Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Earthquake Location , Direct, Global-Search Methods

  • Reference work entry
Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science

Definition of the Subject

An earthquake location specifies the place and time of occurrence of energy release from a seismic event. A location together witha measure of size forms a concise description of the most important characteristics of an earthquake. The location may refer to the earthquake'sepicenter, hypocenter, or centroid, or to another observed or calculated property of the earthquake that can be spatially and temporallylocalized. A location is called absolute if it is determined or specified within a fixed, geographiccoordinate system and a fixed time base (e. g., Coordinated Universal Time, UTC); a location is called relative if it is determined or specified with respect to another spatio‐temporal object (e. g., an earthquake orexplosion) which may have unknown or uncertain absolute location.

For rapid hazard assessment and emergency response , an earthquake location provides...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 3,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

Arrival time:

The time of the first measurable energy of a seismic phase on a seismogram.

Centroid:

The coordinates of the spatial or temporal average of some characteristic of an earthquake, such as surface shaking intensity or moment release.

Data space:

If the data are described by a vector d, then the data space \( { \boldsymbol{D} } \) is the set of all possible values of d.

Direct search:

A search or inversion technique that does not explicitly use derivatives.

Earthquake early‐warning :

The goal of earthquake early‐warning is to estimate the shaking hazard of a large earthquake at a nearby population center or other critical site before destructive S and surface waves have reached the site. This requires that useful, probabilistic constraint on the location and size of an earthquake is obtained very rapidly.

Earthquake location:

An earthquake location specifies a spatial position and time of occurrence for an earthquake. The location may refer to the earthquake hypocenter and corresponding origin time, a mean or centroid of some spatial or temporal characteristic of the earthquake, or another property of the earthquake that can be spatially and temporally localized. This term also refers to the process of locating an earthquake.

Epicenter :

The point on the Earth's surface directly above a hypocenter.

Error :

A specified variation in the value assumed by a variable. See also uncertainty.

Global search:

A search or inversion that samples throughout the prior pdf of the unknown parameters.

Hypocenter :

The point in three‐dimensional space of initial energy release of an earthquake rupture or other seismic event.

Importance sampling :

A sampling procedure that draws samples following the posterior pdf of an inverse, optimization or other search problem. Since these problems involve initially unknown, posterior pdf functions, importance sampling can only be performed approximately, usually through some adaptive or learning procedure as sampling progresses.

Inverse problem , inversion :

The problem of determining the parameters of a physical system given some data. The solution of an inverse problem requires measurements of observable quantities of the physical system, and the mathematical expression (the forward problem) that relates the parameters defining the physical system (model space) to the data (data space). In inverse problems, estimates of the unknown parameters in the model space and of their uncertainties are sought from the combination of the available information on the model parameters (prior pdf), the data and the forward problem.

Likelihood function :

A non‐normalized pdf.

Misfit function:

A function that quantifies the disagreement between observed and calculated values of one or more quantities. See objective function .

Model space:

If the model parameters are described by a vector m, then model space \( { \boldsymbol{M} } \) is the set of all possible values of m.

Objective function:

A function expressing the quality of any point in the model space. Inversion and optimization procedures use an objective function to rank and select models. Usually objective functions are defined in terms of misfit functions, and for probabilistic inversion the objective function must be a pdf or likelihood function.

Origin time :

The time of occurrence of initial energy release of an earthquake rupture or other seismic event.

Prior pdf:

A pdf that expresses the information on the unknown parameters available before an inverse problem is solved. For an earthquake location, the prior pdf is often a simple function (e. g., boxcar) of three spatial dimensions and time. See also Inverse problem.

Probability density function  – pdf:

A function in one or more dimensional space X that (i) when integrated over some interval \( { \Delta \mathbf{x} } \) in \( { \boldsymbol{X} } \) gives a probability of occurrence of any event within \( { \Delta \mathbf{x} } \), and (ii) has unit integral over space X, where X represents a space of possible events. An earthquake location pdf is often a 3‑dimensional probability density function over all possible spatial locations or a 4‑dimensional probability density function over all possible spatial locations and times of occurrence.

Posterior pdf:

A pdf that expresses the information about the unknown parameters available after inversion. The posterior pdf for an earthquake location is often a function of the three spatial dimensions and the origin time of the hypocenter parameters; this function may be complicated. See also Inverse problem.

Ray path:

A local minimum‐time path between a source and receiver of idealized, infinite frequency wave energy of a specified wave type (e. g., P or S).

Receiver or station:

Synonyms for an observation point where ground motion is detected and a seismogram recorded.

Seismic phase :

A distinct packet of energy from a seismic source. Usually refers to a specified wave type (e. g. P or S) satisfying a particular physics of wave propagation.

Seismicity:

The distribution in space and time of seismic event locations.

Seismogram:

An analogue or digital recording of the ground motion at a point (receiver or station) in the Earth. Also called a waveform.

Source:

A general term referring to an earthquake, explosion or other release of seismic energy as a physical phenomenon localized in space and time.

Station:

See receiver.

Travel time:

The time that a signal, e. g. elastic wave energy of a seismic phase, takes to propagate along a ray path between two points in a medium.

Uncertainty :

Random variation in the values assumed by a variable. See also error.

Bibliography

Primary Literature

  1. Aki K, Richards PG (1980) Quantitative Seismology. Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson K (1981) Epicentral location using arrival time order. Bull Seism Soc Am 71:541–545

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baker T, Granat R, Clayton RW (2005) Real-time Earthquake Location Using Kirchhoff Reconstruction. Bull Seism Soc Am 95:699–707

    Google Scholar 

  4. Billings SD (1994) Simulated annealing for earthquake location. Geophys J Int 118:680–692

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Buland R (1976) The mechanics of locating earthquakes. Bull Seism Soc Am 66:173–187

    Google Scholar 

  6. Calvert A, Gomez F, Seber D, Barazangi M, Jabour N, Ibenbrahim A, Demnati A (1997) An integrated geophysical investigation of recent seismicity in the Al-Hoceima region of North Morocco. Bull Seism Soc Am 87:637–651

    Google Scholar 

  7. ervený V (2001) Seismic Ray Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cua G, Heaton T (2007) The Virtual Seismologist (VS) Method: a Bayesian Approach to Earthquake Early Warning. In: Gasparini P, Gaetano M, Jochen Z (eds) Earthquake Early Warning Systems. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  9. Curtis A (1999) Optimal experiment design: Cross-borehole tomographic examples. Geophys J Int 136:637–650

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Curtis A (1999) Optimal design of focussed experiments and surveys. Geophys J Int 139:205–215

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Curtis A (2004) Theory of model-based geophysical survey and experimental design Part A – Linear Problems. Lead Edge 23(10):997–1004

    Google Scholar 

  12. Curtis A (2004) Theory of model-based geophysical survey and experimental design Part B – Nonlinear Problems. Lead Edge 23(10):1112–1117

    Google Scholar 

  13. Curtis A, Michelini A, Leslie D, Lomax A (2004) A deterministic algorithm for experimental design applied to tomographic and microseismic monitoring surveys. Geophys J Int 157:595–606

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dreger D, Uhrhammer R, Pasyanos M, Frank J, Romanowicz B (1998) Regional an far-regional earthqauke locations and source parameters using sparse broadband networks: A test on the Ridgecrest sequence. Bull Seism Soc Am 88:1353–1362

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ekström G (2006) Global Detection and Location of Seismic Sources by Using Surface Waves. Bull Seism Soc Am 96:1201–1212. doi:10.1785/0120050175

  16. Font Y, Kao H, Lallemand S, Liu CS, Chiao LY (2004) Hypocentral determination offshore Eastern Taiwan using the Maximum Intersection method. Geophys J Int 158:655–675

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Geiger L (1912) Probability method for the determination of earthquake epicenters from the arrival time only (translated from Geiger's 1910 German article). Bull St Louis Univ 8:56–71

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gentili S, Michelini A (2006) Automatic picking of P and S phases using a neural tree. J Seism 10:39–63. doi:10.1007/s10950-006-2296-6

  19. Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Hammersley JM, Handscomb DC (1967) Monte Carlo Methods. Methuen, London

    Google Scholar 

  21. Horiuchi S, Negishi H, Abe K, Kamimura A, Fujinawa Y (2005) An Automatic Processing System for Broadcasting Earthquake Alarms. Bull Seism Soc Am 95:708–718

    Google Scholar 

  22. Husen S, Smith RB (2004) Probabilistic Earthquake Relocation in Three-Dimensional Velocity Models for the Yellowstone National Park Region, Wyoming. Bull Seism Soc Am 94:880–896

    Google Scholar 

  23. Husen S, Kissling E, Deichmann N, Wiemer S, Giardini D, Baer M (2003) Probabilistic earthquake location in complex three-dimensional velocity models: Application to Switzerland. J Geophys Res 108:2077–2102

    Google Scholar 

  24. Johnson CE, Lindh A, Hirshorn B (1994) Robust regional phase association. US Geol Surv Open-File Rep pp 94–621

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kawakatsu H (1998) On the real-time monitoring of the long-period seismic wavefield. Bull Earthq Res Inst 73:267–274

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kennett BLN (1992) Locating oceanic earthquakes – the influence of regional models and location criteria. Geophys J Int 108:848–854

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kennett BLN (2006) Non-linear methods for event location in a global context. Phys Earth Planet Inter 158:46–54

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt CD, Vecchi MP (1983) Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220:671–680

    MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Lahr JC (1999) HYPOELLIPSE: A Computer Program for Determining Local Earthquake Hypocentral Parameters, Magnitude, and First-Motion Pattern (Y2K Compliant Version) 1999 Version 1.0. US Geological Survey Open-File Report, pp 99–23. http://jclahr.com/science/software/hypoellipse/hypoel/hypoman/hypomst_pdf.pdf

  30. Lepage GP (1978) A new algorithm for adaptive multi-dimensional integration. J Comput Phys 27:192–203

    ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Lomax A (2005) A Reanalysis of the Hypocentral Location and Related Observations for the Great 1906 California Earthquake. Bull Seism Soc Am 91:861–877

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lomax A (2008) Location of the Focus and Tectonics of the Focal Region of the California Earthquake of 18 April 1906. Bull Seism Soc Am98:846–860

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lomax A, Curtis A (2001) Fast, probabilistic earthquake location in 3D models using oct-tree importance sampling. Geophys Res Abstr 3:955. www.alomax.net/nlloc/octtree

  34. Lomax A, Virieux J, Volant P, Berge C (2000) Probabilistic earthquake location in 3D and layered models: Introduction of a Metropolis-Gibbs method and comparison with linear locations. In: Thurber CH, Rabinowitz N (eds) Advances in Seismic Event Location. Kluwer, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lomax A, Zollo A, Capuano P, Virieux J (2001) Precise, absolute earthquake location under Somma-Vesuvius volcano using a new 3D velocity model. Geophys J Int 146:313–331

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. Maurer HR, Boerner DE (1998) Optimized and robust experimental design. Geoph J Int 132:458–468

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. Milne J (1886) Earthquakes and Other Earth Movements. Appelton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  38. Moser TJ, van Eck T, Nolet G (1992) Hypocenter determination in strongly heterogeneous earth models using the shortest path method. J Geophys Res 97:6563–6572

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. Moser TJ, Nolet G, Snieder R (1992) Ray bending revisited. Bull Seism Soc Am 82:259–288

    Google Scholar 

  40. Mosegaard K, Tarantola A (1995) Monte Carlo sampling of solutions to inverse problems. J Geophys Res 100:12431–12447

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. Myers SC, Schultz CA (2000) Improving Sparse Network Seismic Location with Bayesian Kriging and Teleseismically Constrained Calibration Events. Bull Seism Soc Am 90:199–211

    Google Scholar 

  42. Nicholson T, Gudmundsson Ó, Sambridge M (2004) Constraints on earthquake epicentres independent of seismic velocity models. Geophys J Int 156:648–654

    Google Scholar 

  43. Nicholson T, Sambridge M, Gudmundsson Ó (2004) Three-dimensional empirical traveltimes: construction and applications. Geophys J Int 156:307–328

    Google Scholar 

  44. Podvin P, Lecomte I (1991) Finite difference computations of traveltimes in very contrasted velocity models: a massively parallel approach and its associated tools. Geophys J Int 105:271–284

    Google Scholar 

  45. Press WH, Flannery BP, Saul AT, Vetterling WT (1992) Numerical Recipes, 2nd edn. Cambridge Univ Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  46. Presti D, Troise C, De Natale G (2004) Probabilistic Location of Seismic Sequences in Heterogeneous Media. Bull Seism Soc Am 94:2239–2253

    Google Scholar 

  47. Pujol J (2000) Joint event location – The JHD technique and applications to data from local seismic networks. In: Thurber CH, Rabinowitz N (eds) Advances in Seismic Event Location. Kluwer, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  48. Rabinowitz N (2000) Hypocenter location using a constrained nonlinear simplex minimization method. In: Thurber CH, Rabinowitz N (eds) Advances in Seismic Event Location. Kluwer, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  49. Rabinowitz N, Steinberg DM (2000) A statistical outlook on the problem of seismic network configuration. In: Thurber CH, Rabinowitz N (eds) Advances in Seismic Event Location. Kluwer, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  50. Rawlinson N, Sambridge M (2004) Wave front evolution in strongly heterogeneous layered media using the fast marching method. Geophys J Int 156:631–647

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  51. Rawlinson N, Sambridge M (2004) Multiple reflection and transmission phases in complex layered media using a multistage fast marching method. Geophys 69:1338–1350

    Google Scholar 

  52. Reid HF (1910) The Mechanics of the Earthquake. Vol II of: The California Earthquake of 18 April 1906. Report of the State Earthquake Investigation Commission, Lawson AC (Chairman). Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication, vol 87 (reprinted 1969)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Rothman DH (1985) Nonlinear inversion, statistical mechanics, and residual statics estimation. Geophysics 50:2784–2796

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  54. Rydelek P, Pujol J (2004) Real-Time Seismic Warning with a Two-Station Subarray. Bull Seism Soc Am 94:1546–1550

    Google Scholar 

  55. Sambridge M (1998) Exploring multi-dimensional landscapes without a map. Inverse Probl 14:427–440

    MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  56. Sambridge M (1999) Geophysical inversion with a Neighbourhood algorithm, vol I. Searching a parameter space. Geophys J Int 138:479–494

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  57. Sambridge M (1999) Geophysical inversion with a neighbourhood algorithm, vol II. Appraising the ensemble. Geophys J Int 138:727–746

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  58. Sambridge M (2003) Nonlinear inversion by direct search using the neighbourhood algorithm. In: International Handbook of Earthquake andEngineering Seismology, vol 81B. Academic Press, Amsterdam, pp 1635–1637

    Google Scholar 

  59. Sambridge M, Drijkoningen G (1992) Genetic algorithms in seismic waveform inversion. Geophys J Int 109:323–342

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  60. Sambridge M, Gallagher K (1993) Earthquake hypocenter location using genetic algorithms. Bull Seism Soc Am 83:1467–1491

    Google Scholar 

  61. Sambridge M, Kennett BLN (1986) A novel method of hypocentre location. Geophys J R Astron Soc 87:679–697

    Google Scholar 

  62. Sambridge M, Mosegaard K (2002) Monte Carlo Methods In Geophysical Inverse Problems. Rev Geophys 40:1009–1038

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  63. Satriano C, Lomax A, Zollo A (2007) Optimal, Real-time Earthquake Location for Early Warning. In: Gasparini P, Gaetano M, Jochen Z (eds) Earthquake Early Warning Systems. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  64. Satriano C, Lomax A, Zollo A (2007) Real-time evolutionary earthquake location for seismic early warning. Bull Seism Soc Am 98:1482–1494

    Google Scholar 

  65. Sen M, Stoffa PL (1995) Global optimization methods in geophysical inversion. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p 281

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  66. Sethian JA (1999) Level set methods and fast marching methods. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  67. ShannonCE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J 27:379–423

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  68. Shearer PM (1994) Global seismic event detection using a matched filter on long-period seismograms. J Geophys Res 99:13,713–13,735

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  69. Shearer PM (1997) Improving local earthquake locations using the L1 norm and waveform cross correlation: Application to the Whittier Narrows, California, aftershock sequence. J Geophys Res 102:8269–8283

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  70. Steinberg DM, Rabinowitz N, Shimshoni Y, Mizrachi D (1995) Configuring a seismographic network for optimal monitoring of fault lines and multiple sources. Bull Seism Soc Am 85:1847–1857

    Google Scholar 

  71. Stummer P, Maurer HR, Green AG (2004) Experimental Design: Electrical resistivity data sets that provide optimum subsurface information. Geophysics 69:120–139

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  72. Tarantola A (1987) Inverse problem theory: Methods for data fitting and model parameter estimation. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  73. Tarantola A (2005) Inverse Problem Theory and Methods for Model Parameter Estimation. SIAM, Philadephia

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  74. Tarantola A, Valette B (1982) Inverse problems = quest for information. J Geophys Res 50:159–170

    Google Scholar 

  75. Thurber CH, Kissling E (2000) Advances in travel-time calculations for three-dimensional strucutres. In: Thurber CH, Rabinowitz N (eds) Advances in Seismic Event Location. Kluwer, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  76. Uhrhammer RA (1980) Analysis of small seismographic station networks. Bull Seism Soc Am 70:1369–1379

    Google Scholar 

  77. Um J, Thurber C (1987) A fast algorithm for two-point seismic ray tracing. Bull Seism Soc Am 77:972–986

    Google Scholar 

  78. van den Berg J, Curtis A, Trampert J (2003) Bayesian, nonlinear experimental design applied to simple, geophysical examples. Geophys J Int 55(2):411–421. Erratum: 2005. Geophys J Int 161(2):265

    Google Scholar 

  79. Vidale JE (1988) Finite-difference calculation of travel times. Bull Seism Soc Am 78:2062–2078

    Google Scholar 

  80. Winterfors E, Curtis A (2007) Survey and experimental design for nonlinear problems. Inverse Problems (submitted)

    Google Scholar 

  81. WitherM, Aster R, Young C (1999) An automated local and regional seismicevent detection and location system using waveform correlation. BullSeism Soc Am 8:657–669

    Google Scholar 

  82. Withers M, Aster R, Young C, Beiriger J, Harris M, Moore S, Trujillo J (1998) A comparison of select trigger algorithms for automated global seismic phase and event detection. Bull Seism Soc Am 88:95–106

    Google Scholar 

  83. Wittlinger G, Herquel G, Nakache T (1993) Earthquake location in strongly heterogeneous media. Geophys J Int 115:759–777

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  84. Zhou H (1994) Rapid 3-D hypocentral determination using a master station method. J Geophys Res 99:15439–15455

    ADS  Google Scholar 

Books and Reviews

  1. Gasparini P, Gaetano M, Jochen Z (eds) (2007) Earthquake Early Warning Systems. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lee WHK, Stewart SW (1981) Principles and applications of microearthquake networks. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Thurber CH, Rabinowitz N (eds) (2000) Advances in Seismic Event Location. Kluwer, Amsterdam

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ALomax Scientific, Mouans-Sartoux, France

    Anthony Lomax

  2. Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Roma, Italy

    Alberto Michelini

  3. ECOSSE (Edinburgh Collaborative of Subsurface Science and Engineering), Grant Institute of GeoSciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom

    Andrew Curtis

Authors
  1. Anthony Lomax
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alberto Michelini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andrew Curtis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. RAMTECH LIMITED, 122 Escalle Lane, Larkspur, CA, 94939, USA

    Robert A. Meyers Ph. D. (Editor-in-Chief) (Editor-in-Chief)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag

About this entry

Cite this entry

Lomax, A., Michelini, A., Curtis, A. (2009). Earthquake Location , Direct, Global-Search Methods. In: Meyers, R. (eds) Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30440-3_150

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation