Skip to main content

Farming-Language Dispersals: Principles

  • Reference work entry

Introduction and Definition

Among various potential “windows on our past,” one rich seam of data is all too often overlooked: the linguistic record. Above all, much of the world is so dominated by just a handful of vast language lineages as to cry out for explanation. That explanation, moreover, can only lie in the same contexts and processes that shaped humanity’s cultural and population (pre)history more widely. Indeed, of all attempts to account for these broadest of patterns in the linguistic panorama, one of the most ambitious generalizations is the “farming-language dispersals hypothesis.” Most simply put, this proposes that many of the most significant language families – in both geographical range and speaker numbers – dispersed along with, and primarily thanks to, the spread of agriculture. If so, then the modern panorama of linguistic relationships and diversity across the world would in effect still reflect, at least on the very broadest scale, the impact of the “Neolithic...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   5,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ammerman, A.J. & L.L. Cavalli-Sforza. 1984. The Neolithic transition and the genetics of populations in Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balaresque, P., G.R. Bowden, S.M. Adams, H.-Y. Leung, T.E. King, Z.H. Rosser, J. Goodwin, J-P. Moisan, C. Richard, A. Millward, A.G. Demaine, G. Barbujani, C. Previderè, I.J. Wilson, C. Tyler-Smith, et al. 2010. A predominantly Neolithic origin for European paternal lineages. PLoS Biology 8(1): p.e1000285. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, G. 2006. The agricultural revolution in prehistory: why did foragers become farmers? Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellwood, P. 2005. First farmers: the origins of agricultural societies. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellwood, P. & C. Renfrew. (ed.) 2002. Examining the farming/language dispersal hypothesis. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouckaert, R., et al. 2012. Mapping the origins and expansion of the Indo-European language family. Science 337(6097): 957-60. doi: 10.1126/science.1219669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, L., & W.J. Poser. 2008.Language classification: history and method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J.M. & P. Bellwood. 2003. Farmers and their languages: the first expansions. Science 300(5619): 597–603. doi: 10.1126/science.1078208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donohue, M., & T. Denham. 2010. Farming and language in Island Southeast Asia: reframing Austronesian history. Current Anthropology 51(2): 223–56. doi: 10.1086/650991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster, P. & C. Renfrew. 2011. Mother tongue and Y chromosomes. Science 333: 1390–1. doi: 10.1126/science.1205331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golla, V., R.S. Malhi & R.L. Bettinger. 2003. Distorting the histories of the first farmers: eLetter response to Diamond and Bellwood (2003). Science 300. Available at: http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/eletters/300/5619/597.

  • Heggarty, P. 2008. Linguistics for archaeologists: a case-study in the Andes. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 18(1): 35–56. doi: 10.1017/S0959774308000036.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heggarty, P. & D. Beresford-Jones. 2010. Agriculture and language dispersals: limitations, refinements, and an Andean exception? Current Anthropology 51(2): 163–91. doi: 10.1086/650533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heggarty, P. & C. Renfrew. forthcoming. 1.3 Introduction: languages, in P. Bahn & C. Renfrew (ed.) The Cambridge world prehistory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallory, J.P. 1989. In search of the Indo-Europeans. London: Thames & Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renfrew, C. 1987. Archaeology and language: the puzzle of Indo-European origins. London: Jonathan Cape.

    Google Scholar 

  • - 1989. World languages and human dispersals: a minimalist view, in J.A. Hall (ed) Transition to modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • - 1991. Before Babel: speculations on the origins of linguistic diversity. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 1(1): 3–23. doi: 10.1017/S0959774300000238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherratt, A. & S. Sherratt. 1988. The archaeology of Indo-European: an alternative view. Antiquity 62(236): 584-95. Available at: http://www.antiquity.ac.uk/Ant/062/Ant0620584.htm.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Heggarty .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Heggarty, P., Beresford-Jones, D. (2014). Farming-Language Dispersals: Principles. In: Smith, C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_2415

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_2415

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-0426-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-0465-2

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics