Abstract
Engineering as a profession unquestionably contributes to the welfare of humanity, yet it is becoming more and more evident that the standard engineering curriculum, a product of the post-World War II era, is no longer optimal for the globally competitive, entrepreneurial firms of the knowledge economy. Further, as engineered systems become more widespread and increasingly coupled with cultural and natural systems, the impacts of new technologies become more unpredictable. Engineering in such a complex and rapidly changing environment requires engineers that are increasingly sophisticated with respect to the challenges of sustainability and complex adaptive systems. Thus, an educational system appropriate for the Anthropocene (the “Age of the Human”) is one that builds adaptive capacity into the curriculum itself as well as its graduates. This chapter suggests that a framework – a sustainable engineering method – might facilitate the evolution of engineering education and constitute a structure for imparting competencies to students that will prove valuable and relevant in the twenty-first century. Though it cannot address all issues surrounding engineering education and is therefore not a comprehensive solution, it is meant to serve as a reference for educators as they conscientiously design each curriculum to meet the needs of students, their future employers, and the world at large.
It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent that survives. It is the one that is the most adaptable to change.
Charles Darwin
Nothing is permanent except change.
Heraclitus of Ephesus
Engineering is a powerful societal force. As engineers conceive and create the built environment, they inevitably influence social and environmental change. However, a number of groups and individuals have recently expressed concern that engineers do not sufficiently understand the context and implications of their work and that both engineering practice and engineering education have failed to adapt to the needs of a world that is growing in both population and complexity (National Academy of Engineering 2005).
In this chapter, it is not assumed that engineering and its curriculum are failing or need to be “fixed” in any way. On the contrary, modern life in developed economies provides daily reminders that engineers are competent and responsible: Aircraft take off and land safely; potable drinking water is readily available; communication networks are fast and reliable. Engineering is among the somewhat unfortunate professions that go unnoticed if done well. Attention is paid to it primarily when mistakes are made – or when the public becomes disillusioned with the products (or unintended consequences) of engineered systems.
That said, while engineering and its professional preparation may be adequate for the moment (though some dispute this), there is always room for improvement. The goals and paths to improvement are often elusive, however, and that is the topic of this chapter. Hence it will provide an overview of some of the criticisms of existing curricula followed by a discussion of calls for more sustainable engineering practice. Throughout the text, a single framework – a sustainable engineering method – will be offered as an example of one possible path toward a curriculum that meets the needs of a complex and changing world. The goal of this engineering method is to instill several competencies in students, which will be discussed below. Ultimately, the framework remains one of many possible solutions and is itself merely a preliminary concept. Moreover, the focus on incremental improvement presented in this chapter does not obviate the possibility that radical rethinking of engineering education may be necessary and desirable (Allenby 2011).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
D. Allen, B.R. Allenby, M. Bridges, J. Crittenden, C. Davidson, C. Hendrickson, et al., Benchmarking sustainable engineering education: final report (US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, 2008), http://syracusecoe.org/csengine/images/allmedia/BSEE_Final_Report_31Dec08_No_Appen_D.pdf. Retrieved 8 July 2011
B.R. Allenby, Rethinking engineering education, in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Sustainable Systems and Technology (IEEE, Chicago, 2011)
B.R. Allenby, Theory and Practice of Sustainable Engineering (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 2012)
B.R. Allenby, C.F. Murphy, D. Allen, C. Davidson, Sustainable engineering education in the United States. Sustain. Sci. 4(1), 7–15 (2009). doi:10.1007/s11625-009-0065-5
C.T. Christ, What is happening in liberal education? in Holistic Engineering Education, ed. by D. Grasso, M.B. Burkins (Springer, New York, 2010), pp. 69–79
E.F. Crawley, J. Malmqvist, S. Östlund, D.R. Brodeur, Rethinking Engineering Education: The CDIO Approach (Springer, New York, 2007)
N. Donofrio, C. Sanchez, J. Spohrer, Collaborative innovation and service systems, in Holistic Engineering Education, ed. by D. Grasso, M.B. Burkins (Springer, New York, 2010), pp. 243–269
J.J. Duderstadt, Engineering for a changing world, in Holistic Engineering Education, ed by D. Grasso, M.B. Burkins (Springer, New York, 2010), pp. 17–35
B. Finley, The business-minded engineer. Electr. Constr. Maint. 104(9), 50–55 (2005)
A.F. Fischbach, Partnering for success. Electr. Constr. Maint. 107(10), 38–44 (2008), http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20169834
S.C. Florman, The Existential Pleasures of Engineering, 2nd edn. (St. Martin’s Press, New York, 1994), p. 224
H. Gallegos, The education of an engineer in a holistic age: a latin american perspective, in Holistic Engineering Education, ed. by D. Grasso, M.B. Burkins (Springer, New York, 2010), pp. 99–111
D.E. Goldberg, The missing basics and other philosophical reflections for the transformation of engineering education, in Holistic Engineering Education, ed. by D. Grasso, M.B. Burkins (Springer, New York, 2010), pp. 145–158
T.E. Graedel, B.R. Allenby, Industrial Ecology and the Automobile (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 1998)
D. Grasso, M.B. Burkins, Holistic Engineering Education (Springer, New York, 2010)
D. Grasso, D. Martinelli, Holistic engineering, in Holistic Engineering Education, ed. by D. Grasso, M.B. Burkins (Springer, New York, 2010), pp. 11–15
D. Grasso, M.B. Burkins, J.J. Helble, D. Martinelli, Dispelling the myths of holistic engineering, in Holistic Engineering Education, ed. by D. Grasso, M.B. Burkins (Springer, New York, 2010), pp. 159–165
T.C. Kennedy, The “Value-Added” approach to engineering education: an industry perspective. Bridge Summer, 14–16 (2006)
C.P. Koshland, Liberal arts and engineering, in Holistic Engineering Education, ed. by D. Grasso, M.B. Burkins (Springer, New York, 2010), pp. 53–67
L.R. Lattuca, P.T. Terenzini, F.J. Volkwein, G.D. Peterson, The changing face of engineering education. Bridge Summer, 5–13 (2006)
National Academy of Engineering, Educating the engineer of 2020: adapting engineering education to the new century (National Academies, Washington, 2005), http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=11338&page=R1. Accessed 20 July 2011
National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying, Licensure (n.d.), http://www.ncees.org/Licensure.php. Retrieved 8 July 2011
S.D. Sheppard, K. Macatangay, A. Colby, W.M. Sullivan, Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 2009)
R.M. Stein, The path of legal education from Edward I to Langdell: a history of insular reaction. Chicago-Kent Law Rev. 57, 429–454 (1981), http://heinonlinebackup.com/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals/chknt57§ion=24. Retrieved 20 July 2011
C.K. Wise, Engineers of tomorrow: holistic-thinking system engineers, in Holistic Engineering Education, ed. by D. Grasso, M.B. Burkins (Springer, New York, 2010), pp. 227–241
P. Yunhe, On the cultivation of innovative engineering yalent, in Holistic Engineering Education, ed. by D. Grasso, M.B. Burkins (Springer, New York, 2010), pp. 113–124
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this entry
Cite this entry
Mattick, C.S., Allenby, B.R. (2013). Teaching Old Disciplines New Tricks: Sustainable Engineering Education. In: Kauffman, J., Lee, KM. (eds) Handbook of Sustainable Engineering. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8939-8_114
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8939-8_114
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8938-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8939-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringReference Module Computer Science and Engineering