Skip to main content

Conservation Biology of California’s Remnant Native Grasslands

  • Chapter
Grassland structure and function

Part of the book series: Tasks for vegetation science ((TAVS,volume 20))

Abstract

From alpine meadows ravaged by sheep grazing a century ago to desert flats impacted by off road vehicles during the past two decades. California bears heavy scars from its relatively short history since the first Europeans arrived. But none of California’s landscape has been so irreparably altered as its grasslands. These grasslands have undergone habitat conversion including cultivation, grazing, suburbanization and industrialization. They have been subjected, in addition, to a somewhat more subtle change that has reduced the natural California grassland vegetation to but a fraction of its original extent. Here we discuss this change, the near complete replacement of California’s grassland flora with European annual grasses and forbs. We then assess the biogeography and pertinent ecology of the few remaining fragments of habitat on serpentine soils that maintain some of the original flora, and discuss how those remnants might best be conserved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Burcham LT (1957) California range land. Sacramento, California Forestry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheatham NH (1976) Conservation of vernal pools, Institute of Ecology Pub. 9, U.C. Davis, pp 87–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich PR and Murphy DD (1987) Monitoring populations on remnants of native vegetation. In Saunders, DA, Arnold GW, Burbidge AA, and Hopkins AJM, eds. Nature Conservation: The Role of Remnants of Native Vegetation, pp 201–210. Surrey Beatty and Sons Pty Limited in association with CSIRO and CALM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich PR, Murphy DD, Singer MC, White RR, Brown IL, and Sherwood C (1980) Extinction, reduction, stability, and increase: the responses of checkerspot butterfly (Euphydryas) populations to the California drought, Oecologia 46, 101–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulmon SL (1979) Competition and coexistence: Three annual grass species, The Am. Midland Nat. 101 (2), 403–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulmon SL, Chiariello NR, Mooney HA, and Chu, CC (1983) Phenology and resource use in three co-occurring grassland annuals, Oecologia 58, 33–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heady HF (1977) Valley grassland. In Barbour M and Major J, eds. Terrestrial vegetation of California, pp. 491–514. New York, Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain S, ed. (1976) Vernal pools, their ecology and conservation. Institute of Ecology, Pub. 9, U.C. Davis

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruckeberg, AR (1984) California serpentines: flora, vegetation, geology, soils, and management problems. Berkeley, Univ. Calif. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur RH and Wilson EO (1967) The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy DD (1984) Butterflies and their nectar plants: the role of the checkerspot butterfly Euphydryas editha as a pollen vector, Oikos 43, 113–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy DD and Ehrlich PR (1980) Two California checkerspot butterfly subspecies: One new, one on the verge of extinction, J. Lepid. Soc. 34, 316–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy DD and White RR (1984) Rainfall, resources and dispersal in southern populations of Euphydryas editha (Lepidoptera:Nympbalidac), Pan-Pac. Ent. 60, 350–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy DD and Wilcox BA (1986) Butterfly diversity in natural forest fragments: a test of the validity of vertebrate-based management. In Verner J. Morrison ML, and Ralph J, eds. Wildlife 2000: Modelling Wildlife Habitat Relationships of Terrestrial Vertebrates. Madison, Wisconsin, University of Wiscons in Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell JA (1969) A synopsis of nearctic adelid moths, with descriptions of new species (Incurvariidae), J. Lepid. Soc. 23, 211–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prescott-Allen R and Prescott-Allen C (1983) Genes From the Wild. London, Int. Inst. Environ. Am. Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riebesell JF (1982) Arctic-alpine plants on mountaintops: agreement with island biogeographic theory. Amer. Nat. 119, 657–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt J (1983) Density-dependent pollinator foraging, flowering phenology, and temporal pollen dispersal patterns in Linanthus bicolor, Evolution 37, 1247–1257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer MC (1971) Ecological studies on the butterfly (Euphydryas editha). Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University..

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer MC and Ehrlich PR (1979) Population dynamics of the checkerspot butterfly Euphydryas editha, Fortsch. Zool. 225, 53–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terborgh J (1974) Preservation of natural diversity: the problem of extinction prone species, Bioscience 24, 715–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells PV (1983) Paleobiogeography of montane islands in the Great Basin since the last glaciopluvial, Ecol. Monogr. 53, 341–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox BA (1980) Insular ecology and conservation. In Soule ME and Wilcox BA, eds. Conservation biology: an evolutionary-ecological perspective. Sunderland, Mass., Sinauer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox BA and Murphy DD (1985) Conservation strategy: the effects of fragmentation on extinction, Amer. Nat. 125, 879–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Murphy, D.D., Ehrlich, P.R. (1989). Conservation Biology of California’s Remnant Native Grasslands. In: Huenneke, L.F., Mooney, H.A. (eds) Grassland structure and function. Tasks for vegetation science, vol 20. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3113-8_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3113-8_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7900-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-3113-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics