Skip to main content
Log in

Antibiotic susceptibility testing ofCandida albicans by flow cytometry

  • Published:
Current Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A flow cytofluorometric susceptibility test (FCST) for in vitro antifungal drug testing ofCandida albicans was developed. Membrane damage was indicated by increased cellular fluorescence owing to propidium iodide or rose bengal uptake. Ketoconazole caused an exponential dose-response effect, best defined by Emax, at therapeutically achievable concentrations (0.02–0.2 µg/ml). This effect was not comparable to the conventional minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) effect elicited by higher antibiotic concentrations. Amphotericin B, on the other hand, did not elicit Emax, but caused a >1 log dose-response effect which did correspond to the MIC. 5-Fluorocytosine susceptibility was also measurable. Other cytometric data indicating abnormal growth and growth inhibition, as well as conventional growth inhibition testing, confirmed that the 10-h FCST measured useful parameters of in vitro susceptibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. Bercovier H, Resnick H, Kornitzer D, Levy L (1987) Rapid method for testing drug-susceptibility ofMycobacteria spp. and gram-positive bacteria using rhodamine 123 and fluorescein diacetate. J Microbiol Methods 7:139–142

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bjerknes R, Bassøe C, Sjursen H, Laerum OD, Solberg CO (1989) Flow cytometry for the study of phagocyte functions. Rev Infect Dis 11:16–33

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bossche HV, Willemsens G, Marichal P (1987) Anti-Candida drugs—the biochemical basis for their activity. CRC Crit Rev Microbiol 15:57–72

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boye E, Steen HB, Skarstad K (1983) Flow cytometry of bacteria: a promising tool in experimental and clinical microbiology. J Gen Microbiol 129:973–980

    Google Scholar 

  5. Drutz DJ (1987)In vitro antifungal susceptibility and measurement of levels of antifungal agents in body fluids. Rev Infect Dis 9:392–397

    Google Scholar 

  6. Espinel-Ingroff A, Shadomy S (1989)In vitro andin vivo evaluation of antifungal agents. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 8:352–361

    Google Scholar 

  7. Galgiani JN (1987) Antifungal susceptibility tests. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 31:1867–1890

    Google Scholar 

  8. Galgiani JN, Reiser J, Brass C, Espinel-Ingroff, Gordon MA, Kerkering TM (1987) Comparison of relative susceptibilities ofCandida species to three antifungal agents as determined by unstandardized methods. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 31:1343–1347

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kobayashi GS, Spitzer ED (1989) Testing of organisms for susceptibility to trizoles: is it justified. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 8:387–389

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shapiro HM (1988) Practical flow cytometry, 2nd edn. New York, Alan R Liss

    Google Scholar 

  11. Steen HB, Skarstad K, Boye E (1986) Flow cytometry of bacteria: cell cycle kinetics and effects of antibiotics. In: Andreeff M (ed) Clinical cytometry. Annal NY Acad Sci 468:329–338

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stevens DA (1987) Problems in antifungal chemotherapy. Infection 15:87–92

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tallarida RJ, Murray RB (1981) Manual of pharmacologic calculations with computer programs, 2nd edn. New York: Springer-Verlag

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pore, R.S. Antibiotic susceptibility testing ofCandida albicans by flow cytometry. Current Microbiology 20, 323–328 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02091913

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02091913

Keywords

Navigation