Skip to main content

Seismic Robustness Analysis of Nuclear Power Plants

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Earthquake Engineering
  • 965 Accesses

Synonyms

Seismic margin assessment; Seismic PRA; Seismic probabilistic risk analysis; Seismic probabilistic safety analysis; Seismic PSA; SMA

Introduction

Nuclear Safety

Commercial nuclear power plants (NPP) are industrial facilities that represent a significant hazard potential. Consequently, the pertinent safety requirements are particularly stringent. Nuclear safety is assured by deterministic and probabilistic analysis. In deterministic analysis, the safety systems are shown to withstand design basis accidents (DBAs), typically using conservative assumptions. In probabilistic safety analysis (PSA), the frequency of accident progressions leading to core damage (PSA level 1) and large early release (PSA level 2) is quantified and compared to target values that are judged as low enough.

Consideration of Earthquakes in Nuclear Safety

Earthquakes are external hazards on which the duty holder of a nuclear facility, e.g., a nuclear power plant, has no or only little control.

Effects to be...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) (2000) Seismic analysis of safety-related nuclear structures and commentary. ASCE 4-98, Reston

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell KW, Bozorgnia Y (2011) Evaluation of the use of cumulative absolute velocity (CAV) in the shutdown of nuclear power plants after an earthquake. In: Transactions, SMiRT 21, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen W-F, Scawthorn C (eds) (2002) Earthquake engineering handbook. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) (1991) A methodology for assessment of nuclear power plant seismic margin (revision 1). Report EPRI NP-6041-SL, Palo Alto

    Google Scholar 

  • Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) (1994) Methodology for developing seismic fragilities. Report TR-103959, Palo Alto

    Google Scholar 

  • Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), U.S. Department of Energy (2006) Program on technology innovation: use of cumulative absolute velocity (CAV) in determining effects of small magnitude earthquakes on seismic hazard analyses. Report 1014099, Palo Alto/Germantown

    Google Scholar 

  • EUR Organisation (2001) European utility requirements for LWR nuclear power plants

    Google Scholar 

  • International Atomic Agency (IAEA) (2003a) Seismic design and qualification for nuclear power plants. Safety guide NS-G-16, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • International Atomic Agency (IAEA) (2003b) Seismic evaluation of existing nuclear power plants. Safety series 28, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • International Atomic Agency (IAEA) (2009) Evaluation of seismic safety for existing nuclear installations. Safety guide no. NS-G-2.13, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy RP, Ravindra MK (1984) Seismic fragilities for nuclear power plant risk studies. Nucl Eng Des 79:47–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klügel J (2007) An improved methodology for the evaluation of human error probabilities in a seismic PSA. In: Transactions, SMiRT 19, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellissetti MF, Klapp U (2011) Integration of correlation models for seismic failures into fault tree based seismic PSA. In: Transactions, SMiRT 21, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadegh-Azar H, Hartmann H-G (2011) Grundlagen der seismischen Auslegung von Kernkraftwerken und Einfluss der Boden-Bauwerk Wechselwirkung. Bauingenieur (D-A-CH-Mitteilungsblatt)

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NUREG) (1985) An approach to the quantification of seismic margins in nuclear power plants. NUREG/CR-4334, UCID-20444, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NUREG). (1986). Recommendations to the Nuclear regulatory commission on trial guidelines for seismic margin reviews of nuclear power Plants. NUREG/CR-4482, UCID-20579, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NUREG) (1987) Relay Chatter and operator response after a large earthquake. NUREG/CR-4910, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NUREG) (1990) Procedures for the external event core damage frequency analyses for NUREG-1150. NUREG/CR-4840, SAND88-3102, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NUREG). (1993). Subject: policy, technical, and licensing issues pertaining to Evolutionary and Advanced Light-Water Reactor (ALWR) designs. SECY 93–087, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Yokobayashi M et al (1998) Consideration of the effect of human error in a seismic PSA. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on probabilistic safety assessment and management, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manuel Pellissetti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this entry

Cite this entry

Pellissetti, M., Klapp, U. (2013). Seismic Robustness Analysis of Nuclear Power Plants. In: Beer, M., Kougioumtzoglou, I., Patelli, E., Au, IK. (eds) Encyclopedia of Earthquake Engineering. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36197-5_166-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36197-5_166-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-36197-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EngineeringReference Module Computer Science and Engineering

Publish with us

Policies and ethics