Abstract
I compare the predictions of three variants of the altruistic parent model of Barro and Becker for the relationship between child mortality and fertility. In the baseline model fertility choice is continuous, and there is no uncertainty over the number of surviving children. The baseline model is contrasted to an extension with discrete fertility choice and stochastic mortality and a setup with sequential fertility choice. The quantitative predictions of the models are remarkably similar. While in each model the total fertility rate falls as child mortality declines, the number of surviving children increases. The results suggest that factors other than declining infant and child mortality are responsible for the large decline in net reproduction rates observed in industrialized countries over the last century.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Financial support by the National Science Foundation (grant SES-0217051) and the UCLA Academic Senate is gratefully acknowledged. I thank Sebnem Kalemli-Oczan, Rodrigo Soares, and two anonymous referees for comments that helped to substantially improve the paper. Olesya Baker and Ilya Berger provided excellent research assistance.
Responsible editor: Junsen Zhang.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Doepke, M. Child mortality and fertility decline: Does the Barro-Becker model fit the facts?. J Popul Econ 18, 337–366 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-004-0208-z
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-004-0208-z