Theory and Praxis
- Ines LangemeyerAffiliated withDepartment of Economics and Social Sciences, Institute of Education, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen Email author
With regard to the transition from school to work, it is a widespread belief that theory and practice ultimately represent opposites. Quite often, their relationship is experienced as rupture, disturbance, or conflict. Within the dominant paradigm of positivism, this perception often blends into other tensions such as scientific versus experiential knowledge, reason versus emotion, culture versus nature, and so on. Critical psychology tackles the “naturalness” and the societal purpose of opposing theory and practice by reflecting the sociohistorical background of these antagonisms: above all, the division of intellectual and physical labor and the domination of the former over the latter in capitalist relations. In what follows, it is important to distinguish three levels of the theory-practice-relation: First, the experiential relation that exists between a specific theory (a theory of X) and a concrete practice (a practice of Y); second, the philosophical rela ...
- Theory and Praxis
- Reference Work Title
- Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology
- pp 1958-1965
- Print ISBN
- Online ISBN
- Springer New York
- Copyright Holder
- Springer Science+Business Media New York
- Additional Links
- eBook Packages
To view the rest of this content please follow the download PDF link above.