Population estimate is one of the most widely used products of demographic analyses (Murdock and Ellis 1991). Population estimates for the state, counties, and places are essential for planning of different types of services, such as health care, schools, highways, water, and sewer. Planning for health services requires accurate information on the number of older people (aged 60 and over), their age, sex, marital status, distribution in different areas, and rural or urban residence. Population estimates provide a basis for allocation of resources between areas in relation to population size. The federal government uses the Census Bureau’s national and subnational population estimates in calculating the distribution of many billions of dollars in the form of block grants each year to the states and jurisdictions within them. Some state governments use State Data Center (SDC) population estimates to administer the state revenue sharing program. For example, the State of Florida uses its population estimates to distribute more than $1.5 billion each year to local governments (Smith and Cody 2004). Population estimates are also necessary to provide denominators to compute many types of rates and ratios, such as birth rates, death rates, labor force participation rates, school enrollment rates, dependency ratios, and sex ratios in non-census years. Population estimates play an important role in market analysis, public facility, and environmental planning and form a major basis for determining the present and future markets for a variety of goods and services and for other aspects of private-sector planning and marketing efforts (Murdock and Ellis 1991). They are often critical elements in the analyses leading to decisions of whether or not to build a new school, fire station, library, hospital, a shopping mall, or highway (Siegel 2002). Thus, population estimates make an important contribution to the activities of governments, organizations, and businesses in non-census years. Intercensal estimates provide data for years between two existing censuses, such as 1990 and 2000, while postcensal estimates provide data for years since the last census (Rowland 2003).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bolton, N. (1997). The Use of Intercensal Population Estimates and Projections in the CourtMandated Reapportionment of Los Angeles County, pp. 55-69 in Demographics: A Casebook for Business and Government, H.J. Kinter, T.W. Merrick, P.A. Morrison, and P.R. Voss (Eds.). Rand Publication.
Guseman, P.K. and S.H. Murdock (1983). Techniques for Estimating Local and State Populations: A Guidebook. Austin, TX: Office of the Governor.
Murdock, S.H. and D. Ellis (1991). Applied Demography: An Introduction to Basic Concepts, Methods, and Data. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Murdock, S.H. and M.N. Hoque (1992). Evaluation of Texas Population Estimates and Projections Program’s Population Estimates and Projections for 1990. Departmental Miscellaneous Report No. 92-1. Department of Rural Sociology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas.
Murdock, S.H. and M.N. Hoque (1995). The Effect of Undercount on the Accuracy of SmallArea Population Estimates: Implications for the Use of Administrative Data for Improving Population Enumeration. Population Research and Policy Review 14(2): 251-271.
Murdock, S.H., C. Kelley, J. Jordan, B. Pecotte, and Alvin Luedke (2006). Demographics: A Guide to Methods and Data Sources for Media, Business, and Government. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
Raymondo, J.C. (1992). Population Estimation and Projection: Methods for Marketing, Demographic, and Planning Personnel. New York: Quorum Books.
Rowland, D.T. (2003). Demographic Methods and Concepts. New York: Oxford University Press.
Serow, W.J. W. Terrie, B. Waller, and R.W. Wichmann (1997). The Use of Intercensal Population Estimates in Political Redistricting, pp. 33-54 in Demographics: A Casebook for Business and Government, H.J. Kinter, T.W. Merrick, P.A. Morrison, and P.R. Voss (Eds.). Rand Publication.
Shryock, H. and J. Siegel (1980). The Methods and Materials of Demography. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
Siegel, J.S. (2002). Applied Demography: Applications to Business, Government, Law and Public Policy. San Diego: Academic Press.
Smith, S.K. and S. Cody (2004). An Evaluation of Population Estimates in Florida: April 1, 2000. Population Research and Policy Review 23: 1-24.
Smith, S.K. and B. Lewis (1980). Some New Techniques for Applying the Housing Unit Method of Local Population Estimation. Demography 17: 323-339.
Smith, S.K., J. Tayman, and D. Swanson (2001). State and Local Population Projections: Methodology and Analysis. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
U.S. Census Bureau (2001). Methodology for Estimates of State and County Total Population. Available online at http://www.census.gov/popest/topics/methodology/state.php.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hoque, N. (2008). An Evaluation of Population Estimates for Counties and Places in Texas for 2000. In: Murdock, S.H., Swanson, D.A. (eds) Applied Demography in the 21st Century. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8329-7_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8329-7_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8328-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8329-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)