Skip to main content

The Normal Electrocardiogram and Vectorcardiogram

  • Reference work entry
Comprehensive Electrocardiology

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,399.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Mason, J.W., D.J. Ramseth, D.O. Chanter, T.E. Moon, D.B. Goodman, and B. Mendzelevski, Electrocardiographic reference ranges derived from 79,743 subjects. J. Electrocardiol., 2007;40: 228–234.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Simonson, E., Differentiation Between Normal and Abnormal in Electrocardiography. St. Louis, MI: Mosby, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lundh, B., On the normal scalar ECG. A new classification system considering age, sex and heart position, PhD thesis. Lund: University of Lund. Acta Med. Scand., 1984; Suppl. 691.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Macfarlane, P.W., J.A. MacLean, M. Low, et al., Revised limits of the normal ECG, in Advances in Electrocardiology, P. D’Alché, Editor. Caen: Centre de Publications de I’Université de Caen, 1985, pp. 160–163.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Startt/Selvester, R.H., Comprehensive multilead normal ECG data base for the next few decades, in Computer ECG Analysis: Towards Standardization, J.L. Willems, J.H. van Bemmel, and C. Zywietz, Editors. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1986, pp. 221–226.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ostrander, L.D. Jr., Bundle-branch block. An epidemiologic study. Circulation, 1964;30: 872–871.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Anonymous, Unrecognised myocardial infarction. Lancet, 1976;2: 449–450.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Margolis, J.R., W.B. Kannel, M. Feinleib, T.R. Dawber, and P.M. McNamara, Clinical features of unrecognized myocardial infarction-Silent and symptomatic. Eighteen year follow-up: the Framingham study. Am. J. Cardiol., 1973;32:1–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Medalie, J.H. and U. Goldbourt, Unrecognized myocardial infarction: Five year incidence, mortality and risk factors. Ann. Intern. Med., 1976;84: 526–531.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Schwartz, D., R. Flamant, and J. Lellouch, Clinical Trials. New York: Academic Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jain, U. and P.M. Rautaharju, The use of discretized features for classification of electrocardiograms, in Optimization of Computer ECG Processing, H.K. Wolf and P.W. Macfarlane, Editors. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1980 pp. 117–120.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Macfarlane, P.W., B. Devine, S. Latif, S. McLaughlin, D.B. Shoat, and M.P. Watts, Methodology of ECG interpretation in the Glasgow program. Meth. Inform. Med., 1990;29: 354–361.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Macfarlane, P.W., B. Devine, and E. Clark, The University of Glasgow (Uni-G) ECG analysis program. Comput. Cardiol., 2005;32: 451–454.

    Google Scholar 

  14. McLaughlin, S., T.C. Aitchison, T.-F. Yang, and P.W. Macfarlane, Smoothing techniques for improving the repeatability of the automated diagnosis of inferior myocardial infarction.J. Electrocardiol., 1994;27(Suppl): 182–187.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. McLaughlin, S., T.C. Aitchison, and P.W. Macfarlane, Methods for improving the repeatability of automated ECG analysis. Meth. Inform. Med., 1995;34: 272–282.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Dudeck, J. and J. Michaelis, Problems in the diagnostic process in electrocardiography, in Computer Application on ECG and VCG Analysis, C. Zywietz and B. Schneider, Editors. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1973, pp. 283–295.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Abreu-Lima, C., D.M. Correia, J. Almeida, M. Antunes-Lopes, and M. Cerqueira-Gomes, A new ECG classification system for myocardial infarction based on receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and information theory. Circulation, 1983;67: 1252–1257.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rautaharju, P.M., H.W. Blackburn, and J.W. Warren, The concepts of sensitivity, specificity and accuracy in the evaluation of electrocardiographic, vectorcardiographic and polarcardiographic criteria. J. Electrocardiol., 1976;9: 275–281.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bailey, J.J., Evaluation methodologies, in Computerized Interpretation of the Electrocardiogram VI, R. Bonner, Editor. New York: Engineering Foundation, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Blackburn, H., A. Keys, E. Simonson, P. Rautaharju, andS. Punsar, The electrocardiogram in population studies. A classification system. Circulation, 1960;21: 1160–1175.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kossmann, C.E., D.A. Brody, G.E. Burch, et al., Report of Committee on Electrocardiography, American Heart Association. Recommendations for standardization of leads and of specifications for instruments in electrocardiography and vectorcardiography. Circulation, 1967;35: 583–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Prineas, R.J., R.S. Crow, and H. Balckburn, The Minnesota Code Manual of Electrocardiographic Findings, 2nd edn., London: Springer, 2010.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Pipberger, H.V., R.C. Arzbaecher, A.S. Berson, et al., Report of the Committee on Electrocardiography, American Heart Association. Recommendations for standardization of leads and of specifications for instruments in electrocardiography and vectorcardiography. Circulation, 1975;52(AHA Suppl): 11–31.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Farb, A., R.B. Devereux, and P. Kligfield, Day-to-day variability of voltage measurements used in electrocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., 1990;15: 618–623.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. CSE Working Party, Recommendations for measurement standards in quantitative electrocardiography. Eur. Heart J., 1985;6: 815–825.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Chung, E.K., Electrocardiography: Practical Applications with Vectorial Principles, 2nd edn. Hagerstown, MD: Harper and Row, 1980, pp. 22–25.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Chou, T.-C., Electrocardiography in Clinical Practice, 2nd edn. Orlando, FL: Grune and Stratton, 1986, pp. 7–10.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Holzmann, M., Klinische Electrokardiographie, 3rd edn. Stuttgart: Thieme, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rowlands, D.J., The normal ECG, Section I, Understanding the Electrocardiogram: A New Approach. Macclesfield: ICI, 1980, pp. 46–50.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Willems, J.L,, E.O. Robles de Medina, R. Bernard, et al., WHO/ISFC Task Force. Criteria for intraventricular conduction disturbances and pre-excitation. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., 1985;5: 1261–1275.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Macfarlane, P.W., M. Marriott, M.J. Podolski, D. MacFarlane, and T.D.V. Lawrie, Simultaneous 3-orthogonal and 12-lead hybrid electrocardiogram, in Computerized Interpretation of Electrocardiograms VIII, R.H. Selvester andD. Geselowitz, Editors. New York: Engineering Foundation, 1984, pp. 159–169.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Draper, H.W., C.J. Peffer, F.W. Stallmann, D. Littmann, and H.V. Pipberger, The corrected orthogonal electrocardiogram and vectorcardiogram in 510 normal men (Frank lead system). Circulation, 1964;30: 853–864.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Willems, J.L., Common Standards for Quantitative Electrocardiography (EEC Concerted Action Project II.2.2). 2nd Progress Report. CSE Ref. 82-11-20. Leuven: ACCO, 1982, pp. 127–227.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Macfarlane, P.W., D.K. MacFarlane, M. Podolski, and T.D.V. Lawrie, The ECG analysis program for the MINGOCARE system. Electromedica, 1984;52: 126–136.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Willems, J.L., P. Arnaud, J.H. van Bemmel, et al., Assessment of the performance of electrocardiographic computer programs with the use of a reference data base. Circulation, 1985;71:523–534.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Willems, J.L., P. Arnaud, J.H. van Bemmel, et al., Establishment of a reference library for evaluating computer ECG measurement programs. Comput. Biomed. Res., 1985;18: 439–457.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Rose, G.A. and H. Blackburn, Cardiovascular Survey Methods. Geneva: WHO, 1968, Monograph Series No.56.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Willems, J.L., Common Standards for Quantitative Electrocardiography (EEC Concerted Action Project II.2.2). 4th Progress Report. CSE Ref. 84-11-15. Leuven: ACCO, 1984, pp. 73–152.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Willems, J.L., P.F. Poblete, and H.V. Pipberger, Day-to-day variation of the normal orthogonal electrocardiogram and vectorcardiogram. Circulation, 1972;45: 1057–1064.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Simonson, E., J. Brozek, and A. Keys, Variability of the electrocardiogram in normal young men. Am. Heart J., 1949;38: 407–422.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Cawood, H.T., P.W. Macfarlane, S. Hillis, and T.D.V. Lawrie, Day to day and beat to beat variation in normal 3 orthogonal lead electrocardiograms. Br. Heart J., 1974;36: 1225–1230.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Simonson, E., The electrocardiogram in coronary heart disease. Minn. Med., 1955;38:871–873.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Graybiel, A., Starr, R.S., and P.D. White, Electrocardiographic changes following the inhalation of tobacco smoke. Am. Heart J., 1938;15: 89–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Wilson, F.N. and R. Finch, The effect of drinking iced-water upon the form of the T detection of the electrocardiogram. Heart, 1923;10. 275–278.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Sears, G.A. and G.W. Manning, Routine electrocardiography: postprandial T wave changes. Am. Heart J., 1958;56: 591–597.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Magendantz, H. and J. Shortsleeve, Electrocardiographic abnormalities in patients exhibiting anxiety. Am. Heart J., 1951;42: 849–857.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Marriott, H.J.L., Practical Electrocardiography, 6th edn. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins, 1977, pp. 266–269.

    Google Scholar 

  48. LaMonte, C.S. and A.H. Freiman, The electrocardiogram after mastectomy. Circulation, 1965;32: 746–754.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Rautaharju, P., L. Park, F.S. Rautaharju, and R. Crow, A standardizes procedure for locating and documenting ECG chest electrode positions. J. Electrocardiol., 1998;31: 17–29.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Scherer, M.L., T. Aspelund, S. Sigurdsson, R. Detrano, M. Garcia, G.F. Mitchell, L.J. Launer, G. Thorgeirsson, V. Gudnason, and T.B. Harris, Abnormal T-wave axis is associated with coronary artery calcification in older adults. Scan. Cardiovasc. J., 2008;1–9:iFirst Article URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14017430802471483

  51. Tomlinson, D.R., Y. Bashir, T.R. Betts, and K. Rajappan, Accuracy of manual QRS duration assessment: its importance in patient selection for cardiac resynchronization and implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy. Europace, 2009;11: 638–642.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Littmann, D., Persistence of the juvenile pattern in the precordial leads of healthy adult Negroes, with report of electrocardiographic survey on three hundred Negro and two hundred white subjects. Am. Heart J., 1946;32: 370–382.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Keller, D.H. and J.B. Johnston, The T wave of the unipolar precordial electrocardiogram in normal adult Negro subjects. Am. Heart J., 1952;44: 494–498.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Walker, A.R.P. and B.F. Walker, The bearing of race, sex, age, and nutritional state on the precordial electrocardiograms of young South African Bantu and Caucasian subjects. Am. Heart J., 1969;77: 441–459.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Katibi, I.A., Normal limits of the 12 lead ECG in a healthy Nigerian cohort, MD Thesis. University of Glasgow. In preparation.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Macfarlane, P.W., C.Y. Chen, and B.N. Chiang, Comparison of the ECG in apparently healthy Chinese and Caucasians, in Computers in Cardiology, K. Ripley, Editor. 1987. Baltimore, MD: IEEE Computer Society Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Macfarlane, P.W., M.P. Watts, M. Podolski, D. Shoat, and T.D.V. Lawrie, The new Glasgow system, in Computer ECG Analysis: Towards Standardization, J.L. Willems, J.H. van Bemmel, and C. Zywietz, Editors. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1986, pp. 31–36.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Chen, C.Y., B.N. Chiang, and P.W. Macfarlane, Normal limits of the electrocardiogram in a Chinese population. J. Electrocardiol., 1989;22: 1–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Wu, J., J.A. Kors, P.R. Rijnbeek, G. van Herpen, Z. Lu, and C. Xu, Normal limits of the electrocardiogram in Chinese subjects. Int. J. Cardiol., 2003;87: 37–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Pipberger, H.V., E. Simonson, E.A. Lopez Jr., M.A. Araoye, and H.A. Pipberger, The electrocardiogram in epidemiologic investigations. A new classification system. Circulation, 1982;65: 1456–1464.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Pipberger, H.V., M.J. Goldman, D. Littmann, G.P. Murphy,J. Cosma, and J.R. Snyder, Correlations of the orthogonal electrocardiogram and vectorcardiogram with constitutional variables in 518 normal men. Circulation, 1967;35: 536–551.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Nemati, M., J.T. Doyle, D. McCaughan, R.A. Dunn, and H.V. Pipberger, The orthogonal electrocardiogram in normal women. Implications of sex differences in diagnostic electrocardiography. Am. Heart J., 1978;95: 12–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Keys, A., F. Fidanza, M.J. Karvonen, N. Kimura, and H.L. Taylor, Indices of relative weight and obesity. J. Chronic Dis., 1972;25: 329–343.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Matthes, T., G. Gottsch, and C. Zywietz, Interactive analysis of statistical ECG, diagnosis on an intelligent electrocardiograph—an expert system approach, in Computer ECG Analysis: Towards Standardization, J.L. Willems, J.H. van Bemmel, and C. Zywietz, Editors. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1986, pp. 215–220.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Oakley, D.G. and C.M. Oakley, Significance of abnormal electrocardiograms in highly trained athletes. Am. J. Cardiol., 1982;50: 985–989.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Fagard, R., A. Aubert, J. Staessen, E. van den Eynde, L. Vanhees, and A. Amery, Cardiac structure and function in cyclists and runners. Comparative echocardiographic study. Br. Heart J., 1984;52: 124–129.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Shapiro, L.M., Physiological left ventricular hypertrophy.Br. Heart J., 1984;52: 130–135.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Pellicacia, A., F.M. Di Paolo, F.M. Quattrini, C. Basso, F. Culasso, G. Popoli, R. De Luca, A. Spataro, A. Biffi, G. Thiene, and B.J. Marron, Outcomes in athletes with marked ECG repolarization abnormalities. N. Eng. J. Med., 2008;358(2): 152–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Oakley, D., Cardiac hypertrophy in athletes. Br. Heart J., 1984;52: 121–123.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Lawless, C.E. and T. Best, Electrocardiograms in athletes: interpretation and diagnostic accuracy. Med. Sci. Sports Exer., 2008;40: 787–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Corrado, D., A. Pelliccia, H.H. Bjornstad, L. Vanhees, A. Biffi, M. Borjesson, N. Panhuyzen-Goedkoop, et al., Cardiovascular pre-participation screening of young competitive athletes for prevention of sudden death: proposal for a common European protocol. Consensus statement of the Study Group of Sport Cardiology of the Working Group of Cardiac Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology and the Working Group of Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur. Heart J., 2005;26: 516–524.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Wilson, F.N., F.D. Johnston, F.F. Rosenbaum, et al., The precordial electrocardiogram. Am. Heart J., 1944;27:19–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Liebman, J., R. Plonsey, and P.C. Gillette, eds. Pediatric Electrocardiography. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Sreenivasan, V.V., B.J. Fisher, J. Liebman, and T.D. Downs, Longitudinal study of the standard electrocardiogram in the healthy premature infant during the first year of life. Am. J. Cardiol., 1973;31: 57–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Liebman, J., H.C. Romberg, T. Downs, and R. Agusti, The Frank QRS vectorcardiogram in the premature infant, in Vectorcardiography, I. Hoffman and R.C. Taylor, Editors. 1965. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1966, pp. 256–271.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Davignon, A., P. Rautaharju, E. Boiselle, F. Soumis, M. Megelas, and A. Choquette, Normal ECG standards for infants and children. Pediatr. Cardiol., 1979;1: 123–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Ziegler, R.F., Electrocardiographic Studies in Normal Infants and Children. Springfield, IL: Thomas, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Strong, W.B., T.D. Downs, J. Liebman, and R. Liebowitz, The normal adolescent electrocardiogram. Am. Heart J., 1972;83: 115–128.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Macfarlane, P.W., E.N. Coleman, E.O. Pomphrey, S. McLaughlin, A. Houston, and T. Aitchisonn, Normal limits of the high-fidelity pediatric ECG: Preliminary observations. J. Electrocardiol., 1990;22(Suppl. 1): 162–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Rijnbeek, P.R., M. Witsenburg, E. Schrama, J. Hess, and J.A. Kors, New normal limits for the paediatric electrocardiogram. Eur. Heart J., 2001;22(8): 702–711.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Sun, K., F. Li, Y. Zhou, A.M. Dubin, P.M. Rautaharju, J. Liebman, R.E. Gregg, E.D. Helfenbein, J.M. Lindauer, and S.H. Zhou, Normal ECG limits for Asian infants and children. Comput. Cardiol., 2005;32: 455–458.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Guller, B., F.Y.K. Lau, R.A. Dunn, H.A. Pipberger, and H.V. Pipberger, Computer analysis of changes in Frank vectorcardiograms of 666 normal infants in the first 72 hours of life.J. Electrocardiol., 1977;10: 19–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Chou, T.-C. and R.A. Helm, Clinical Vectorcardiography. New York: Grune and Stratton, 1967, pp. 50–63.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Cornfield, J., R.A. Dunn, C.D. Batchlor, and H.V. Pipberger, Multigroup diagnosis of electrocardiograms. Comput. Biomed. Res., 1973;6: 97–120.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Stallmann, F.W. and H.V. Pipberger, Automatic recognition of electrocardiographic waves by digital computer. Circ. Res., 1961;9: 1138–1143.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. van Bemmel, J.H., J.S. Duisterhout, G. van Herpen, L.G. Bierwolf, S.J. Hengeveld, and B. Versteeg, Statistical processing methods for recognition and classification of vectorcardiograms, in Vectorcardiography, vol. 2, I. Hoffman, R.I. Hamby, and E. Glassman, Editors. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1971, pp. 207–215.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Sano, T., F. Suzuki, T. Hiroki, and T. Sawanobori, On the spatial velocity electrocardiogram. II. Clinical application. Jpn. Heart J., 1968;9: 64–75.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Macfarlane, P.W., J. Mitchell, and T.D.V. Lawrle, Spatial velocity of the heart vector, in Proceedings of the XIIth International Colloquium on Vectorcardiographicum, P. Rijlant, Editor. Brussels: Presses Academiques Européennes, 1972, pp. 343–346.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Morris, J.J. Jr., E.H. Estes Jr., R.E. Whalen, H.K. Thompson Jr., and H.D. McIntosh, P wave analysis in valvular heart disease. Circulation, 1964;29: 242–252.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Cabrera, E., Électrocardiographie Clinique: Théorie et Pratique. Paris: Masson, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Sokolow, M. and T.P. Lyon, The ventricular complex in left ventricular hypertrophy is obtained by unipolar precordial and limb leads. Am. Heart J., 1949;37: 161–186.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Andersen, H.R., D. Nielsen, and L.G. Hansen, The normal right chest electrocardiogram. J. Electrocardiol., 1987;20: 27–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. Taha, B., S. Reddy, M.D. Agarwal, and K. Khaw, Normal limits of ST segment measurements in posterior ECG leads.J. Electrocardiol., 1998;31(Suppl. 1): 178–179.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Macfarlane, P., J. Petryka, and E. Kaczmarska, Influence of age and sex on normal limits of ST-T amplitudes in right-sided and posterior chest leads. J. Electrocardiol., 2006;39(Suppl. 1), S129–S130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Wagner, G.S., P. Macfarlane, H. Wellens, et al., AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: Part VI. Acute ischemia/infarction. JACC, 2009;53: 1003–1011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Grant, R.P. and R.H. Murray, The QRS complex deformity of myocardial infarction in the human subject. Am. J. Med., 1954;17: 587–609.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Ueda, H., I. Donomae, E. Kimura, et al., The normal value of electrocardiogram in the Japanese. The Report of the Committee on the Criteria of the Heart Disease and Electrocardiogram. Jpn. Heart J., 1963;4: 141–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Hsu, T.S., C.W. Chiang, and Y.S. Lee, A vectorcardiographic study of normal Chinese adults with some relevant echocardiographic and electrocardiographic observation. Taiwan I Hsueh Hui Tsa Chih, 1983;82: 410–418.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. Burns-Cox, C.J., L.C. Lau, and B.H. Toh, The electrocardiogram of healthy young Chinese and Malay men. J. Electrocardiol., 1971;4: 211–219.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. Wang, K., R.W. Asinger, and H.J.L. Marriott, ST-T segment elevation in conditions other than acute myocardial infarction.N. Eng. J. Med., 2003;349: 22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Ginzton, L.E. and M.M. Laks, The differential diagnosis of acute pericarditis from the normal variant: new electrocardiographic criteria. Circulation, 1982;65: 1004–1009.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. Ahnve, S., E. Gilpin, E.B. Madsen, V. Froelicher, H. Henning, and J. Ross Jr., Prognostic importance of QTc interval at discharge after acute myocardial infarction: a multicenter study of 865 patients. Am. Heart J., 1984;108: 395–400.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. Krapf, R. and M. Gertsch, Torsade de pointes induced by sotalol despite therapeutic plasma sotalol concentrations. Br. Med. J., 1985;290: 1784–1785.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  104. Al-Khatib SM, LaPointe NM, Kramer JM, Califf RM. What clinicians should know about the QT interval. J.A.M.A., 2003;289: 2120–2127.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Bazett, H.C., An analysis of the time relations of electrocardiograms. Heart, 1920;7: 353–370.

    Google Scholar 

  106. Hodges, M., D. Salerno, and D. Erlien, Bazett’s QT correction reviewed. Evidence that a linear QT correction for heart is better. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., 1983;1: 694. [Abstract.]

    Google Scholar 

  107. Fridericia, L.S., Die Systolendauer im Elektrokardiogramm bei normalen Menschen und bei Herzkranken. Acta. Med. Scan., 1920;53: 469–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. Luo, S., P. Johnson, K. Michler, and P.W. Macfarlane, A comparison of commonly used Qt correction formulae: the effect of heart rate on the QTc of normal ECGs. J. Electrocardiol., 2004;37(Suppl.): 81–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Bourdillon, P.J. and J.P. Mulrow, QRS duration is an independent predictor of QT duration. Abstracts. Computer ECG Analysis: Towards Standardization. Leuven: CSE Working Conference, 1985: 23.

    Google Scholar 

  110. Wilson, F.N., A.G. Macleod, P.S. Barker, and F.D. Johnston, The determination and the significance of the areas of the ventricular deflections of the electrocardiogram. Am. Heart J., 1934;10:46–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Rautaharju, P.M., M. Ariet, T.A. Pryor, et al., Task Force III. Computers in diagnostic electrocardiography. Am. J. Cardiol., 1978;41: 158–170.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  112. Wolf, H.K., P.J. Maclnnis, S. Stock, R.K. Helppi, and P.M. Rautaharju, The Dalhousie program: a comprehensive analysis program for rest and exercise electrocardiograms, in Computer Application on ECG and VCG Analysis, C. Zywietz and B. Schneider, Editors. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1973, pp. 231–240.

    Google Scholar 

  113. Duisterhout, J.S., J.F. May, and G. van Herpen, A computer program for classification of ECGs according to the Minnesota Code, in Trends in Computer-Processed Electrocardiograms, J.H. van Bemmel and J.L. Willems, Editors. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1977, pp. 345–352.

    Google Scholar 

  114. Tuinstra, C.L. and F.H. Bonjer, Validation of a Minnesota Code program, in Trends in Computer-Processed Electrocardiograms, J.H. van Bemmel and J.L. Willems, Editors. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1977, pp. 353–355.

    Google Scholar 

  115. Macfarlane, P.W. and S. Latif, Automated serial comparison based on the Minnesota Code. J. Electrocardiol., 1996;29(Suppl. 1): 29–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Tuinstra, C.L., P.M. Rautaharju, R.J. Prineas, and J.S. Duisterhout, Comparison of the operational value of six systems to assess the Minnesota Code, in New Frontiers of Electrocardiology, F. de Padua and P.W. Macfarlane, Editors. Chichester: Research Studies Press, 1981, pp. 487–492.

    Google Scholar 

  117. Punsar, S., K. Pyoriila, and P. Siltanen, Classification of electrocardiographic S-T segment changes in epidemiological studies of coronary heart disease. Ann. Med. Intern. Fenn., 1968;57: 53–63.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  118. Rautaharju, P.M., L.P. Park, B.R. Chaitman, F. Rautaharju, and Z.-M. Zhang, The Novacode criteria for classification of ECG abnormalities and their clinically significant progression and regression. J. Electrocardiol., 1998;31: 157–187.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  119. Joy, M., (ed) The First European Workshop in Aviation Cardiology. Eur. Heart J., 1992;13(Suppl. H): 1–175.

    Google Scholar 

  120. Joy, M., (ed) The Second European Workshop in Aviation Cardiology. Eur. Heart J., 1999;20(Suppl. D): D1– D136.

    Google Scholar 

  121. Katritsis, D.G. and M.M. Webb-People, Occupational and regulatory aspects of heart disease. ESC Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine, 2nd edn. Chapter 38, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag London Ltd.

About this entry

Cite this entry

Macfarlane, P.W., Lawrie, T.D.V. (2010). The Normal Electrocardiogram and Vectorcardiogram. In: Macfarlane, P.W., van Oosterom, A., Pahlm, O., Kligfield, P., Janse, M., Camm, J. (eds) Comprehensive Electrocardiology. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-046-3_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-046-3_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84882-045-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84882-046-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics