Skip to main content

Fine-Needle Aspiration versus Core Needle Biopsy for Diagnosis of Nonpalpable and Palpable Breast Lesions

  • Chapter
Book cover Breast Cancer

Part of the book series: M.D. Anderson Solid Tumor Oncology Series ((MDA))

Abstract

Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology of the breast is a historically validated procedure, although its usefulness compared with that of other minimally invasive methods of tissue procurement is controversial. Core needle biopsy (CNB), performed with a variety of devices, has gained popularity for evaluating nonpalpable breast lesions. CNB devices are also being considered for evaluating palpable breast lesions in conjunction with or as a replacement for FNA. A review of the literature with emphasis on comparing FNA with CNB for the diagnosis of nonpalpable and palpable breast abnormalities is presented herein.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Sneige N. A comparison of fine-needle aspiration, core biopsy, and needle localization biopsy techniques in mammographically detectable nonpalpable breast lesions. Pathol Case Rev 1997;1:6–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sneige N. Fine-needle aspiration of the breast: a review of 1,995 cases with emphasis on diagnostic pitfalls. Diagn Cytopathol 1993;9:106–112.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dowlatshahi K, Yaremko ML, Kluskens LF, et al. Nonpalpable breast lesions: findings of stereotactic needle-core biopsy and fine-needle aspiration cytology. Radiology 1991;181:745–750.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Pisano ED, Fajardo LL, Tsimikas J, et al. Rate of insufficient samples for fine-needle aspiration for nonpalpable breast lesions in a multicenter clinical trial. Cancer 1998;82:679–688.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hayes MK, DeBruhl ND, Hirschowitz S, et al. Mammographically guided fine-needle aspiration cytology of the breast: reducing the rate of insufficient specimens. Am J Radiol 1996;167:381–384.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ballo SM, Sneige N. Can core needle biopsy replace fine-needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of palpable breast carcinoma? A comparative study of 124 women. Cancer 1996;78:773–777.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Khanna AK, Singh MR, Khanna S, et al. Fine needle aspiration cytology, imprint cytology and Tru-Cut needle biopsy in breast lumps: a comparative evaluation. J Indian Med Assoc 1991;89:192–195.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Shabot MM, Goldberg IM, Schick P, et al. Aspiration cytology is superior to Tru-Cut needle biopsy in establishing the diagnosis of clinically suspicious breast masses. Ann Surg 1982;196:122–126.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dixon JM, Lee EC, Cruciolli V. Frozen section of Tru-Cut biopsies versus cytology. Br J Surg 1986;73:324–325.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Elston CW, Cotton RE, Davies CJ, et al. A comparison of the use of the Tru-Cut needle and fine needle aspiration cytology in the preoperative diagnosis of carcinoma of the breast. Histopathology 1978;2:239–254.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Owen AW, Anderson TJ, Forrest AP. “Closed” biopsy for breast cancer. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1980;25:237–241.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Davies CJ, Elston CW, Cotton RE, et al. Tru-Cut needle biopsy versus fine needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of primary breast cancer [abstract]. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 1977;3:123.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dixon JM, Lamb J, Anderson TJ. Fine needle aspiration of the breast: importance of the aspirator. Lancet 1983;2:564.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Parker SH, Burbank F, Jackman RJ, et al. Percutaneous large-core breast biopsy: a multi-institutional study. Radiology 1994;193:359–364.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Parker SH. Percutaneous large core breast biopsy. Cancer 1994;74:256–262.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Boerner S, Sneige N. Ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology of nonpalpable breast lesions: diagnostic categories and their likelihood of benign and malignant findings [abstract]. Mod Pathol 1997;10:32A.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jackman RJ, Nowles KW, Shepard MJ, et al. Stereotaxic large-core needle biopsy of 450 nonpalpable breast lesions with surgical correlation in lesions with cancer or atypical hyperplasia. Radiology 1994;193:91–95.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Rosen PP, et al. Stereotaxic core biopsy of breast carcinoma: accuracy at predicting invasion. Radiology 1995;194:379–381.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mitnick JS, Vazquez MF, Pressman PI, et al. Stereotactic fine-needle aspiration biopsy for the evaluation of nonpalpable breast lesions: report of an experience based on 2,988 cases. Ann Surg Oncol 1996;3:185–191.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Reynolds HE, Jackson VP, Gin FM, et al. Large-gauge core needle biopsy of the breast. Breast J 1996;1:370–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fornage BD, Coan JD, David CL. Ultrasound-guided needle biopsy of the breast and other interventional procedures. Radiol Clin North Am 1992;30:167–185.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sneige N, Fornage B, Saleh G. Ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of nonpalpable breast lesions: cytologic and histologic findings. Am J Clin Pathol 1994;102: 98–101.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sneige, N. (1999). Fine-Needle Aspiration versus Core Needle Biopsy for Diagnosis of Nonpalpable and Palpable Breast Lesions. In: Singletary, S.E. (eds) Breast Cancer. M.D. Anderson Solid Tumor Oncology Series. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2146-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2146-3_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7432-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-2146-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics