Skip to main content
Log in

Results of a nationwide questionnaire-based survey on nutrition management following gastric cancer resection in Japan

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

A study was conducted to clarify the actual status of nutrition management after gastric cancer surgery in Japan and obtain basic data for optimizing perioperative nutrition management.

Methods

A questionnaire was sent to 354 hospitals with at least 50 cases of gastric cancer surgery per year. Questions included the perioperative nutrition management and length of hospital stay for patients who underwent gastric cancer surgery within three months of the survey.

Results

Responses were obtained from 242 hospitals (68%; 20,858 patients). Nutrition management was consistent between laparotomy and laparoscopic surgery for 84% of respondents. The number of postoperative days was the most commonly chosen index for starting oral feeding. The most commonly chosen index for hospital dischargeability was diet composition/amount consumed in 182 hospitals (44%), followed by laboratory data stabilization in 106 hospitals (26%), and the number of postoperative days in 87 hospitals (21%). A positive correlation was found between the mean length of postoperative hospital stay and starting oral feeding (r = 0.23 for distal gastrectomy; r = 0.34 for total gastrectomy). The length of hospital stay tended to be shorter with an earlier start of oral feeding (p < 0.01).

Conclusion

Early postoperative oral feeding may be a factor in reducing the length of hospital stay after gastric cancer surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fearon KC, Ljungqvist O, Von Meyenfeldt M, Revhaug A, Dejong CH, Lassen K, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection. Clin Nutr. 2005;24:466–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lassen K, Coolsen MM, Slim K, Carli F, de Aguilar-Nascimento JE, Schäfer M, et al. Guideline for perioperative care for pancreaticoduodenectomy: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) society recommendations. Clin Nutr. 2012;31:817–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Coolsen MM, Wong-Lun-Hing EM, van Dam RM, van der Wilt AA, Slim K, Lassen K, et al. A systematic review of outcomes in patients undergoing liver surgery in an enhanced recovery after surgery pathways. HPB (Oxford). 2013;15:245–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mortensen K, Nilsson M, Slim K, Schäfer M, Mariette C, Braga M, et al. Consensus guideline for enhanced recovery after gastrectomy: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) society recommendations. Br J Surg. 2014;101:1209–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Suehiro T, Matsumata T, Shikada Y, Sugimachi K. Accelerated rehabilitation with early postoperative oral feeding following gastrectomy. Hepatogastroenterology. 2004;51:1852–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hirao M, Tsujinaga T, Takeno A, Fujitani K, Kurata M. Patient-controlled dietary schedule improves clinical outcome after gastrectomy for gastric cancer. World J Surg. 2005;29:853–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yamada T, Hayashi T, Cho H, Yoshikawa T, Taniguchi H, Fukushima R, et al. Usefulness of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol as compared with conventional perioperative care in gastric surgery. Gastric Cancer. 2012;15:34–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sugisawa N, Tokunaga M, Makuuchi R, Miki Y, Tanizawa Y, Bando E, et al. A phase II study of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in gastric cancer surgery. Gastric Cancer. 2016;19:961–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ota H, Ikenaga M, Hasegawa J, Murata K, Miyake Y, Mizushima T, et al. Safety and efficacy of an “enhanced recovery after surgery” protocol for patients undergoing colon cancer surgery: a multi-institutional controlled study. Surg Today. 2016;. doi:10.1007/s00595-016-1423-4.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Seo HS, Song KY, Jeon HM, Park CH. The impact of an increased application of critical pathway for gastrectomy on the length of stay and cost. J Gastric Cancer. 2012;12:126–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Kreys ED, Koeller JM. Documenting the benefits and cost saving of a large multistate cancer pathway program from a payer’s perspective. J Oncol Pract. 2013;9:e241–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jones DE, Sutcliffe K, Pairman J, Willton K, Newton JL. An integrated care pathway improves quality of life in primary biliary cirrhosis. QJM. 2008;101:535–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Association Japanese Gastric Cancer. Gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver. 4). Gastric Cancer. 2017;20:1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kumagai K, Shimizu K, Yokoyama N, Aida S, Arima S, Aikou T, et al. Questionnaire survey regarding the current status and controversial issues concerning reconstruction after gastrectomy in Japan. Surg Today. 2012;42:411–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Association Japanese Gastric Cancer. Gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3). Gastric Cancer. 2011;14:113–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kurokawa Y, Katai H, Fukuda H, Sasako M, Gastric Cancer Surgical Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group. Phase II study of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage I gastric cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0703. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2008;38:501–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Katai H, Sasako M, Fukuda H, Nakamura K, Hiki N, Saka M, et al. Safety and feasibility of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with suprapancreatic nodal dissection for clinical stage I gastric cancer: a multicenter phase II trial (JCOG 0703). Gastric Cancer. 2010;13:238–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Laviano A, Meguid MM, Inui A, Muscaritoli M, Rossi-Fanelli F. Therapy insight: cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome–when all you can eat is yourself. Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2005;2:158–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Liedman B, Andersson H, Bosaeus I, Hugosson I, Lundell L. Changes in body composition after gastrectomy: results of a controlled, prospective clinical trial. World J Surg. 1997;21:416–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Davis JL, Selby LV, Chou JF, Schattner M, Ilson DH, Capanu M, et al. Patterns and predictors of weight loss after gastrectomy for cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:1639–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Rino Y, Oshima T, Yoshikawa T. Changes in fat-soluble vitamin levels after gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Surg Today. 2017;47:145–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ri M, Miyata H, Aikou S, Seto Y, Akazawa K, Takeuchi M, et al. Effect of body mass index (BMI) on surgical outcomes: a nationwide survey using a Japanese web-based database. Surg Today. 2015;45:1271–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Okamura Y, Sugiura T, Ito T, Yamamoto Y, Ashida R, Uesaka K. The optimal cut-off value of the preoperative prognostic nutritional index for the survival differs according to the TNM stage in hepatocellular carcinoma. Surg Today. 2017;. doi:10.1007/s00595-017-1491-0.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lee HO, Han SR, Choi SI, Lee JJ, Kim SH, Ahn HS, et al. Effects of intensive nutrition education on nutritional status and quality of life among postoperative gastrectomy patients. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2016;90:79–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the medical institutions listed in the Online Resource for their cooperation in the study. This study was conducted on a research contract from EN Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nobuyuki Shimizu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors and corresponding authors have no conflicts of interest for EN Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 111 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shimizu, N., Hatao, F., Fukatsu, K. et al. Results of a nationwide questionnaire-based survey on nutrition management following gastric cancer resection in Japan. Surg Today 47, 1460–1468 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-017-1552-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-017-1552-4

Keywords

Navigation