Abstract
The cytogenetic analysis of single cells, such as oocytes and polar bodies, is extremely challenging. The main problem is low probability of obtaining a metaphase preparation in which all of the chromosomes are sufficiently well spread to permit accurate analysis (no overlapping chromosomes, no chromosomes lost). As a result, a high proportion of the oocytes subjected to cytogenetic analysis are not suitable for traditional chromosome banding studies or for molecular cytogenetic methods such as spectral karyotyping (SKY) or multiplex fluorescence in situ hybridization (M-FISH). Fortunately, recent innovations in whole genome amplification and microarray technologies have provided a means to analyze the copy number of every chromosome in single cells with high accuracy. Here we describe the use of such methods for the investigation of chromosome and chromatid abnormalities in human oocytes and polar bodies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Pellestor F, Andreo B, Arnal F, Humaeu C, Demaille J (2003) Maternal ageing and chromosomal abnormalities: new data drawn from in vitro unfertilized human oocytes. Hum Genet 112:195–203
Kuliev A, Cieslak J, Ilkevitch Y, Verlinsky Y (2003) Chromosomal abnormalities in a series of 6,733 human oocytes in preimplantation diagnosis for age-related aneuploidies. Reprod Biomed Online 6:54–59
Fragouli E, Escalona A, Gutiérrez-Mateo C, Tormasi S, Alfarawati S, Sepulveda S, Noriega L, Garcia J, Wells D, Munné S (2009) Comparative genomic hybridization of oocytes and first polar bodies from young donors. Reprod Biomed Online 19:228–237
Fragouli E, Alfarawati S, Goodall NN, Sánchez-GarcĂa JF, Colls P, Wells D (2011) The cytogenetics of polar bodies: insights into female meiosis and the diagnosis of aneuploidy. Mol Hum Reprod. Apr 14. [Epub ahead of print] PMID: 21493685
Angell RR (1991) Predivision in human oocytes at meiosis I: a mechanism for trisomy formation in man. Hum Genet 86:383–387
Sandalinas M, Marquez C, Munné S (2002) Spectral karyotyping of fresh, non-inseminated oocytes. Mol Hum Reprod 8:580–585
Alfarawati S, Fragouli E, Colls P, Wells D (2011) First births after preimplantation genetic diagnosis of structural chromosome abnormalities using comparative genomic hybridization and microarray analysis. Hum Reprod 26:1560–1574
GutiĂ©rrez-Mateo C, Colls P, Sánchez-GarcĂa J, Escudero T, Prates R, Wells D, MunnĂ© S (2010) Validation of microarray comparative genomic hybridization for comprehensive chromosome analysis of embryos. Fertil Steril 95:953–958
Fiorentino F, Spizzichino L, Bono S, Biricik A, Kokkali G, Rienzi L, Ubaldi FM, Iammarrone E, Gordon A, Pantos K (2011) PGD for reciprocal and Robertsonian translocations using array comparative genomic hybridization. Hum Reprod 26:1925–1935
Acknowledgement
D.W. is funded by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Jaroudi, S., Wells, D. (2013). Microarray-CGH for the Assessment of Aneuploidy in Human Polar Bodies and Oocytes. In: Homer, H. (eds) Mammalian Oocyte Regulation. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 957. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-191-2_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-191-2_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ
Print ISBN: 978-1-62703-190-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-62703-191-2
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols