Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Handbook of Neuroethics pp 535–550Cite as

Historical and Ethical Perspectives of Modern Neuroimaging

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:

Abstract

Both in its development and in the definition of its tasks, neuroethics has been intimately connected to neuroimaging, especially to the widespread application of functional brain imaging technologies such as positron emission tomography (PET) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Neuroimaging itself, in particular its uses, interpretation, communication, media presence, and public understanding, has been one of neuroethics’ primordial subjects. Moreover, key neuroethical issues, such as brain privacy or the conceptualization of blame, responsibility, and in general human personhood, have largely gained from neuroimaging the form under which neuroethics deals with them. The use of neuroimaging techniques to investigate phenomena usually associated with research in the humanities and human sciences brought those phenomena into the orbit of neurobiological explanation. Neuroethics emerged in the context of such technology-driven intellectual and professional developments. Thus, more than an important stimulus for the development of neuroethics or a particular source of neuroethical challenges, the spread of functional neuroimaging can be considered as a condition of possibility of the field. In return, neuroethics supports the claim that the neurosciences, in particular by way of functional neuroimaging, will revolutionize “traditional” ways of understanding the human. To the extent that such a claim is debatable, neuroethics might benefit from examining its special relationship to neuroimaging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   999.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aggarwal, N. K. (2009). Neuroimaging, culture, and forensic psychiatry. Journal of the American Academy of Psychitry and Law, 37, 239–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbara, J. G. (2008). Diversité et évolution des pratiques chirurgicales, anatomiques et physiologiques du cerveau au XVIIIe siècle. In C. Chérici & J.-C. Dupont (Eds.), Les querelles du cerveau. Comment furent inventées les neurosciences (pp. 19-54). Paris: Vuibert.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bizzi, E., et al. (2009). Using imaging to identify deceit: Scientific and ethical questions. Cambridge, MA: American Academy of Arts and Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borck, C. (2001). Electricity as a medium of psychic life: Electrotechnological adventures into psychodiagnosis in Weimar Germany. Science in Context, 14(4), 565–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borck, C. (2005). Hirnströme: Eine Kulturgeschichte der Elektroenzephalographie. Berlin: Wallstein.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgwardt, S., & Fusar-Poli, P. (2012). Third-generation neuroimaging in early schizophrenia: Translating research evidence into clinical utility. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 200, 270–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broca, P. (1861). Remarks on the seat of the Faculty of Articulated Language, following an observation of aphemia (loss of speech) (trans: Green, C.). http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Broca/aphemie-e.htm. First published in Bulletin de la Société Anatomique, 6, 330–357.

  • Brosnan, C. (2011). The sociology of neuroethics: Expectational discourses and the rise of a new discipline. Sociology Compass, 5/4, 287–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkitt, L. (2009). Neuromarketing: Companies use neuroscience for consumer insights. Forbes, 16 November. http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2009/1116/marketing-hyundai-neurofocus-brain-waves-battle-for-the-brain.html. Last Accessed 8 Dec 2012.

  • Calhoun, V. D., & Hugdahl, K. (2012). Cognition and neuroimaging in schizophrenia. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, Article 276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, A., & Farah, M. J. (Eds.). (2013). Neuroethics in practice: Medicine, mind, and society. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, E., & Dewhurst, K. E. (1996 [1972]). An illustrated history of brain function: Imaging the brain from antiquity to the present (2nd edn, with a new chapter by M. J. Aminoff). San Francisco: Norman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, E. & Jacyna, L. S. (1987). Nineteenth-century origins of neuroscientific concepts. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coltheart, M. (2006). Perhaps functional neuroimaging has not told us anything about the mind (so far). Cortex, 42, 422–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, E. C., & De Vries, R. (2012). Field of dreams: A social history of neuroethics. In M. Pickersgill & I. Van Keulen (Eds.), Sociological reflections on the neurosciences (pp. 299–324). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooter, R. (2010a). Inside the whale: Bioethics in history and discourse. Social History of Medicine, 23, 662–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooter, R. (2010b). Neuroethical brains, historical minds, and epistemic virtues. Unpublished lecture, Wellcome Trust Center for the history of medicine symposium “neuroscience and human nature.” http://www.ucl.ac.uk/histmed/downloads/articles/neuroethical_brains_historical_minds_epistemic_virtues.pdf

  • Cowey, A. (2001). Functional localization in the brain: From ancient to modern. Psychologist, 14, 250–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Detre, J., & Bockow, T. B. (2013). Incidental findings in neuroimaging studies. (In Chatterjee and Farah 2013, pp. 120–127).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumit, J. (2004). Picturing personhood: Brain scans and biomedical identity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farah, M. J. (2005). Neuroethics: The practical and the philosophical. Trends in Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 34–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farah, M. J. (Ed.). (2010a). Neuroethics: An introduction with readings. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farah, M. J. (2010b). Neuroethics: An overview. (In Farah 2010a, pp. 1–9).

    Google Scholar 

  • Farah, M. J., & Gillihan, S. J. (2012). The puzzle of neuroimaging and psychiatric diagnosis: Technology and nosology in an evolving discipline. AJOB Neuroscience, 3(4), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farah, M. J., & Heberlein, A. S. (2007). Personhood and neuroscience: Naturalizing or nihilating? The American Journal of Bioethics, 7(1), 37–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farah, M. J., et al. (2004). Neurocognitive enhancement: What can we do and what should we do? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 421–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feuerhahn, W., & Mandressi, R. (Eds.). (2011). Les sciences de l’homme à l’âge du neurone (special issue of Revue d’histoire des sciences humaines, No. 25).

    Google Scholar 

  • Figlio, K. M. (1975). Theories of perception and the physiology of mind in the late eighteenth century. History of Science, 12, 177–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finger, S. (1994). Origins of neuroscience: A history of explorations into brain function. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flis, N. (2012). Drawing, etching, and experiment in Christopher Wren’s figure of the brain. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 37(2), 145–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, M. (Ed.). (2011). Law and neuroscience. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giordano, J., & Gordijn, B. (Eds.). (2010). Scientific and ethical philosophical perspectives in neuroethics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glannon, W. (Ed.). (2007). Defining right and wrong in brain science: Essential readings in neuroethics. Washington, DC: The Dana Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glannon, W. (2008). Psychopharmacological enhancement. Neuroethics, 1, 45–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagner, M. (2004). Geniale Gehirne. Zur Geschichte der Elitenhirnforschung. Berlin:Wallstein.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagner, M. (2009 [2006]). The mind at work: The visual representation of cerebral processes (Trad. U. Froese.). In R. van de Vall & R. Zwijnenberg (Eds.), Body within: Art, medicine and visualization (pp. 67–90). Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagner, M., & Borck, C. (2001). Mindful practices: On the neurosciences in the twentieth century. Science in Context, 14(4), 507–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardcastle, V. G., & Stewart, M. C. (2002). What do brain data really show? Philosophy of Science, 69, S72–S82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, E. R. (1975). The inward wits: Psychological theory in the middle ages and the renaissance. London: Warburg Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyer, A. (2010). Neurotechnologie, philosophie und hirnforschung. Zur Entstehung und Institutionalisierung der Neuroethik. M. A. thesis in philosophy, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt am Main.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illes, J. (2003). Neuroethics in a new era of neuroimaging. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 24, 1739–1741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illes, J. (Ed.). (2006). Neuroethics: Defining the issues in theory, practice, and policy. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illes, J., & Sahakian, B. (Eds.). (2011). Oxford handbook of neuroethics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illes, J., Kirschen, M., & Gabrieli, J. (2003). From neuroimaging to neuroethics. Nature Neuroscience, 6(3), 205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Illes, J., & Racine, E. (2005). Imaging or imagining? A neuroethics challenge informed by genetics. American Journal of Bioethics, 5(2), 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Illes, J., Racine, E., & Kirschen, M. P. (2006). A picture is worth a thousand word, but which one thousand? (In Illes 2006, pp. 149–168).

    Google Scholar 

  • Insel, T. (2010). Rethinking schizophrenia. Nature, 468, 187–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John, S. (2004). Titanic ethics, pirate ethics, bioethics. Studies in History and Philosophy of the Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 35, 177–184. (Essay review of Frankel Paul, E., Miller, F. D. Jr., & Paul J. (Eds.), Bioethics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, K. A. (2008). Magnetic appeal: MRI and the myth of transparency. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, S. (1990). Medieval psychology. New York: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempton, M., et al. (2008). Meta-analysis, database, and meta-regression of 98 structural imaging studies in bipolar disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry, 65(9), 1017–1032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendler, K. S., & First, M. B. (2010). Alternative futures for the DSM revision process: Iteration v. paradigm shift. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 197, 263–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koolschijn, C., et al. (2009). Brain volume abnormalities in major depressive disorder: A meta-analysis of magnetic resonance imaging studies. Human Brain Mapping, 30(11), 3719–3735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosslyn, S. M. (1999). If neuroimaging is the answer, what is the question? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 354, 1283–1294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulynych, J. (2002). Legal and ethical issues in neuroimaging research: Human subjects protection, medical privacy, and the public communication of research result. Brain and Cognition, 50, 345–357. (Also in Glannon 2007, pp. 115–133).

    Google Scholar 

  • Larink, W. (2011). Bilder vom Gehirn. Bildwissenschaftliche Zugänge zum Gehirn als Seelenorgan. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, N. (2008). Introducting neuroethics. Neuroethics, 1, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littlefield, M. M., & Johnson, J. M. (Eds.). (2012). The neuroscientific turn: Transdisciplinarity in the age of the brain. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malhi, G. S., & Lagopoulos, J. (2008). Making sense of neuroimaging in psychiatry. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 117, 100–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandressi, R. (2011). Le cerveau et ses représentations dans la première modernité (XVIe– XVIIe siècles). Médecine/Sciences, 27, 89–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molnár, Z. (2004). Thomas Willis, the founder of clinical neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5(4), 329–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, Z., et al. (2009). Incidental findings on brain magnetic resonance imaging: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ, 339, b3016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, C., & Joffe, H. (2013). How has neuroscience affected lay understanding of personhood? A review of the evidence. Public Understanding of Science, 22, 254–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortega, F. (2011). Toward a genealogy of neuroascesis. In F. Ortega & F. Vidal (Eds.), Neurocultures: Glimpses into an expanding universe (pp. 27–44). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penfield, W., & Boldrey, E. (1937). Somatic motor and sensory representation in the cerebral cortex of man studied by electrical stimulation. Brain, 60, 389–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penfield, W., & Rasmussen, T. (1950). The cerebral cortex of man: A clinical study of localization of function. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pogliano, C. (2012). Penfield’s homunculus and other grotesque creatures from the Land of If. Nuncius, 27, 141–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poldrack, R. A. (2010). Mapping mental function to brain structure: How can cognitive neuroimaging succeed? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(6), 753–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Racine, E., Bar-Ilan, O., & Illes, J. (2005). fMRI in the public eye. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6(2), 159–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Racine, E., Bell, E., & Illes, J. (2010a). Can we read minds: Ethical challenges and responsibilities in the use of neuroimaging research. (In Giordano and Gordijn 2010, pp. 244–270).

    Google Scholar 

  • Racine, E., Waldman, S., Rosenberg, J., & Illes, J. (2010b). Contemporary neuroscience in the media. Social Science & Medicine, 71, 725–733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rafter, N. (2008). The criminal brain: Understanding biological theories of crime. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Repantis, D., Schlattmann, P., Laisney, O., & Heuser, I. (2010). Modafinil and methylphenidate for neuroenhancement in healthy individuals: A systematic review. Pharmacological Research, 62, 187–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renneville, M. (2000). Le langage des crânes. Une histoire de la phrénologie. Paris: Les Empêcheurs de tourner en rond.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roskies, A. (2002). Neuroethics for the new millenium. Neuron, 35, 21–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roskies, A. L. (2007). Are neuroimages like photographs of the brain? Philosophy of Science, 74, 860–872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roskies, A. L. (2009). Brain-mind and structure-function relationships: A methodological response to coltheart. Philosophy of Science, 76, 927–939.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roskies, A. L. (2010). Saving subtraction: A reply to Van Orden and Paap. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 61, 635–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, G. (2007). “Brainomania”: Brain, mind and soul in the long eighteenth century. British Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies, 30, 161–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schick, A. (2005). Neuro exceptionalism? The American Journal of Bioethics, 5(2), 36–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schleim, S., & Roiser, J. P. (2009). fMRI in translation: The challenges facing real-world applications. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 3, Article 63, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorvon, W. D. (2009). A history of neuroimaging in epilepsy 1909–2009. Epilepsia, 50(Suppl), 39–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, J. R. (2012a). Introduction. (In Simpson 2012a, pp. xv–xvii).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, J. R. (Ed.). (2012b). Neuroimaging in forensic psychiatry: From the clinic to the courtroom. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, I., & Rose, N. (2006). Neuro-forum: An introduction. BioSocieties, 1, 97–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spranger, T. M. (Ed.). (2012). International neurolaw: A comparative analysis. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, S. L. (1989). Regions of the mind: Brain research and the quest for scientific certainty. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Temkin, O. (1973). Galenism: Rise and decline of a medical philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tovino, S. (2007a). Functional neuroimaging information: A case for neuro exceptionalism? Florida State University Law Review, 34, 414–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tovino, S. (2007b). Imaging body structure and mapping brain function: A historical approach. American Journal of Law & Medicine, 333, 193–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uttal, W. R. (2001). The new phrenology: The limits of localizing cognitive processes in the brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Orden, G. C., & Paap, K. R. (1997). Functional neuroimages fail to discover pieces of the mind in the parts of the brain. Philosophy of Science, 64 (Proceedings), S85–S94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Wyhe, J. (2002). The authority of human nature: the Schädellehre of Franz Joseph Gall. British Journal for the History of Science, 35, 17–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidal, F. (2009). Brainhood, anthropological figure of modernity. History of the Human Sciences, 22, 5–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vidal, F. (2011). The Sciences of the Soul: the Early Modern Origins of Psychology (trans. Brown, S.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidal, F., & Ortega, F. (2011). Are there neural correlates of depression? In S. Choudhury & J. Slaby (Eds.), Critical neuroscience: A handbook of the social and cultural contexts of neuroscience (pp. 345–366). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Willis, T. (1664). The anatomy of the brain and nerves (trans: Pordage, S., London, 1681). Birmingham, AL: The Classics of Neurology & Neurosurgery Library, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, S. M. (2011). Incidental findings in neuroscience research: A fundamental challenge to the structure of bioethics and health law. (In Illes and Sahakian 2011, pp. 623–634).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpe, P. R. (2002). The neuroscience revolution. The Hastings Center Report, 32(4), 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, R. (1990). Mind, brain and adaptation in the nineteenth century: Cerebral localization and its biological context from Gall to Ferrier. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zago, S., Lorusso, L., Ferrucci, R., & Priori, A. (2012). Functional neuroimaging: A historical perspective. In P. Bright (Ed.), Neuroimaging – Methods (InTech), Ch. 1. http://www.intechopen.com/books/neuroimaging-methods/the-origins-of-functional-neuroimaging-techniques

  • Zimmer, C. (2004). Soul made flesh: The English civil war and the mapping of the mind. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ICREA (Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies), CEHIC (Center for the History of Science, Autonoma University of Barcelona), Barcelona, Spain

    Fernando Vidal

  2. Unitat d’Història de la Medicina, Facultat de Medicina, M6/130, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193, Bellaterra (Barcelona), Spain

    Fernando Vidal

Authors
  1. Fernando Vidal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fernando Vidal .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany

    Jens Clausen

  2. The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia

    Neil Levy

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

Vidal, F. (2015). Historical and Ethical Perspectives of Modern Neuroimaging. In: Clausen, J., Levy, N. (eds) Handbook of Neuroethics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4707-4_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4707-4_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-4706-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-4707-4

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation