Skip to main content

Historical principles vs. synchronic approaches

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Book cover International Handbook of Modern Lexis and Lexicography

Abstract

Although there have been numerous studies of both synchronic and historical lexicographical features of dictionaries, few of them have been directly comparative, and this might seem surprising. In this chapter, a number of questions are addressed. What is the context and background for synchronic and historical approaches in dictionaries, and what does it mean to make this distinction in the first place? What are the key distinguishing features of synchronic and historical descriptions, and why do they matter, for the user or for anyone else? Also, what are the individual challenges and issues in the two approaches? As well as an overview of some key moments in the development of the debate, the questions will be approached by means of a case study – of the word “capital” – and analysis of specific lexicographical features. The examples are drawn from English language lexicography and are focused on general dictionaries (as opposed to dictionaries specially designed for children or learners of English), but there is an expectation that many of the observations can be generalized to apply to other languages and lexicographical contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Blackburn, S. (2008). Oxford dictionary of philosophy (2nd rev ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogaards, P. (2003). Uses and users of dictionaries. In P. van Sterkenburg (Ed.), A practical guide to lexicography (pp. 26–33). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, C. (2000). OED sources. In L. Mugglestone (Ed.), Lexicography and the OED. Pioneers in the untrodden forest (pp. 40–58). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinton, L. (forthcoming). Using historical corpora and historical text databases. In P. Durkin (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of lexicography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowie, A. P. (Ed.). (2008). The Oxford history of English lexicography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, M. (2012). The 400 Million word corpus of historical American English (1810–2009). In I. Hegedus et al. (Eds.), English historical linguistics 2010 (pp. 217–250). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkin, P. (Ed.). (forthcoming). The Oxford handbook of lexicography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanks, P. (2008). The lexicographical legacy of John Sinclair. International Journal of Lexicography, 21(3), 219–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawke, A. (forthcoming). Quotation evidence and definitions. In P. Durkin (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of lexicography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lew, R. (2011). Studies in dictionary use: recent developments. International Journal of Lexicography, 24(1), 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowell, J. R. (1860, May). Atlantic Monthly. pp. 631–633.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mugglestone, L. (Ed.). (2000). Lexicography and the OED: pioneers in the untrodden forest. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mugglestone, L. (2005). Lost for words: the hidden history of the Oxford English dictionary. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, J. A. H. (1888). Preface to Volume I of A New English Dictionary on Historical Principles … Volume I. A and B. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. O. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. O. (1970). Philosophy of logic. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 104(3), 192–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheidlower, J. (2011). How quotation paragraphs in historical dictionaries work: the Oxford English dictionary. In M. Adams & A. Curzan (Eds.), Contours of English and English language studies (pp. 191–212). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, J. (2008). Why is the OED so small? In S. Vanvolsem & L. Lepschy (Eds.), Nell’officina del dizionario: Atti del Convegno Internazionale organizzato dall’Istituto di Cultura Lussemburgo (Romanische Sprachen und ihre Didaktik, Vol. 19, pp. 113–129). Stuttgart: ibidem-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, J. (2013). A heads up for the June 2013 OED release. public.oed.com/the-oed-today/recent-updates-to-the-oed/june-2013-update/a-heads-up-for-the-june-2013-oed-release. Accessed Mar 2014.

  • Sinclair, J. (Ed.). (1987). Looking up: an account of the COBUILD project in lexical computing. London: Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, J. (2004). Trust the text: language, corpus and discourse. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speaks, J. (2011). Theories of meaning. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2011/entries/meaning. Accessed Mar 2014.

  • Svensén, B. (2009). A handbook of lexicography: the theory and practice of dictionary-making (J. Sykes, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trench, R. C. (1851). The study of words. New York: W. J. Widdleton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trench, R. C. (1860). On some deficiencies in our English dictionaries. London: John W. Parker & Son, West Strand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (2009). Philosophical investigations. (First published in German as Philosophische Untersuchungen in 1953) (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Dictionaries

  • [CED] Hanks, P., et al. (1st ed. 1979, 9th ed. 2007). Collins English Dictionary. London/Glasgow: Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers Twentieth Century Dictionary of the English Language. (1901). Edinburgh: W. and R. Chambers.

    Google Scholar 

  • [CIDE2 (CALD)] Woodford, K., et al. (2005). Cambridge Advanced Learner’s Dictionary (=2nd edition of CIDE). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • [COBUILD] Sinclair, J. M., Hanks, P., et al. (1987). Collins COBUILD English Language Dictionary. London/Glasgow: Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • [COD] Fowler, H. W., & Fowler, F. G. (Eds.). (1911). The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Current English (1st ed.). Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins Dictionary Online. (2012–). London/Glasgow: HarperCollins. http://www.collinsdictionary.com. Accessed Mar 2014.

  • Diccionario General Vox de la Lengua Español. (2008–). Barcelona: Larousse Editorial. http://www.diccionarios.com. Accessed Mar 2014.

  • Dictionary.com. (n.d.). http://www.dictionary.com. Accessed Mar 2014.

  • [DOST] Craigie, W., Aitken, J., Sevenson, J., & Dareau, M. (Eds.). (1931–2001). Dictionary of the Older Scottish Tongue. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • [F&W] Funk & Wagnall’s Standard Dictionary of the English Language. (1893). New York: Funk and Wagnall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funk & Wagnall’s New College Standard Dictionary. (1947). New York: Funk and Wagnall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, J., & Grimm W., et al. (1854–1960). Deutsches Wörterbuch. Leipzig/Stuttgart: S. Hirzel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary. (1898). Springfield: Merriam-Webster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam-Webster Online. (n.d.). http://www.merriam-webster.com. Accessed Mar 2014.

  • Morris, W., et al. (1969). The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (1st ed.). Boston: American Heritage Publishing Co. and Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • [NOAD] Jewell, E. J., et al. (2001). New Oxford American Dictionary. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • [NODE] Pearsall, J., & Hanks, P. (Eds.). (1998). New Oxford Dictionary of English (1st ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • [ODO] Oxford Dictionaries Online. (2010–). Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://www.oxforddictionaries.com. Accessed Mar 2014.

  • [ODE2] Soanes, C., & Stevenson, A. (2004). Oxford Dictionary of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • [OED] Murray, J. A. H., et al. (1933). The Oxford English Dictionary (1st ed., 12 vols.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • [OED2] Simpson, J., & Weiner, E. S. C. (1989). The Oxford English Dictionary (2nd ed., 20 vols.). Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • [OED3] OED Online. (2000–). Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://www.oed.com. Accessed Mar 2014.

  • Random House Kernerman Webster’s College Dictionary. (2010). Tel Aviv: K Dictionaries. By arrangement with Random House Inc. http://www.thefreedictionary.com. Accessed Mar 2014.

  • TheFreeDictionary.com. (n.d.). Farlex. http://www.thefreedictionary.com. Accessed Mar 2014.

  • Webster, N. et al. (1828). An American Dictionary of the English Language. New York: S. Converse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiktionary. (2002–). http://en.wiktionary.org. Accessed Mar 2014.

Dictionary Prefaces

  • Fowler, H. W., & Fowler, F. G. (1911). Preface. In The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Current English (pp. iii–x). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funk, I. K. (1893). Introductory. In A Standard Dictionary of the English Language (pp. vi–xiv). New York: Funk and Wagnall’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liddell, H. G., & Scott, R. (1843). Preface. In A Greek-English Lexicon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, J. A. H. (1884). General Explanations. In New English Dictionary (Vol. 1, pp. vii–xiv). Oxford: Clarendon. fascicle 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, N. (1872). Preface. In Webster’s Revised Unabridged Dictionary of the English Language (pp. iiv–iv). Springfield: G. and C. Merriam Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urdang, L. (1979). Editorial Preface. In Collins English Dictionary. Glasgow: Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, N. (1828). Preface. An American Dictionary of the English Language.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitney, W. D. (1889). Preface. In The Century Dictionary: An Encyclopedic Lexicon of the English Language (pp. v–xvi). New York: The Century Co.

    Google Scholar 

Other Electronic Resources

  • COHA: the corpus of historical American English: 400 million words, 1810–2009. (2010–). Compiled by Mark Davies (Brigham Young University). Available online at http://corpus.byu.edu/coha/

  • OEC: Oxford English corpus. (2000–). 2.5 billion words and growing at a rate of 120 million words per month. Compiled by Oxford University Press. Available under research licence from OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sketch engine: a corpus query system. (2003–). Compiled by Lexical Computing Ltd. Available online at http://www.sketchengine.co.uk/

Download references

Note

This chapter is written on the basis of the experience of working within the Academic Dictionary Department of Oxford University Press over some years, and is at times informed directly by personal experience and information, for example, the evidence of internal papers and proceedings from the Department.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Judy Pearsall .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this entry

Cite this entry

Pearsall, J. (2015). Historical principles vs. synchronic approaches. In: Hanks, P., de Schryver, GM. (eds) International Handbook of Modern Lexis and Lexicography. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45369-4_3-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45369-4_3-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-45369-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics