Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Is right laparoscopic donor nephrectomy right?

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy has become the standard of care in many renal transplant centers. Many centers are reluctant to perform right laparoscopic donor nephrectomies, primarily due to concerns about transplanting a kidney with a short renal vein.

Methods

A retrospective review of 26 right and 24 left consecutive donor nephrectomies and their recipients was performed. Patient demographics, preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative data were recorded and compared.

Results

Patient demographics were similar between groups. Multiple vessels were encountered more frequently on the right side (10 vs. 3, p = 0.04) and the donated kidney had lesser preoperative function in the right group as determined by nuclear medicine imaging (46.5% vs. 49.4%, p < 0.001). Donor operating times were less in the right group (198 vs. 226 min, p = 0.016). There was no difference in implantation difficulty as demonstrated by similar operative and warm ischemia times. Complication rates were similar between both groups of donors and recipients.

Conclusions

Right laparoscopic donor nephrectomy requires less operating time than, and is associated with similar outcomes for donors and recipients as, left laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Right laparoscopic donor nephrectomy may be preferable in general and should be considered when multiple renal vessels are present on the left side and/or when preoperative function of the left kidney is greater than the right.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brook NR, Nicholson ML (2003) Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Br J Surg 90(11):1313–1314

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Burgos J (2007) Is reluctance to right-sided laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy justified? Eur Urol 51(5):1171–1172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Del Pizzo JJ, Sklar GN, You-Cheong JW, Levin B, Krebs T, Jacobs SC (1999) Helical computerized tomography arteriography for evaluation of live renal donors undergoing laparoscopic nephrectomy. J Urol 162(1):31–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Diner E, Radolinski B, Murdock J, Ghasemian SR (2006) Right laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: the Washington hospital center experience. Urology 68(6):1175–1177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fisher PC, Montgomery JS, Johnston WK 3rd, Wolf JS Jr (2006) 200 consecutive hand assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomies: evolution of operative technique and outcomes. J Urol 175(4):1439–1443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Handschin AE, Weber M, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2003) Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Br J Surg 90(11):1323–1332

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kay MD, Brook N, Kaushik M, Harper SJ, Bagul A, Nicholson ML (2006) Comparison of right and left laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. BJU Int 98(4):843–844

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim FJ, Ratner LE, Kavoussi LR (2000) Renal transplantation: laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Urol Clin North Am 27(4):777–785

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kok NF, Lind MY, Hansson BM, Pilzecker D, Mertens zur Borg IR, Knipscheer BC, Hazebroek EJ, Dooper IM, Weimar W, Hop WC, Adang EM, van der Wilt GJ, Bonjer HJ, van der Vliet JA, IJzermans JN (2006) Comparison of laparoscopic and mini incision open donor nephrectomy: single blind, randomised controlled clinical trial. BMJ 333(7561):221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Leventhal J, Kocak B, Salvalaggio PO, Koffron A, Baker T, Kaufman D, Fryer J, Abecassis M, Stuart F (2004) Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy 1997 to 2003: lessons learned with 500 cases at a single institution. Surgery 136(4):881–890

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lewis GR, Mulcahy K, Brook NR, Veitch PS, Nicholson ML (2004) A prospective study of the predictive power of spiral computed tomographic angiography for defining renal vascular anatomy before live-donor nephrectomy. BJU Int 94(7):1077–1081

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu KL, Chiang YJ, Wu CT, Lai WJ, Wang HH, Chu SH (2006) Why we consistently use the left donor kidney in living related transplantation: initial experience of right laparoscopic donor nephrectomy and comparison with left nephrectomy. Transplant Proc 38(7):1977–1979

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Morrissey PE, Monaco AP (2006) Living kidney donation: evolution and technical aspects of donor nephrectomy. Surg Clin North Am 86(5):1219–1235, vii

    Google Scholar 

  14. Novotny MJ (2001) Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Urol Clin North Am 28(1):127–135

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Posselt AM, Mahanty H, Kang SM, Stoller ML, Meng MV, Roberts JP, Freise CE (2004) Laparoscopic right donor nephrectomy: a large single-center experience. Transplantation 78(11):1665–1669

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ratner LE, Montgomery RA, Kavoussi LR (2001) Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. A review of the first 5 years. Urol Clin North Am 28(4):709–719

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Su LM, Ratner LE, Montgomery RA, Jarrett TW, Trock BJ, Sinkov V, Bluebond-Langner R, Kavoussi LR (2004) Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: trends in donor and recipient morbidity following 381 consecutive cases. Ann Surg 240(2):358–363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tooher RL, Rao MM, Scott DF, Wall DR, Francis DM, Bridgewater FH, Maddern GJ (2004) A systematic review of laparoscopic live-donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 78(3):404–414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Dalhousie University, Room 8-838 Victoria Bldg, QEII HSC, 1278 Tower Road, Halifax, NS, Canada, B3H 2Y9

    Mark Sawatzky, Abdulmalik Altaf, James Ellsmere, Dennis Klassen, Mark Walsh, Michele Molinari, Björn Nashan & Jaap Bonjer

Authors
  1. Mark Sawatzky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Abdulmalik Altaf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. James Ellsmere
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dennis Klassen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mark Walsh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Michele Molinari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Björn Nashan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jaap Bonjer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jaap Bonjer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sawatzky, M., Altaf, A., Ellsmere, J. et al. Is right laparoscopic donor nephrectomy right?. Surg Endosc 23, 1321–1325 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0158-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0158-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation