Skip to main content

Ecosystem-Based Management: Opportunities and Challenges for Application in the Ocean Forest

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 309 Accesses

Abstract

The policy history of the Ecosystem Approach (EA) is first reviewed, from the perspectives of both intergovernmental agencies involved in resource management and agencies focused on conservation of biodiversity, focusing on how the agencies adapted the EA to the marine environment. This provides the general interpretation of “ecosystem approach,” but at a conceptual level that needs to be substantially operationalized. To approach that operationalization, three case histories of applying the EA in the ocean forests of Australia are summarized. These include a place-based application, a threat-based application, and an attempt at an application simultaneously taking both components into the planning and implementation of an ecosystem approach. Building on those case histories the chapter explores how well the “ocean forest” analogy actually transfers into marine conservation and management. To do so, the chapter reviews the mature ecosystem approach and sustainable use frameworks from terrestrial forestry. The review summarizes the forest synthesis of ecosystem protection and management, and then evaluates the components of the synthesis in terms of applicability to marine rather than terrestrial ecosystems, and the forests of the ocean. The discussion concludes that the forestry operationalization as a useful basis for implementing an ecosystem approach in the ocean forests would require significant adaptations. These would change the focus from direct harvesting of the forest itself to the harvesting of resources found in the ocean forest. Thus, the analogy of an ocean forest may have limitations when viewed in a policy and management context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Achard FHD, Stibig HJ, Mayaux P, Gallego J, Richards T, Malingreau JP. Determination of deforestation rates of the world’s humid tropical forests. Science. 2002;297(5583):999–1003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Astles KL, Holloway MG, Steffe A, Green M, Ganassin C, Gibbs PJ. An ecological method for qualitative risk assessment and its use in the management of fisheries in New South Wales, Australia. Fish Res. 2006;82:290–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruckner, A. W. 2014. Advances in management of precious corals in the family Corallidae: are new measures adequate? Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 7:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • CBD 2000. Twelve Principles for an Ecosystem Approach. Available on-line at https://www.cbd.int/ecosystem/principles.shtml.

  • Convention on Biological Diversity. The ecosystem approach, (CBD guidelines) montreal: secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. 2004. 50 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day JC, Dobbs K. Effective governance of a large and complex cross- jurisdictional marine protected area: Australia’s Great Barrier Reef. Mar Policy. 2013;41:14–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EPBC 1999. Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999. Government of the Commonwealth of Australia. Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehler C, Douvere F. Marine spatial planning: a step-by-step approach toward ecosystem-based management. Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission and Man and the Biosphere Programme. IOC manual and guides no. 53, ICAM dossier no. 6. Paris: UNESCO; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO). Fisheries management. 2. The ecosystem approach to fisheries, FAO technical guidelines for responsible fisheries, vol. 4. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organisation; 2003a. 112 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO. Sustainable forest management and the ecosystem approach: two concepts, one gosl. In Wilkie Ml, Holmgren P, Castaneda F, editors. Forest management working papers. Working paper FM 25. Forst resources development services. Rome: FAO; 2003b. 31 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO. The world’s mangroves 1980–2005. FAO forestry paper no. 153. Rome: Forest Resources Division, FAO; 2005. p. 77.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO. International guidelines for the management of deep-sea fisheries in the high seas. Rome: FAO; 2009. 73 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher WJ. Application of qualitative risk assessment methodology to prioritise issues for fisheries management. ICES J Mar Res. 2005;62:1576–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher WJ, Chesson J, Sainsbury KJ, Fisher M, Hundloe T. A flexible and practical framework for reporting on ecologically sustainable development for wild capture fisheries. Fish Res. 2005;71:175–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher WJ, Shaw J, Metcalf SJ, Gaughan DJ. An ecosystem based fisheries management framework: the efficient, regional-level planning tool for management agencies. Mar Policy. 2010;34:1226–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulton EA, Smith ADM, Smith DC, Johnson P. An integrated approach is needed for ecosystem based fisheries management: insights from ecosystem-level management strategy evaluation. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e84242. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0084242.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hobday AJ, Smith ADM, Stobutzki IC, Bulman C, Daley R, Dambacher JM, Deng RA, Dowdney J, Fuller M, Furlani RA, Griffiths SP, Johnson D, Kenyon R, Knuckey IA, Ling SD, Pitcher R, Sainsbury KJ, Sporcic M, Smith T, Turnbull C, Walker TI, Wayte SE, Webb H, Williams A, Wise BS, Zhou S. Ecological risk assessment for the effects of fishing. Fish Res. 2011;108:372–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marine Stewardship Council 2015. MSC General Certification Requirements, Version 2.1 available online https://www.msc.org/documents/scheme-documents/msc-scheme-requirements/msc-general-certification-requirements-v2.1/at.

  • Pikitch EK, Santora C, Babcock EA, Bakun A, Bonfil R, Conover DO, Dayton P, Doukakis P, Fluharty D, Heneman B, Houde ED, Link J, Livingston PA, Mangel M, McAllister MK, Pope J, Sainsbury KJ. Ecosystem-based fishery management. Science. 2004;305:346–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pitcher R, Doherty P, Arnold P, Hooper J, Gribble N. Seabed biodiversity on the continental shelf of the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area. Final report to the cooperative research centre for the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area. Brisbane; 2007. 315 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitcher T, Kalikoski D, Pramod G, Short K. Not honouring the code. Nature. 2009;457:658–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Polidoro BA, Carpenter KE, Collins L, Duke NC, Ellison AM, Ellison JC, Farnsworth EJ, Fernando ES, Kathiresan K, Koedam NE, Livingstone SR, Miyagi T, Moore GE, Nam VN, Ong JE, Primavera JH, Salmo SG, Sanciangco JC, Sukardjo S, Wang Y, Yong JWH. The loss of species: mangrove extinction risk and geographic areas of global concern. PLoS One. 2010;5:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice JC. Managing fisheries well: delivering the promise of an Ecosystem Approach. Fish Fish. 2011;12:209–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld JS. Functional redundancy in ecology and conservation. Oikos. 2002;98:156–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sainsbury KJ, Punt AE, Smith ADM. Design of operational management strategies for achieving fishery ecosystem objectives. ICES J Mar Sci. 2000;57:731–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sainsbury K, Gullestad P, Rice J. The use of national frameworks for sustainable development of marine fisheries and conservation, ecosystem-based management and integrated ocean management. In: Garcia SM, Rice J, Charles A, editors. Governance of marine fisheries and biodiversity conservation: interaction and co-evolution. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schindler DE, Hilborn R, Chasco B, Boatright CP, Quinn TP, Rogers LA, Webster MS. Population diversity and the portfolio effect in an exploited species. Nature. 2010;465:609–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith ADM, Fulton EJ, Hobday AJ, Smith DC, Shoulder P. Scientific tools to support practical implementation of ecosystem based fisheries management. ICES J Mar Sci. 2007;64:633–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stobutzki I, Miller M, Brewer D. Sustainability of fishery bycatch: a process for assessing highly diverse and numerous bycatch. Environ Conserv. 2001;28:167–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsamenyi M, Kenchington RA. Australian oceans policymaking. Coast Manag. 2012;40(2):119–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNEP/CBD. Report of the workshop on the ecosystem approach. Lilongwe; 1998. 1998 Jan 26–28. UNEP/CBD/COP/4. Inf.9: 15 p + Annex.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. Report of the United Nations conference on environment and development: Agenda 21. 1992. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf

  • Vince J. Managing Australia’s Oceans through the oceans policy process. In: Gullet W, Schofield C, Vince J, editors. Marine resources management. Sydney: Lexis Nexis Butterworths; 2011. p. 77–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vince J, Smith ADM, Sainsbury KJ, Cresswell ID, Smith DC, Haward M. Australia’s Oceans policy: past, present and future. Mar Policy. 2015;57:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Washington S, Ababouch L. Private standards and certification in fisheries and aquaculture: current practice and emerging issues. FAO fisheries and aquaculture technical paper 553. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams A, Dowdney J, Smith ADM, Hobday AJ, Fuller M. Evaluating impacts of fishing on benthic habitats: a risk assessment framework applied to Australian fisheries. Fish Res. 2011;112:154–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou S, Griffiths SP. Sustainability assessment for fishing effects (SAFE): a new quantitative ecological risk assessment method and its application to elasmobranch bycatch in an Australian trawl fishery. Fish Res. 2008;91:56–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jake Rice .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this entry

Cite this entry

Rice, J., Smith, A.D.M. (2015). Ecosystem-Based Management: Opportunities and Challenges for Application in the Ocean Forest. In: Rossi, S., Bramanti, L., Gori, A., Orejas Saco del Valle, C. (eds) Marine Animal Forests. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17001-5_26-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17001-5_26-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17001-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Biomedicine and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics