Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis
Bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis (BPS/IC) is a chronic and debilitating condition. Our objective was to compare two different bladder instillation treatments in patients with BPS/IC: dimethyl sulfoxide with triamcinolone (DMSO) vs. bupivacaine with heparin and triamcinolone (B/H/T). Our hypothesis was that both treatments are equally effective.
Methods
A retrospective cohort study of instillation-naïve patients was conducted comparing responses to either DMSO or B/H/T at our tertiary urogynecology center from 2012 to 2014. The primary outcome was patient-reported percent of overall improvement from baseline. Secondary outcomes were change in patient-reported daytime voiding frequency (hours) and change in number of nighttime voiding episodes. Variables analyzed as potential confounders included pelvic pain, cystoscopy findings, levator spasm, and fibromyalgia. The two-sided Student’s t test, chi-squared test, Poisson regression, and repeated-measure analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used for analyses.
Results
One hundred and ninety-three eligible patients were identified (45 receiving DMSO, 146 receiving B/H/T). Compared with baseline, DMSO patients reported 63% improvement (p < 0.0001), increased time between daytime voids by 1.5 h (p < 0.00), and a 40% reduction in nocturia episodes (p < 0.00). B/H/T patients reported 51% improvement (p < 0.00), increased time between daytime voids by 1.4 h (p < 0.00), and an 8% reduction in nocturia episodes (p = 0.26). When comparing the two treatments, DMSO resulted in a greater percentage of overall improvement (p = 0.02) and a significant decrease in nocturia episodes when compared with B/H/T (p = 0.02). There was no significant difference between treatments for daytime voiding frequency (p = 0.50).
Conclusion
Bladder instillations with DMSO or B/H/T provide overall symptomatic improvement and improved frequency and nocturia. DMSO appears to provide greater improvement in nocturia and overall.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Neuhaus J, Schwalenberg T. Intravesical treatments of bladder pain syndrome/ interstitial cystitis” Nature reviews. Urology. 2012;9:707–20.
Hanno PM, Erickson P, Moldwin R, Faraday MM. American Urological Association. Diagnosis and treatment of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome. J Urol. 2015;193(5):1545–53.
Gafni-Kane A, Botros S, Du H, Sand RI, Sand PK. Measuring the success of combined intravesical dimethyl sulfoxide and triamcinolone for treatment of bladder pain syndrome/ interstitial cystitis. Int Urogynecol K. 2013;24:303–11.
Welk B, Teichman J. Dysparunia response in patients with interstitial cystitis treated with intravesical lidocaine, bicarbonate, and heparin. J Urology. 2008;71(1):67–70.
Colaco M, Evans RJ. Current recommendations for bladder instillation therapy in the treatment of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome. Curr Urol Rep. 2013;14:442–7.
Perez-Marrero R, Emerson LE, Feltis JT. A controlled study of dimethyl sulfoxide in interstitial cystitis. J Urol. 1988;140:36.
Peeker R, Haghsheno MA, Holmang S, Fall, M. Intravesical baculus calmette-geurin and dimethyl sulfoxide for treatment of classic and nonlcer interstitial cystitis: a prospective randomized double blind study. J Urol. 164:1912–1916.
Parsons CL et al. Alkalinized lidocaine and heparin provide immediate relief of pain and urgency in patients with interstitial cystitis. J Sex Med. 2012;9:207.
Dawson TE, Jamison J. Intravesical treatments for painful bladder syndrome/ interstitial cystitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;4:CD006113.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
No outside funding was received.
Conflicts of interest
None.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Iyer, S., Lotsof, E., Zhou, Y. et al. Which bladder instillations are more effective? DMSO vs. bupivacaine/heparin/triamcinolone: a retrospective study. Int Urogynecol J 28, 1335–1340 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3266-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3266-y