Skip to main content

Top-Down and Bottom-Up Tree Search Algorithms for Selecting Bases in Wavelet Packet Transforms

  • Chapter
Wavelets and Statistics

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Statistics ((LNS,volume 103))

Abstract

Search algorithms for finding signal decompositions called near-best bases using decision criteria called non-additive information costs have recently been proposed by Taswell [12] for selecting bases in wavelet packet transforms represented as binary trees. These methods are extended here to distinguish between top-down and bottom-up tree searches. Other new non-additive information cost functions are also proposed. In particular, the near-best basis with the non-additive cost of the Shannon entropy on probabilities is compared against the best basis with the additive cost of the Coifman-Wickerhauser entropy on energies [3]. All wavelet packet basis decompositions are also compared with the nonorthogonal matching pursuit decomposition of Mallat and Zhang [7] and the orthogonal matching pursuit decomposition of Patiet al [8]. Monte Carlo experiments using a constant-bit-rate variable-distortion paradigm for lossy compression suggest that the statistical performance of top-down near-best bases with non-additive costs is superior to that of bottom-up best bases with additive costs. Top-down near-best bases provide a significant increase in computational efficiency with reductions in memory, flops, and time while nevertheless maintaining similar coding efficiency with comparable re-construction errors measured by ℓp-norms. Finally, a new compression scheme called parameterized model coding is introduced and demonstrated with results showing better compression than standard scalar quantization coding at comparable levels of distortion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Joseph Berkson. Relative precision of minimum chi-square and maximum likelihood estimates of regression coefficients. In Jerzy Neyman, editor,Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, pages 471–479. University of California Press, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Albert Cohen, Ingrid Daubechies, and Pierre Vial. Wavelets on the interval and fast wavelet transforms.Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis, 1 (1): 54–81, December 1993.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Ronald R. Coifman and Mladen Victor Wickerhauser. Entropy-based algorithms for best basis selection.IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 38 (2): 713–718, March 1992.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Ingrid Daubechies. Orthonormal bases of compactly supported wavelets: Ii. variations on a theme.SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 24 (2): 499–519, March 1993.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. David L. Donoho. Unconditional bases are optimal bases for data compression and for statistical estimation.Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis, 1 (1): 100–115, December 1993.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. A. I. Khinchin.Mathematical Foundations of Information Theory. Dover Publications, Inc., New York, 1957.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Stephane G. Mallat and Zhifeng Zhang. Matching pursuits with time-frequency dictionaries.IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 41 (12): 3397–3415, December 1993.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Y.C. Pati, R. Rezaiifar, and P. S. Krishnaprasad. Orthogonal matching pursuit: Recursive function approximation with application to wavelet decomposition. InProceedings of the 27th Annual Asilomar Conference on Signals Systems and Computers, pages 40–44, Pacific Grove, CA, November 1993.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Kannan Ramchandran and Martin Vetterli. Best wavelet packet bases in a rate-distortion sense.IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2 (2): 160–175, April 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. David A. Ratkowsky.Handbook of Nonlinear Regression Models, volume 107 ofStatistics: Textbooks and Monographs. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, NY, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  11. David W. Scott.Multivariate Density Estimation: Theory, Practice, and Visualization. Wiley Series in Applied Probability and Statistics. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Carl Taswell. Near-best basis selection algorithms with non-additive information cost functions. In Moeness G. Amin, editor,Proceedings of the IEEE-SP International Symposium on Time-Frequency and Time-Scale Analysis, pages 13–16, Philadelphia, PA, October 1994. IEEE Press 94TH8007.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Carl Taswell. WavBox 4: A software toolbox for wavelet transforms and adaptive wavelet packet decompositions. In Anestis Antoniadis and Georges Oppenheim, editors,Wavelets and Statistics, Lecture Notes in Statistics. Springer Verlag, 1995. Proceedings of the Villard de Lans Conference November 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Carl Taswell and Kevin C. McGill. Algorithm 735: Wavelet transform algorithms for finite- duration discrete-time signals. ACMTransactions on Mathematical Software, 20 (3): 398–412, September 1994.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Mladen Victor Wickerhauser . INRIA lectures on wavelet packet algorithms. Technical report, INRIA, Roquencourt, France, 1991. minicourse lecture notes.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Taswell, C. (1995). Top-Down and Bottom-Up Tree Search Algorithms for Selecting Bases in Wavelet Packet Transforms. In: Antoniadis, A., Oppenheim, G. (eds) Wavelets and Statistics. Lecture Notes in Statistics, vol 103. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2544-7_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2544-7_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-94564-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-2544-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics