Skip to main content
Log in

Ethnographic Clay Sourcing Practices: Insights for Archaeological Assemblage Interpretations

  • Original Article
  • Published:
African Archaeological Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper uses examples of ethnographic clay sourcing strategies from coastal and central Kenyan communities (Digo, Jomvu, Chonyi, Tigania and Mbeere), and potsherds from the Manda archaeological site in Kenya (seventh-fourteenth centuries AD), to illustrate archaeological clay variability and discuss cultural and social behaviour which may contribute to paste inconsistences in an archaeological assemblage. I demonstrate that while function and environmental constraints influence the potters’ decision in the selection of clay sources/treatment, the choice may also be influenced by other factors such as aesthetics, which are dependent on the values of the customer, and in some cases, societal taboos. I also argue that clay sources are not always indicators of production centres, and that heterogeneity and homogeneity in paste composition could imply production centres and customer homesteads respectively.

Résumé

Cet article utilise des exemples ethnographiques de Coastal and central Kenyan collectivités-Digo, Jomvu, Chonyi, Tigania et Mbeere - et poteries archéologiques du site de Manda au Kenya (7e-14e siècles de notre ère) pour illustrer la variabilité de l’argile archéologique et discuter comportements culturels et sociaux qui peuvent contribuer à la variabilité dans un assemblage archéologique. Cet article démontre que bien que la fonction et contraintes environnementales influencent la décision de potier dans la sélection des sources d’argile et de soins, le choix peut également déterminer par d’autres facteurs tels que l’esthétique qui dépendent des valeurs de la client et dans certains tabous sociétaux de cas. Le document affirme également que les sources de production d’argile ne sont pas toujours des indicateurs des centres de production, et que l’hétérogénéité et homogénéité dans collent composition pourrait impliquer des centres de production et de la clientèle propriété familiale respectivement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abungu, G. H. O. (1989). Communities on the River Tana, Kenya: An archaeological study of relations between the delta and river basin 700-1800 AD. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.

  • Abungu, G. H. O. (1994/5). Agriculture and settlement formation along the East African coast. Azania, XXIX-XXX, 248–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, D. E. (2000). Does standardization of ceramic pastes really mean specialization? Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 7(4), 333–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, D. E. (2005). Linking society with the compositional analyses of pottery: A model from comparative ethnography. In A. Livingstone Smith, D. Bosquetand, & R. Martineau (Eds.), Pottery manufacturing processes: Reconstitution and interpretation (pp. 15–32). Oxford: BAR International series 1349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashley, C. Z. (2010). Towards a socialized archaeology of ceramics in Great Lakes Africa. African Archaeological Review, 27, 135–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashley, C. Z., & Grillo, K. M. (2015). Archaeological ceramics from eastern Africa: Past approaches and future directions. Azania, 50(4), 460–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbour, J., & Wandibba, S. (Eds.). (1989). Kenyan pots and potters. Eastern Africa: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowser, B. J. (2005). Transactional politics and the local and regional exchange of pottery resources in the Ecuadorian Amazon. In A. Livingstone Smith, D. Bosquet, & R. Martineau (Eds.), Pottery manufacturing processes: Reconstitution and interpretation (pp. 23–32). Oxford: BAR International series 1349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chami, F. A. (1994). The Tanzanian coast in the first Millennium AD. Uppsala: Societas Archaeologica Upsaliensis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costin, L. C. (1991). Craft specialization: Issues in defining, documenting and explaining the organization of production. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 3, 1–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costin, L. C. (2000). The use of ethnoarchaeology for the archaeological study of ceramic production. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 7(4), 377–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croucher, S. K. (2015). Capitalism and cloves: An archaeology of plantation life on nineteenth-century Zanzibar. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Croucher, S., & Wynne-Jones, S. (2006). People, not pots: Locally produced ceramics and identity on the nineteenth century East African coast. International Journal of African Historical Studies, 39(1), 107–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietler, M., & Herbich, I. (1998). Habitus, techniques style: An integrated approach to the social understanding of material culture and boundaries. In M. T. Stark (Ed.), The archaeology of social boundaries (pp. 232–263). Washington: Smithsonian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eiselt, B. S., & Ford, R. (2007). Sangre de Cristo micaceous clays: Geochemical indices for source and raw material distribution, past and present. Kiva, 73(2), 219–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleisher, J. (2010). Rituals of consumption and the politics of feasting on the Eastern Africa Coast, AD 700-1500. Journal of World Prehistory (Power and Authority in the African Past), 23(4), 195–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleisher, J., & Wynne-Jones, S. (2011). Ceramics and the early Swahili: Deconstructing the Early Tana tradition. African Archaeological Review, 28(4), 245–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosselain, O. P. (2000). Materializing identities: An African perspective. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 7(3), 187–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosselain, O. P., & Livingstone Smith, A. (2005). The source: Clay selection and processing practise in sub-Saharan Africa (pp. 33–47). Oxford: BAR International series 4347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harry, K. G., Frink, L., O’Toole, B., & Andrea, C. (2009). How to make unfired clay cooking pot: Understanding the technological choices made by arctic potters. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 16(1), 33–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkman, J. (1956). The culture of the Kenya coast in the later Middle Ages. Some conclusions from excavations 1948-1956. South African Archaeological Bulletin, 11(44), 89–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kusimba, C. M., Williams, S. R., Oteyo, G., Monge, J. M., Cheong, K., & Mchulla Mohamed, M. (2018). In S. Wynne-Jones & A. LaViolette (Eds.), The Swahili world (pp. 156–162). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone Smith, A. (2000). Processing clay for pottery in northern Cameroon: Social and technical requirements. Archaeometry, 42(1), 21–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone Smith, A. (2005). Introduction. In A. Livingstone Smith, D. Bosquet, & R. Martineau (Eds.), Pottery manufacturing processes: Reconstruction and interpretation (pp. 5–11). Oxford: BAR International Series 1349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loney, L. H. (2000). Society and technological control; a critical review of models of technological change in ceramic studies. American Antiquity, 65(4), 646–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longacre, W. A., Xia, J., & Yang, T. (2000). Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 7(4), 273–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M’Mbogori, F. N. (2015). Populations and ceramic traditions: Revisiting the Tana Ware of coastal Kenya (7th-14th Century AD). In Cambridge Monographs in African Archaeology (vol 89). Oxford: BAR International Series 2717.

  • Msuya, C. S., & Haaland, R. (2000). Pottery, iron working and trade in the Early Iron Age: The case of Dakawa, east-central Tanzania. Azania, XXV, 75–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nurse, D. (1983). History from linguistics: The case of Tana River history. Africa, 10, 207–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlowicz, M. (2013). A review of ceramics from Tanzania, Malawi and northern Mozambique with implications for Swahili archaeology. African Archaeological Review, 30, 367–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pikirayi, I., & Lindahl, A. (2013). Ceramics, ethnohistory, and ethnography: Locating meaning in southern African Iron Age ceramic assemblages. African Archaeological Review, 30, 455–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roux, V. (2007). Ethnoarchaeology: A non-historical science of reference necessary for interpreting the past. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 14(2), 153–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rye, C. E., & Owen, S. (1976). Pottery techniques of Pakistan: Field and laboratory studies. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharks, M., & Tilley, C. (1988). Social theory and archaeology. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinopoli, C. M. (1991). Approaches to archaeological ceramics. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Skibo, J. M. (1998). Pottery and people. In J. M. Skibo & G. M. Feinman (Eds.), Pottery and people: A dynamic interaction (pp. 1–8). Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skibo, J. M., & Schiffer, M. B. (2001). Understanding artefact variability and change: A behavioral framework. In B. Schiffer (Ed.), Anthropology perspectives on technology, Amerind Foundation New World Studies Series (pp. 139–149). Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, M. T., Bishop, R. L., & Miksa, E. (2000). Ceramic technology and social boundaries: Cultural practices in Kalinga clay selection and use. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 7(4), 295–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wandibba, S. (1983). Petrological analysis of the Iron Age pottery in Kenya: Preliminary results. Nyame Akuma, 24, 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, E. C. (2000). Pottery production and microcosmic organization: Residential structure of La Quemada, Zacatecas. Latin American Antiquity, 11(1), 21–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilding, R.F. (1977). The ceramics of the Lamu Archipelago. PhD dissertation, University of Nairobi.

  • Wilmsen, E. N., Killick, D., Rosenstein, D. D., Thebe, P. C., & Denbow, J. R. (2009). The social geography of pottery in Botswana as reconstructed by optical petrography. Journal of African Archaeology, 7(1), 3–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wynne-Jones, S., & Fleisher, J. (2015). Fifty years in the archaeology of the East African coast: A methodological history. Azania, 50(4), 519–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wynne-Jones, S., & Mapunda, B. B. B. (2008). ‘This is what pots look like here’: Ceramics, tradition and consumption on Mafia Island, Tanzania. Azania, XLIII, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

My most sincere gratitude goes to the editors of this journal for their comments which helped to greatly improve this article. I must thank Prof Valentine Roux for her support during the collection of data and after; to Drs Mathew Davies, Stephanie Wayne-Jones, and Prof. Simiyu Wandibba, I say many thanks for their assistance in shaping my arguments. Last but not the least, I am most grateful to all the potters out there who agreed to let me observe and interview them.

Funding

African Archaeological Network and the University of Paris X funded the initial field research and The British Institute in Eastern Africa provided grants for the follow-up field trips. Grantors did not provide any conditions to the grants

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Freda Nkirote M’Mbogori.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Archaeological Period: Iron Age and Ethno-archaeology Region: coast and highlands of Kenya

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

M’Mbogori, F.N. Ethnographic Clay Sourcing Practices: Insights for Archaeological Assemblage Interpretations. Afr Archaeol Rev 35, 597–608 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10437-018-9316-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10437-018-9316-0

Keywords

Navigation