Skip to main content

Organ Allocation for Children

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Organ and Tissue Transplantation ((OTT))

Abstract

In 1984, the US government passed the National Organ Transplant Act (NOTA), which mandated governmental oversight of solid organ transplantation and allocation. The scarcity of organs coupled with high mortality rates awaiting transplantation in all age groups required added pressure for the codified protection and prioritization of children, who have been designated a special and vulnerable population. Allocation systems have been implemented across different organs with varying success in advocating for children declining on the waitlist. Ethical principles supporting pediatric prioritization across organs and the success of international allocation systems that provide further priority continue to give hope for improvements in pediatric waitlist mortality and morbidity.

Hong BJ and Smith JM Shared First authorship

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Alexander S (1962) They decide who lives, who dies. Life 102–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Almaas R, Jensen U, Loennecken MC et al (2015) Impaired motor competence in children with transplanted liver. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 60:723–728. doi:10.1097/MPG.0000000000000757

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Almond CSD, Thiagarajan RR, Piercey GE et al (2009) Waiting list mortality among children listed for heart transplantation in the United States. Circulation 119:717–727. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.815712

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Barnieh L, Gill JS, Klarenbach S, Manns BJ (2013) The cost-effectiveness of using payment to increase living donor kidneys for transplantation. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 8:2165–2173. doi:10.2215/CJN.03350313

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Benden C, Inci I, Weder W, Boehler A (2010) Size-reduced lung transplantation in children – an option worth to consider! Pediatr Transplant 14:529–533. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3046.2009.01267.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Committee OE (2015) Ethical principles in the allocation of human organs. In: http://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/converge/resources/allocationcalculators.asp?index=81. http://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/resources/ethics/ethical-principles-in-the-allocation-of-human-organs/. Accessed 4 Jun 2015

  • Committee OPT, Committee OE (2014) Ethical principles of pediatric organ allocation. In: http://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/converge/resources/allocationcalculators.asp?index=81. http://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/resources/ethics/ethical-principles-of-pediatric-organ-allocation/. Accessed 4 Jun 2015

  • Daniels N (2007) Just health. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • de Sante J, Caplan A, Hippen B et al (2014) Was Sarah Murnaghan treated justly? Pediatrics 134:155–162. doi:10.1542/peds.2013-4189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emanuel EJ (2004) Ending concerns about undue inducement. J Law Med Ethics 32:100–105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eurotransplant Manual. In: https://www.eurotransplant.org/cms/index.php?page=et_manual. Accessed 12 Nov 2015

  • Goldfarb SB, Benden C, Edwards LB et al (2015) The registry of the international society for heart and lung transplantation: eighteenth official pediatric lung and heart-lung transplantation report – 2015. J Heart Lung Transplant 34(10):1255–1263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodnough A (2013) Vote allows children under 12 seeking lung transplant to have case reviewed. The New York Times A11

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon EJ, Patel CH, Sohn M-W et al (2015) Does financial compensation for living kidney donation change willingness to donate? Am J Transplant 15:265–273. doi:10.1111/ajt.13004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herden U, Grabhorn E, Briem-Richter A et al (2014) Developments in paediatric liver transplantation since implementation of the new allocation rules in Eurotransplant. Clin Transplant. doi:10.1111/ctr.12420, n/a–n/a

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Horslen S (2004) Organ allocation for liver-intestine candidates. Liver Transpl 10:S86–S89. doi:10.1002/lt.20257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu EK, Shaffer M, Bradford M et al (2015) Heterogeneity and disparities in the use of exception scores in pediatric liver allocation. Am J Transplant 15:436–444. doi:10.1111/ajt.13089

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Israni AK, Salkowski N, Gustafson S et al (2014) New national allocation policy for deceased donor kidneys in the United States and possible effect on patient outcomes. J Am Soc Nephrol 25:1842–1848. doi:10.1681/ASN.2013070784

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan LC, Ichord RN, Reinhartz O et al (2015) Neurological complications and outcomes in the Berlin Heart EXCOR® pediatric investigational device exemption trial. J Am Heart Assoc 4:e001429–e001429. doi:10.1161/JAHA.114.001429

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kandaswamy R, Skeans MA, Gustafson SK et al (2015) OPTN/SRTR 2013 annual data report: pancreas. Am J Transplant 15(Suppl 2):1–20. doi:10.1111/ajt.13196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keating DT, Marasco SF, Negri J et al (2010) Long-term outcomes of cadaveric lobar lung transplantation: helping to maximize resources. J Heart Lung Transplant 29:439–444. doi:10.1016/j.healun.2009.09.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kim WR, Lake JR, Smith JM et al (2015) OPTN/SRTR 2013 annual data report: liver. Am J Transplant 15(Suppl 2):1–28. doi:10.1111/ajt.13197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klarenbach S, Gill JS, Knoll G et al (2014) Economic consequences incurred by living kidney donors: a Canadian multi-center prospective study. Am J Transplant 14:916–922. doi:10.1111/ajt.12662

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Marasco SF, Than S, Keating D et al (2012) Cadaveric lobar lung transplantation: technical aspects. Ann Thorac Surg 93:1836–1842. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.03.051

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McDiarmid SV, Davies DB, Edwards EB (2000) Improved graft survival of pediatric liver recipients transplanted with pediatric-aged liver donors. Transplantation 70:1283–1291

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammad S, Hormaza L, Neighbors K et al (2012) Health status in young adults two decades after pediatric liver transplantation. Am J Transplant 12:1486–1495. doi:10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04080.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • National Organ Transplantation Act of 1984, Pub L. 98–507, 98 Stat. 2339–2348 (Oct. 19, 1984). pp 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Neto JS, Carone E, Pugliese RPS et al (2010) Modified pediatric end-stage liver disease scoring system and pediatric liver transplantation in Brazil. Liver Transpl 16:426–430. doi:10.1002/lt.22000

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Niebler RA, Shah TK, Mitchell ME et al (2016) Ventricular assist device in single-ventricle heart disease and a superior cavopulmonary anastomosis. Art Organs 40(2):180–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OPTN Policies. In: http://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/contentdocuments/optn_policies.pdf. Accessed 12 Nov 2015

  • OPTN Website. SRTR data. In: http://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/converge/resources/allocationcalculators.asp?index=81. Accessed 12 Nov 2015

  • Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network – HRSA (1998) Final rule with comment period. Fed Regist 63:16296–16338

    Google Scholar 

  • Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN). Allocation of kidneys. In: http://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/converge/resources/allocationcalculators.asp?index=81. Accessed 27 Oct 2015

  • Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN). Kidney donor profile index calculator. In: http://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/converge/resources/allocationcalculators.asp?index=81. Accessed 27 Oct 2015

  • Rao PS, Schaubel DE, Guidinger MK et al (2009) A comprehensive risk quantification score for deceased donor kidneys: the kidney donor risk index. Transplantation 88:231–236. doi:10.1097/TP.0b013e3181ac620b

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls J (2009) A theory of justice. Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyes J (2005) A critical analysis to a critical analysis: breaking the circle of organ allocation in the United States. Liver Transpl 11:737–738. doi:10.1002/lt.20451

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rossano JW, Lorts A, VanderPluym CJ et al (2016) Outcomes of pediatric patients supported with continuous-flow ventricular assist devices: a report from the Pediatric Interagency Registry for Mechanical Circulatory Support (PediMACS). J Heart Lung Transplant 35(5):585–590

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salomon DR, Langnas AN, Reed AI et al (2015) AST/ASTS workshop on increasing organ donation in the United States: creating an “arc of change” from removing disincentives to testing incentives. Am J Transplant 15:1173–1179. doi:10.1111/ajt.13233

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith HJ (2015) The ethical implications and religious significance of organ transplantation payment systems. Med Health Care Philos. doi:10.1007/s11019-015-9632-y

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith JM, Biggins SW, Haselby DG et al (2012) Kidney, pancreas and liver allocation and distribution in the United States. Am J Transplant 12:3191–3212. doi:10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04259.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Smits JM, Thul J, De Pauw M et al (2014) Pediatric heart allocation and transplantation in Eurotransplant. Transpl Int 27:917–925. doi:10.1111/tri.12356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trivedi JR, Cheng A, Singh R et al (2014) Survival on the heart transplant waiting list: impact of continuous flow left ventricular assist device as bridge to transplant. Ann Thorac Surg 98:830–834. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.05.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • UN General Assembly, Declaration of the Rights of the Child

    Google Scholar 

  • UNOS (2016) OPTN policies. pp 1–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Meter CH (1999) The organ allocation controversy: how did we arrive here? Ochsner J 1:6–11. doi:10.1111/ajt.13233

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Veatch RM (2000) Transplantation ethics. Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren PH, Gifford KA, Hong BA et al (2014) Development of the national living donor assistance center: reducing financial disincentives to living organ donation. Prog Transplant 24:76–81. doi:10.7182/pit2014593

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wiesner RH, Mcdiarmid SV, Kamath PS et al (2001) MELD and PELD: application of survival models to liver allocation. Liver Transpl 7:567–580. doi:10.1053/jlts.2001.25879

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wiesner R, Edwards E, Freeman R et al (2003) Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) and allocation of donor livers. YGAST 124:91–96. doi:10.1053/gast.2003.50016

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to B. J. Hong , J. M. Smith or E. K. Hsu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this entry

Cite this entry

Hong, B.J., Smith, J.M., Hsu, E.K. (2016). Organ Allocation for Children. In: Dunn, S., Horslen, S. (eds) Solid Organ Transplantation in Infants and Children. Organ and Tissue Transplantation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08049-9_5-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08049-9_5-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08049-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics