Skip to main content

Modeling Social Preferences Based on Social Interactions

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 175 Accesses

Synonyms

Analytical models for social preferences; Modeling social behavior

Glossary

Social preference :

is defined differently according to discipline but can generally be defined as individual biases in interaction or contact with others (direct), or favoritism towards individuals, typically because of specific attributes (e.g., sex, social status, ethnicity) or context (e.g., unequal distribution of goods), and regardless of interaction (indirect).

An affiliation network :

is a two-mode bipartite network. It contains two different types of nodes, one for actors and one for events, and edges between actors and the events in which actors participate. Examples of affiliation networks, include communication networks such as email among people, epidemiological networks that describing people and diseases with which they are infected, and citation networks containing authors and publications. In time-varying affiliation networks, an actor’s participation in a particular event is...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   1,500.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barrat A, Barthélemy M, Pastor-Satorras R, Vespignani A (2004) The architecture of complex weighted networks. Natl Acad Sci 101:3747–3752

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairns SJ, Schwager SJ (1987) A comparison of association indices. Anim Behav 35:1454–1469

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarti D, Kumar R, Tomkins A (2006) Evolutionary clustering. In: Proceedings of the international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, Philadelphia, pp 554–560

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi Y, Song X, Zhou D, Hino K, Tseng B (2007) Evolutionary spectral clustering by incorporating temporal smoothness. In: Proceedings of the international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, San Jose, pp 153–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekker D, Krackhardt D, Snijders TAB (2007) Sensitivity of MRQAP tests to collinearity and autocorrelation conditions. Psychometrika 72:563–581

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fu F, Nowak MA, Christakis NA, Fowler JH (2012) The evolution of homophily. Nat Sci Rep 2:845

    Google Scholar 

  • Girvan M, Newman MEJ (2002) Community structure in social and biological networks. Natl Acad Sci 99:7821–7826

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Habiba CT, Yu Y, Berger-Wolf T, Saia J (2008) Finding spread blockers in dynamic networks. In: Proceedings of the international conference on advances in social network mining and analysis, Las Vegas, pp 55–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinde RA, Atkinson S (1970) Assessing the roles of social partners in maintaining mutual proximity, as exemplified by mother–infant relations in rhesus monkeys. Anim Behav 18:169–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Kannan R, Vempala S, Vetta A (2000) On clusterings – good, bad and spectral. In: Proceedings of the symposium on foundations of computer science, Redondo Beach, pp 367–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter RM (1968) Commitment and social organization: a study of commitment mechanisms in utopian communities. Am Sociol Rev 33:499–517

    Google Scholar 

  • Lusseau D, Whitehead H, Gero S (2008) Incorporating uncertainty into the study of animal social networks. Anim Behav 75:1809–1815

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann J, Stanton MA, Patterson EM, Bienenstock EJ, Singh LO (2012) Social networks reveal a culture club in tool using dolphins. Nat Commun 3:980

    Google Scholar 

  • Mateos P, Longley PA, O’Sullivan D (2011) Ethnicity and population structure in personal naming networks. PLoS ONE 6(9):e22943

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson L, Cook J (2001) Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Ann Rev Sociol 27:415–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Moody J, White DR (2003) Structural cohesion and embeddedness: a hierarchical concept of social groups. Am Sociol Rev 68(1):103–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman MEJ (2004) Analysis of weighted networks. Phys Rev E 70(5):056131

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman MEJ (2006) Modularity and community structure in networks. Natl Acad Sci 103:8577–8582

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver RL (1999) Loyalty: whence consumer loyalty? J Mark 63:33–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson RJ, Grove WB (1989) Community structure and crime: testing social disorganization theory. Am J Sociol 94:774–802

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlitter N, Falkowski T (2009) Mining the dynamics of music preferences from a social networking site. In: International conference on advances in social network analysis and mining, Athens, 20–22 July 2009, pp 243–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharara H, Singh L, Getoor L, Mann J (2011) Understanding actor loyalty to event-based groups in affiliation networks. Soc Netw Anal Min 1(2): 115–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Silk JB, Beehner JC, Bergman TJ, Crockford C, Engh AL, Moscovice LR, Wittig RM, Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL (2009) The benefits of social capital: close social bonds among female baboons enhance offspring survival. Proc R Soc Lond B 276:3099–3104

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wey TW, Blumstein DT (2012) Social attributes and associated performance measures in marmots: bigger male bullies and weakly affiliating females have higher annual reproductive success. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 66(7):1075–1085

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead H (2008) Analyzing animal societies. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

Recommended Reading

  • Faust K, Wasserman S (1992) Centrality and prestige: a review and synthesis. J Quant Anthropol 4:23–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinde RA (1976) Interactions, relationships and social structure. Man 11:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman MEJ (2003) The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev 45:167–256

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Steglich CEG, Snijders TAB, Pearson M (2010) Dynamic networks and behavior: separating selection from influence. Sociol Methodol 40:329–393

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Parts of this entry are based upon the work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 0941487, 0918308 and the Office of Naval Research BAA #09-001 Grant No. 10230702.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Singh, L., Mann, J. (2014). Modeling Social Preferences Based on Social Interactions. In: Alhajj, R., Rokne, J. (eds) Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6170-8_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics