Skip to main content
Log in

Sentinel node biopsy versus elective lymph node dissection in patients with cutaneous melanoma in a Japanese population

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

In Japan, elective lymph node dissection (ELND) has been the standard treatment for patients with possible nodal melanoma. Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) has now replaced ELND, not only in Japan but also worldwide. The objective of this study was to compare the interim outcomes of SNB and ELND.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted among patients with clinically node-negative disease treated at our institute with either SNB (n = 30) or ELND (n = 72).

Results

The background was similar in the two groups. Nodal metastases were found in 40.0% of patients in the SNB group, but in only 26.4% in the ELND group (P = 0.173). The median follow-up was 31.5 months for the SNB group and 82 months for the ELND group. The incidence of locoregional recurrence and distant metastasis in the SNB group was 10.0% and 16.7%, respectively, and for the ELND group the incidence was 5.6% and 31.9%, respectively. The 3-year disease-free survival rate was similar in the two groups (P = 0.280), and the 3-year disease-free survival rates for node-positive patients were also similar in the two groups (P = 0.90), as were the 3-year disease-free survival rates for node-negative patients (P = 0.193).

Conclusion

This interim result in a Japanese melanoma population with clinically node-negative disease demonstrated that SNB identified more nodal micrometastases than ELND. This increase in accurate staging likely resulted from the reliable identification of the lymph node field by lymphoscintigraphy, as well as the more detailed pathologic examination of the nodes removed in SNB. It is quite reasonable to perform SNB instead of ELND in this population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. U Veronesi J Adamus DC Bandiera et al. (1977) ArticleTitleInefficacy of immediate node dissection in stage I melanoma of the limbs N Engl J Med 297 627–630 Occurrence Handle895764 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaE2s3lsVyrsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJM197709222971202

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. FH Sim WF Taylor DJ Pritchard EH Soule (1986) ArticleTitleLymphadenectomy in the management of stage I malignant melanoma: a prospective randomised study Mayo Clin Proc 61 697–705 Occurrence Handle3747613 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL28zgvFKmsg%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. CM Balch S-J Soong AA Bartolucci et al. (1996) ArticleTitleEfficacy of an elective regional lymph node dissection of 1 to 4 mm thick melanomas for patients 60 years of age and younger Ann Surg 224 255–266 Occurrence Handle8813254 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-199609000-00002 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK28vgvVajuw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. T Sugihara T Yoshida T Ohura et al. (1991) ArticleTitleClinical evaluation of cutaneous malignant melanoma with histologically involved lymph node metastases J Dermatol 18 592–597 Occurrence Handle1791239 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK387ms1SrsQ%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. T Sugihara T Yoshida I Kokubu et al. (1994) ArticleTitlePrognostic evaluation of cutaneous malignant melanoma based on the pTNM classification J Dermatol 21 953–959 Occurrence Handle7868768 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2M7ntlakug%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. DL Morton DR Wen JH Wong et al. (1992) ArticleTitleTechnical details of intraoperative lymphatic mapping for early stage melanoma Arch Surg 127 392–399 Occurrence Handle1558490 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK383hsFWjsw%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. JF Thompson WH McCarthy CM Bosch et al. (1995) ArticleTitleSentinel lymph node status as an indicator of the presence of metastatic melanoma in regional lymph nodes Melanoma Res 5 255–260 Occurrence Handle7496161 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00008390-199508000-00008 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK287itVaqsw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. JE Gershenwald W Thompson PE Mansfield et al. (1999) ArticleTitleMulti-institutional melanoma lymphatic mapping experience: the prognostic value of sentinel lymph node status in 612 stage I or II melanoma patients J Clin Oncol 17 976–983 Occurrence Handle10071292 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M7mvVymsg%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. A Tsutsumida H Furukawa Y Yamamoto et al. (2005) ArticleTitleTreatment strategy for cutaneous malignant melanoma Int J Clin Oncol 10 311–317 Occurrence Handle16247657 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10147-005-0522-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. T Ishihara A Nakamura T Kageshita et al. (2001) ArticleTitleSentinel lymph nodes study in 30 cases of melanoma J Dermatol 28 347–352 Occurrence Handle11510501 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mvms1WhsA%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. R Essner A Conforti MC Kelley et al. (1999) ArticleTitleEfficiency of lymphatic mapping, sentinel lymphadenectomy, and selective complete lymph node dissection as a therapeutic procedure for early-stage melanoma Ann Surg Oncol 6 442–449 Occurrence Handle10458681 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10434-999-0442-4 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MzosFylsQ%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. A Doubrovsky RA Scolyer WH McCarthy et al. (2004) ArticleTitleSentinel node biopsy provides more accurate staging than elective lymph node dissection in patients with cutaneous melanoma Ann Surg Oncol 11 829–836 Occurrence Handle15313732 Occurrence Handle10.1245/ASO.2004.01.026 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2cvjs1Wjsw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. A Tsutsumida H Furukawa S Hata et al. (2007) ArticleTitlePrediction of metastases in melanoma patients with positive sentinel node – histological and molecular approach J Dermatol 34 31–36 Occurrence Handle17204098 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1346-8138.2007.00212.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. DL Morton JF Thompson AJ Cochran et al. (2006) ArticleTitleSentinel-node biopsy or nodal observation in melanoma N Engl J Med 355 1307–1317 Occurrence Handle17005948 Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJMoa060992 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXisVaqtr4%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. AJ Cochran BR Balda H Starz et al. (2000) ArticleTitleThe Augsburg Consensus. Techniques of lymphatic mapping, sentinel lymphadenectomy, and completion lymphadenectomy in cutaneous malignancies Cancer 89 236–241 Occurrence Handle10918150 Occurrence Handle10.1002/1097-0142(20000715)89:2<236::AID-CNCR5>3.0.CO;2-0 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3czpt12qsQ%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. RF Uren RB Howman-Giles HM Shaw et al. (1993) ArticleTitleLymphoscintigraphy in high-risk melanoma of the trunk: predicting draining node groups, defining lymphatic channels and locating the sentinel node J Nucl Med 34 1435–1440 Occurrence Handle8355060 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK3szlvF2msg%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuhei Yamamoto.

About this article

Cite this article

Tsutsumida, A., Furukawa, H., Yamamoto, Y. et al. Sentinel node biopsy versus elective lymph node dissection in patients with cutaneous melanoma in a Japanese population. Int J Clin Oncol 12, 245–249 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-007-0667-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-007-0667-9

Key words

Navigation