Abstract
Selection of aptamers that bind a specific ligand usually begins with a random library of RNA sequences, and many aptamers selected from such random pools have a simple stem–loop structure. We present here a computational approach for designing a starting library of RNA sequences with increased formation of complex structural motifs and enhanced affinity to a desired target molecule. Our approach consists of two steps: (1) generation of RNA sequences based on customized patterning of nucleotides with increased probability of forming a base pair and (2) a high-throughput virtual screening of the generated library to select aptamers with binding affinity to a small-molecule target. We developed a set of criteria that allows one to select a sequence with potential binding affinity from a pool of random sequences and designed a protocol for RNA 3D structure prediction. The proposed approach significantly reduces the RNA sequence search space, thus accelerating the experimental screening and selection of high-affinity aptamers.
Key words
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ellington AD, Szostak JW (1990) In vitro selection of RNA molecules that bind specific ligands. Nature 346:818–822
Tuerk C, Gold L (1990) Systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment: RNA ligands to bacteriophage T4 DNA polymerase. Science 249:505–510
Osborne SE, Ellington AD (1997) Nucleic acid selection and the challenge of combinatorial chemistry. Chem Rev 97:349–370
Chushak Y, Stone MO (2009) In silico selection of RNA aptamers. Nucleic Acids Res 37:e87
Davis JH, Szostak JW (2002) Isolation of high-affinity GTP aptamers from partially structured RNA libraries. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99:11616–11621
Carothers JM, Oestreich SC, Davis JH, Szostak JW (2004) Informational complexity and functional activity of RNA structures. J Am Chem Soc 126:5130–5135
Ruff KM, Snyder TM, Liu DR (2010) Enhanced functional potential of nucleic acid aptamer libraries patterned to increase secondary structure. J Am Chem Soc 132:9453–9464
Kim N, Gan HH, Schlick T (2007) A computational proposal for designing structured RNA pools for in vitro selection of RNAs. RNA 13:478–492
Kim N, Shin JS, Elmetwaly S et al (2007) RagPools: RNA-as-graph-pools—a web server for assisting the design of structured RNA pools for in vitro selection. Bioinformatics 23:2959–2960
Luo X, McKeague M, Pitre S et al (2010) Computational approaches toward the design of pools for the in vitro selection of complex aptamers. RNA 16:2252–2262
Lorenz R, Bernhart SH, Hoener Zu Siederdissen C et al (2011) ViennaRNA package 2.0. Algorithms Mol Biol 6:26
Mathews DH, Sabina J, Zuker M, Turner DH (1999) Expanded sequence dependence of thermodynamic parameters improves prediction of RNA secondary structure. J Mol Biol 288:911–940
Mathews DH, Turner DH (2009) NNDB: the nearest neighbor parameter database for predicting stability of nucleic acid secondary structure. Nucleic Acids Res 38:280–282
Leaver-Fay A, Tyka M, Lewis SM et al (2011) ROSETTA3: an object-oriented software suite for the simulation and design of macromolecules. Methods Enzymol 487:545–574
Das R, Karanicolas J, Baker D (2010) Atomic accuracy in predicting and designing noncanonical RNA structure. Nat Methods 7:291–294
Detering C, Varani G (2004) Validation of automated docking programs for docking and database screening against RNA drug targets. J Med Chem 47:4188–4201
Trott O, Olson AJ (2010) AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization and multithreading. J Comput Chem 31:455–461
Carothers JM, Oestreich SC, Szostak JW (2006) Aptamers selected for higher-affinity binding are not more specific for the target ligand. J Am Chem Soc 128:7929–7937
Patel DJ, Suri AK (2000) Structure, recognition and discrimination in RNA aptamer complexes with cofactors, amino acids, drugs and aminoglycoside antibiotics. J Biotechnol 74:39–60
Laing C, Schlich T (2011) Computational approaches to RNA structure prediction, analysis, and design. Curr Opin Struct Biol 21:306–318
May A, Sieker F, Zacharias M (2008) How to efficiently include receptor flexibility during computational docking. Curr Comput Aided Drug Des 4:143–153
Taylor RD, Jewsbury PJ, Essex JW (2002) A review of protein-small molecule docking methods. J Comput Aided Mol Des 16:151–166
Cruz JA, Blanchet MF, Boniecki M et al (2012) RNA-Puzzles: a CASP-like evaluation of RNA three-dimensional structure prediction. RNA 18:610–625
Fulle S, Gohlke H (2010) Molecular recognition of RNA: challenges for modelling interactions and plasticity. J Mol Recognit 23:220–231
Brooks BR, Brooks CL III, Mackerell AD Jr et al (2009) CHARMM: the biomolecular simulation program. J Comput Chem 30:1545–1614
Case DA, Cheatham TE, Darden T et al (2005) The amber biomolecular simulation programs. J Comput Chem 26:1668–1688
Disclaimer
The opinions and assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the US Air Force or the US Department of Defense. This chapter has been approved for public release with unlimited distribution.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Chushak, Y.G., Martin, J.A., Chávez, J.L., Kelley-Loughnane, N., Stone, M.O. (2014). Computational Design of RNA Libraries for In Vitro Selection of Aptamers. In: Ogawa, A. (eds) Artificial Riboswitches. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1111. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-755-6_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-755-6_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ
Print ISBN: 978-1-62703-754-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-62703-755-6
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols