Skip to main content

Everyday Family Food Practices

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Book cover Families, Intergenerationality, and Peer Group Relations

Part of the book series: Geographies of Children and Young People ((GCYP,volume 5))

Abstract

This chapter considers the debates around childhood obesity and focuses on UK public health campaigns, such as Change4Life, aimed at children and their parents. It aims to broaden the childhood obesity debate commonly discussed in the UK public health literature by using childhood studies to critique everyday assumptions that seem to be made about children in public health policy. The chapter considers views and perspectives of children, thereby challenging assumptions that children are “passive vessels” to be filled, suggesting instead that children play an active part in everyday family feeding practices. The family as a context for the negotiation of everyday food practices is explored and the dichotomous relationship of parent and child considered. Reflections are also offered on the fluidity and complexity of family structures and the importance that food plays within the context of everyday family life and how food provisioning impacts on intergenerational relationships within the family. The chapter finishes by exploring perceptions of “proper” or “real” food and its perceived importance for children. While the health literature assumes that children are simply recipients of parental feeding, this chapter highlights research that shows that children also construct their own understandings about the healthiness of food and that they are active participants in negotiating family food practices. Through exploring studies situated within contemporary childhood and families research, the chapter affords a much more nuanced picture of everyday family food practices and children’s roles in those practices than is often presented in childhood obesity discourses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alanen, L. (2001). Explorations in generational analysis. In L. Alanen & B. Mayall (Eds.), Conceptualizing child-adult relations (pp. 11–22). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Attree, P. (2006). A critical analysis of UK public health policies in relation to diet and nutrition in low-income households. Maternal and Child Nutrition, 2(2), 67–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Backett-Milburn, K., Wills, W., Roberts, M.-L., & Lawton, J. (2011). Food and family practices: Teenagers, eating and domestic life in differing socio-economic circumstances. In S. Punch, I. McIntosh, & R. Emond (Eds.), Children’s food practices in families and institutions (pp. 77–88). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2002). Individualization. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brannen, J., Heptinstall, E., & Bhopal, K. (2000). Connecting children: Care and family life in later childhood. London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham, D. (2000). After the death of childhood: Growing up in the age of electronic media. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinthapalli, K. (2012). A third of children finishing primary school in England are overweight or obese. British Medical Journal, 345, e8488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, P. (2004). The health-promoting family: A conceptual framework for future research. Social Science and Medicine, 59(2), 377–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles, N., & Kerr, M. (1988). Women, Food and Families, Manchester, Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colls, R., & Evans, B. (2010). Fat families, fat spaces? A critical interrogation of the Change4Life campaign. In Intergenerational and familial influences on obesity and related conditions: The Biosocial Society and Society for the Study of Human Biology Joint Symposium. Conference held at the University of Durham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corsaro, W. A. (2003). “We’re friends, right?”: Inside kids’ cultures. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, P., James, K., & Ellis, K. (2009). She’s got a really good attitude to healthy food… Nannan’s drilled it into her’ – Intergenerational Relations within Families in ‘Making Healthy Families?’. In P. Jackson (Ed.), Changing families, changing food. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, P., James, A., Ellis, K. (2010). Children’s snacking, children’s food: Food moralities and family life. Children’s Geographies, 8(3), 291–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, P., Stapleton, H., & James, A. (2011a). Intergenerational relations and the family food environment in families with a child with obesity. Annals of Human Biology, 38(4), 429–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, P., James, A., & Ellis, K. (2011b). Children’s snacking, children’s food: Food moralities and family life. In S. Punch, I. McIntosh, & R. Emond (Eds.), Children’s food practices in families and institutions (pp. 65–76). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVault, M. (1991). Feeding the family: The social organisation of caring as gendered work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DH. (2008a). Change4Life: Principles and guidelines for government and the NHS. C4L007. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • DH. (2008b). Change4Life: Time for change. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • DH. (2008c). Healthy weight, healthy lives: A cross-government strategy for England. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • DH. (2009). Change4Life marketing strategy. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • DH and DCSF. (2008). Healthy weight, healthy lives: Consumer insight summary. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • DH and DCSF. (2010). Change4Life one year on: In support of healthy weight, healthy lives. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • DIUS. (2005). Trends and drivers of obesity: A literature review for the foresight project on obesity. Discussant document tackling obesities; future choices. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, B. (1994). Diet, choice and poverty: Social, cultural and nutritional aspects of food consumption among low income families. London: Family Policies Study Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorrer, N., McIntosh, I., Punch, S., & Emond, R. (2011). Children and food practices in residential care: Ambivalence in the ‘institutional’ home. In S. Punch, I. McIntosh, & R. Emond (Eds.), Children’s food practices in families and institutions (pp. 21–34) London, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emond, R., McIntosh, I., & Punch, S. (2014). Food and feelings in residential care. British Journal of Social Work, 44(7), 1840–1856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairbrother, H. (2013). Food and health in everyday life: A qualitative study with children from contrasting backgrounds. Thesis, University of Sheffield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairbrother, H., Curtis, P., & Goyder, E. (2012). Children’s understanding of family financial resources and their impact on eating healthily. Health and Social Care in the Community, 20(5), 528–536. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2524.2012.01070.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finch, J. (2007). Displaying families. Sociology, 41(1), 65–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartas, D. (2008). The right to childhoods: Critical perspectives on rights, difference and knowledge in a transient world. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, M. Y., Moore, L. L., Sundarajan-Ramamurti, A., Singer, M., Cupples, L. A., & Ellison, R. C. (2000). Parental eating attitudes and the development of obesity in children: The Framingham Children’s study. International Journal of Obesity, 24(10), 1319–1325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hursti, K. (1999). Factors influencing children’s food choice, annals of medicine, 31, 26–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, P. (Ed.). (2009). Changing families, changing food. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, A., & Curtis, P. (2010). Family displays and personal lives. Sociology, 44, 1163–1180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, A., & Prout, A. (Eds.). (1997). Constructing and reconstructing childhood: Contemporary issues in the sociological study of childhood. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, A., Curtis, P., & Ellis, K. (2009). Negotiating family, negotiating food: Children as family participants. In A. James et al. (Eds.), Children, food and identity in everyday life (pp. 35–41). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, A., O’Connell, R., & Brannen, J. (2015). The temporality of food practices: Intergenerational relations, childhood memories and mothers’ food practices in working families with young children. Families, Relationships and Societies, 3(2), 303–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambie-Mumford, H., Crossley, D., Jensen, E., Verbeke, M., & Dowler, E. (2014). Household Food Security in the UK: A review of food aid, Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) [SEG 1205]. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/food-aid-research-report

  • Martens, L., Southerton, D., & Scott, S. (2004). Bringing children (and parents) into the sociology of consumption: Towards a theoretical and empirical Agenda. Journal of Consumer Culture, 4(2), 155–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J., & Tipper, B. (2008). Being related: How children define and create kinship. Childhood, 15, 441–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, S. H. (2007). A window on the ‘new’ sociology of childhood. Sociology Compass, 1(1), 322–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayall, B. (1998). Towards a sociology of child health. Sociology of Health and Illness, 20(3), 269–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. (1996). Family connections: An introduction to family studies. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. (2011). Rethinking family practices. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, V. (1998). Understanding families: Children’s perspectives. London: National Children’s Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murcott, A. (1983). ‘It’s a pleasure to cook for him’: Food, mealtimes and gender in some South Wales households. In E. Gamarnikow, D. Morgan, J. Purvis, & D. Taylorson (Eds.), The public and the private (pp. 78–90). London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, M., Alldred, D., & Jones, D. (1996). Children’s constructions of family and kinship. In J. Brannen & M. O’Brien (Eds.), Children in families: Research and policy (pp. 84–100). London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1956). The American family: Its relations to personality and the social structure. In T. Parsons & R. Bales (Eds.), Family socialisation and interaction processes (pp. 3–33). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1955). The child’s construction of reality. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Punch, S., & McIntosh, I. (2014). ‘Food is a funny thing within residential child care’: Intergenerational relationships and food practices in residential care. Childhood, 21(1), 72–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Punch, S., McIntosh, I., & Emond, R. (2011). Children’s food practices in families and institutions. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigg, A., & Pryor, J. (2007). Children’s perceptions of families: What do they really think? Children and Society, 21, 17–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva, E., & Smart, C. (1999). The new family? London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, C., Neale, B., & Wade, A. (2001). The changing experience of childhood: Families and divorce. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, K., Treasure, E., Gill, P., & Chadwick, B. (2006). Understandings about food among 6–11 year olds in South Wales. Food, Culture and Society, 9, 317–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tisdall, E., & Punch, S. (2012). Not so ‘new’? Looking critically at childhood studies. Children’s Geographies, 10(3), 249–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Horst, K., Oenema, A., Ferreira, I., Wendel-Vos, W., Giskes, K., van Lenthe, F., & Brug, J. (2007). A systematic review of environmental correlates of obesity-related dietary behaviours in youth. Health Education Research, 22(2), 203–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warde, A. (2005). Consumption and theories of practice. Journal of Consumer Culture, 5, 131–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, E., Parry, O., Lynch, R., & Murphy, S. (2008). ‘If I don’t like it then I can choose what I want’: Welsh school children’s accounts of preference for and control over food choice. Health Promotion International, 23(2), 144–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, F. (2004). Rethinking families. London: Calouste Gulbenkin Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organisation (WHO). (2012). Population-based approaches to childhood obesity prevention. Geneva: WHO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeiher, H. (2001). Dependent, independent and interdependent relations: Children as members of family households in West Berlin. In L. Alanen & B. Mayall (Eds.), Conceptualising child-adult relations (pp. 37–53). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Fairbrother .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this entry

Cite this entry

Fairbrother, H., Ellis, K. (2016). Everyday Family Food Practices. In: Punch, S., Vanderbeck, R., Skelton, T. (eds) Families, Intergenerationality, and Peer Group Relations. Geographies of Children and Young People, vol 5. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4585-92-7_26-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4585-92-7_26-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-4585-92-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics