Definition
Social class background – social class is best understood through a Marxist orientation as the groupings people fall into as a result of explicit economic forces within society. These groupings are a direct result of similarities with and differences between people, particularly through the resources to which they have access, but also to their tastes and dispositions, which ultimately position them within educational systems.
Characteristics
Usually an encyclopedia entry will begin with some definitions. With both “equity” and “access,” that’s not possible. Each of these terms is politically loaded and reflects political and ideological dispositions both in the pedagogical arena of the classroom and in the intellectual arena of the academy. One problem of defining equity is due to it being assumed to be a universal good; surely everyone wants equity? Actually that’s far from the case, and at least there will be little agreement on how we define and more importantly...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Apple M (1995) Taking power seriously: new directions in equity in mathematics education and beyond. In: Secada W, Fennema E, Adajian L (eds) New directions in equity in mathematics education. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 329–348
Bourdieu P (1998) Practical reason. Polity Press, Cambridge
Burton L (ed) (1990) Gender and mathematics. An international perspective. Cassell, London
Cahan S, Linchevski L, Ygra N, Danziger L (1996) The cumulative effect of ability grouping on mathematical achievement: a longitudinal perspective. Stud Educ Eval 22(1):29–40
Ernest P (2007) Why social justice? Philos Math Educ J 21:2 http://people.exeter.ac.uk/PErnest/pome21/index.htm
Gates P (2006) The place of equity and social justice in the history of PME. In: Guitierrez A, Boero P (eds) Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education. Past, present and future. Sense, Rotterdam, pp 367–402
Gates P, Jorgensen R (2009) Foregrounding social justice in mathematics teacher education. J Math Teach Educ 12(3):161–170
Herman B, Kidron Y, Riccards JB (2010) Gender equity in mathematics education. Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Secretariat, Singapore
Jorgensen R, Gates P, Roper V (2013) Structural exclusion through school mathematics: using Bourdieu to understand mathematics a social practice. Educ Stud Math. doi:10.1007/s10649-013-9468-4. Published online 07 Feb 2013
Lerman S (2000) The social turn in mathematics education research. In: Boaler J (ed) Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning. Ablex, Westport, pp 19–44
Lubienski S (2000a) Problem solving as a means towards mathematics for all: an exploratory look through a class lens. J Res Math Educ 31(4):454–482
Lubienski S (2000b) A clash of cultures? Students’ experiences in a discussion-intensive seventh grade mathematics classroom. Elem Sch J 100:377–403
Lubienski S (2007) Research, reform and equity in US mathematics education. In: Nasir N, Cobb P (eds) Improving access to education. Diversity and equity in the classroom. Teachers College Press, New York, pp 10–23
Pellino K (2007) The effects of poverty on teaching and learning. http://www.teach-nology.com/tutorials/teaching/poverty/print.htm. Accessed 4 Sept 2013
Secada W (1989) Agenda setting, enlightened self-interest and equity in mathematics education. Peabody J Educ 66(1):22–56
Skovsmose O (2011) An invitation to critical mathematics education. Sense, Rotterdam
Zevenbergen R (2000) “Cracking the code” of mathematics classrooms: school success as a function of linguistic, social and cultural background. In: Boaler J (ed) Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning. Ablex, Westport, pp 201–223
Zevenbergen R (2003) Ability grouping in mathematics classrooms: a Bourdieuian analysis. Learn Math 23(3):5–10
Zohar A (1999) Teachers’ metacognitive knowledge and the instruction of higher order thinking. Teach Teach Educ 15(4):413–429
Zohar A, Dori Y (2003) Higher order thinking skills and low-achieving students: are they mutually exclusive? J Learn Sci 12(2):145–181
Zohar A, Degani A, Vaaknin E (2001) Teachers’ beliefs about low-achieving students and higher order thinking. Teach Teach Educ 17:469–485
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this entry
Cite this entry
Gates, P. (2014). Equity and Access in Mathematics Education. In: Lerman, S. (eds) Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4978-8_58
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4978-8_58
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-4977-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-4978-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law