Abstract
The multifractal formalism [1,2], which originated in the context of turbulence and chaotic systems [3], has become a standard tool to analyze phenomena observed in fractal aggregates, semiconductors, disordered systems and so on [4]. To describe a multifractal set one usually divides it into small boxes (of size ℓ say) and introduces a partition sum of order q (or a generalized correlation function), C q(ℓ), defined as the sum over the box-probabilities, each raised to a power q. From the scaling behavior C q(ℓ) ~ ℓτ(q), the multifractal f(α) spectrum then follows from a Legendre transform of τ(q) [1,2]. To obtain the entire f(α) spectrum the moment q must vary from -∞ to +∞. Sometimes this demands very cumbersome calculations and it can be hard to obtain a good convergence of the scaling exponents. Instead by using the concept of multiscaling it is possible to obtain a part of the f(α) spectrum by calculating only one moment of the partition sum (or one correlation function). The idea of multiscaling was introduced by Kadanoff and co-workers to account for the scaling behavior of power spectra of temperature signals obtained in convective turbulence [5] and to describe distribution functions computed in simple models for sandpiles [6]. It was found that standard finite size scaling given by a few exponents did not describe the data satisfactory. Instead, by the multiscaling ansatz, the data could be nicely fitted using an infinity of scaling exponents. Recently, it was shown that it is possible to relate the concepts of multiscaling and multifractality to each other in a very natural way, namely by introducing a lower cut-off in the calculation of the correlation functions [7]. As this cut-off varies, a cross-over in the scaling of the correlation function C q(ℓ) appears at a certain length scale. Below this length scale the correlation function stops being a power law, and this cross-over point moves as the cut-off varies. Using the multiscaling idea one then rescales the various correlation curves and collapse then onto a single scaling function (apart a small correction) of which a section is given by the f(α) spectrum. Again, this means that we obtain the multifractal spectrum from calculating only one moment in the partition sum. In turbulence, this type of behavior appears very naturally, if a multifractal model is assumed [8]. Here one can relate various values of the scaling exponents to various dissipative cut-offs [4]. In order words, there will be different viscous cut-offs (for each value of the scaling exponent) occurring at different length scales as one moves below the Kolmogorov inner scale. This defines a kind of intermediate viscous regime, which again by a multiscaling transformation can be rescaled onto one curve, part of which is the singularity spectrum for turbulence [8].
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
U. Frisch and G. Parisi, “Varanna School LXXXXVIII”, M. Ghil, R. Benzi, and G. Parisi, eds., North-Holland, New York (1985), p.84; R. Benzi, G. Paladin, G. Parisi, and A. Vulpiani, J.Phys.A 17, 352 (1984).
T.C. Halsey, M.H. Jensen, L.P. Kadanoff, I. Procaccia, and B.I. Shraiman, Phys.Rev.A 33, 1141 (1986); M.H. Jensen, L.P. Kadanoff, A. Libchaber, I. Procaccia, and J. Stavans, Phys.Rev.Lett. 55, 2798 (1985).
B.B. Mandelbrot, J.Fluid.Mech. 62, 331 (1974).
See e.g. G. Paladin and A. Vulpiani, Phys.Rep. 156, 147 (1987), and references therein.
X.-Z. Wu, L.P. Kadanoff, A. Libchaber, and M. Sano, Phys.Rev.Lett. 64, 2140 (1990).
L.P. Kadanoff, S.R. Nagel, L. Wu, and S.-M. Zhou, Phys.Rev.A 39, 6524 (1989).
M.H. Jensen, G. Paladin and A. Vulpiani, “Mutliscaling in Multifractals”, NORDITA Preprint (1991).
U. Frisch and M. Vergassola, Europhys.Lett. 14, 439 (1991).
P. Grassberger Phys. Lett. 97 A, 227 (1983); H.G.E. Hentschel and I. Procaccia. Physica 8 D, 435 (1983)
P. Cvitanović, in proceedings of “XIV Colloqium on Group Theoretical Methods in Physics”, ed. R. Gilmore (World Scientific, Singapore 1987); in “Non-Linear Evolution and Chaotic Phenomena”, eds. P. Zweifel, G. Gallavotti and M. Anile (Plenum, New York, 1988).
G.H. Gunaratne and I. Procaccia, Phys.Rev.Lett. 59, 1377 (1987).
M.H. Jensen, Phys.Rev.Lett. 60, 1680 (1988).
C. Amitrano, A. Coniglio, and F. di Liberto, Phys.Rev.Lett. 57, 1098 (1986); J. Nittmann, H.E. Stanley, E. Touboul, and G. Daccord, Phys.Rev.Lett. 58, 619 (1987); K.J. Måløy, F. Boger, J. Feder, and T. Jøssang, in “Time-Dependent Effects in Disordered Materials”, Eds. R. Pynn and T. Riste, p.111 (Plenum, New York, 1987).
T. Bohr, P. Cvitanović, and M.H. Jensen, Europhys.Lett. 6, 445 (1988).
J. Lee and H.E. Stanley, Phys.Rev.Lett. 61, 2945 (1988).
R. Blumenfeld and A. Aharony, Phys.Rev.Lett. 62, 2977 (1989); B. Fourcade and A.M. Tremblay, Phys.Rev.Lett. 64, 1842 (1990).
A general scaling approach is consistent with a scaling exponent that depends on the length instead of being a constant. This idea was originally proposed by A. Coniglio and M. Marinaro Physica 54, 261 (1971).
In the context of multifractals, the multiscaling has been discussed by A. Coniglio and M. Zannetti, Physica 38 D, 37 (1989), C. Tang unpublished, and also P. Meakin, A. Coniglio, H.E. Stanley, and T.A. Witten Phys. Rev A 34, 3325 (1986).
M.J. Feigenbaum, J.Stat.Phys. 19, 25 (1978); 21, 669 (1979).
C.M. Meneveau and K.R. Sreenivasan, Nucl. Phys. B Proc.Suppl. 2, 49 (1987); C.M. Meneveau and K.R. Sreenivasan, P. Kailasnath and M.S. Fan, Phys. Rev.A 41, 894 (1990); C.M. Meneveau and K.R. Sreenivasan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 1424 (1987); K.R. Sreenivasan and C.M. Meneveau, Phys. Rev. A 38, 6287 (1988).
E. D. Siggia, J. Fluid Mech. 107, 375 (1981).
F. Anselmet, Y. Gagne, E.J. Hopfinger and R. Antonia, J. Fluid Mech. 140, 63 (1984).
I. Hosokawa and K. Yamamoto, J. Phys. Soc. of Japan 59, 401 (1990).
M.H. Jensen, G. Paladin and A. Vulpiani, Phys.Rev.A 43, 798 (1991).
E.B. Gledzer, Sov. Phys. Dokl. 18, 216 (1973).
E.D. Siggia, Phys. Rev.A 15, 1730 (1977); E.D. Siggia, Phys. Rev.A 17, 1166 (1978); R.M. Kerr and E.D. Siggia, J. Stat. Phys. 19, 543 (1978).
R. Grappin, J. Leorat and A. Pouquet, J. Physique 47, 1127 (1986).
M. Yamada and K. Ohkitani, J. Phys. Soc. of Japan 56, 4210 (1987); M. Yamada and K. Ohkitani, Progr. Theo. Phys. 79, 1265 (1988); M. Yamada and K. Ohkitani, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 983 (1988).
K. Ohkitani and M. Yamada, Progr. Theo. Phys. 81, 329 (1989).
H.A. Rose and P.L. Sulem, J. Physique 39, 441 (1978).
P. Bak, private communication; K. Chen, P. Bak and M.H. Jensen, Phys.Lett.A 149, 207 (1990).
D. Ruelle, Comm. Math. Phys. 87, 287 (1982).
R. Livi, M. Pettini, S. Ruffo and A. Vulpiani, J. Stat. Phys. 48, 530 (1987).
M.H. Jensen, G. Paladin and A. Vulpiani, to be published (1991).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jensen, M.H. (1991). Multifractals, Multiscaling and the Energy Cascade of Turbulence. In: Riste, T., Sherrington, D. (eds) Spontaneous Formation of Space-Time Structures and Criticality. NATO ASI Series, vol 349. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3508-5_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3508-5_22
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5551-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3508-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive