza PT Jr, Piedade MTF, Candotti E (2011) Brazil’s forest code puts wetlands at risk. Nature 478:458. https://doi.org/10.1038/478458b
Strassburg BBN, Latawiec AE, Barioni LG, Nobre CA, Silva VP, Valentim JF, Vianna M, Assad ED (2014) When enough should be enough: improving the use of current agricultural lands could meet production demands and spare natural habitats in Brazil. Glob Environ Chang 28:8497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.001
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by David Hawksworth.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rodrigues Filho, J.L., Lugli-Bernardes, D., Sabinson, L.M. et al. Incentives for aquaculture in protected areas: possible consequences for biodiversity and its services in southern Brazil. Biodivers Conserv 28, 1297–1300 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-019-01726-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-019-01726-7