Abstract
Plant disease resistance (R) proteins confer protection against specific pathogens or pathogen isolates. R proteins function by recognizing pathogen-encoded avirulence (Avr) proteins and translating this recognition event into an initiation of downstream signaling pathways. Key to understanding this process is the study of the protein–protein interactions involving R proteins. Recognition and signaling mechanisms are mediated by both intramolecular interactions that take place between different domains of R proteins as well as intermolecular interactions between R proteins and additional plant proteins. These processes have been studied in part by using Agrobacterium-mediated transient expression of R protein fragments in Nicotiana benthamiana which allows for the rapid assessment of functionality. Furthermore, pairs of proteins or protein fragments can be transiently expressed as fusions with different epitope tags. One putative protein partner is subjected to immunoprecipitation. Subsequent immunoblotting is performed to determine whether the second protein has remained associated (or co-immunoprecipitated) with the first, indicating a protein–protein interaction. This technique has contributed substantially to structure–function analyses of R proteins and to the characterization of interactions between R proteins and other plant proteins.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Hellens, R., Mullineaux, P., and Klee, H. (2000) Technical Focus: a guide to Agrobacterium binary Ti vectors, Trends Plant Sci 5, 446–451.
Wroblewski, T., Tomczak, A., and Michelmore, R. (2005) Optimization of Agrobacterium-mediated transient assays of gene expression in lettuce, tomato and Arabidopsis, Plant Biotechnol J 3, 259–273.
Voinnet, O., Rivas, S., Mestre, P., and Baulcombe, D. (2003) An enhanced transient expression system in plants based on suppression of gene silencing by the p19 protein of tomato bushy stunt virus, Plant J 33, 949–956.
McDowell, J. M., and Simon, S. A. (2008) Molecular diversity at the plant–pathogen interface, Dev Comp Immunol 32, 736–744.
Scofield, S. R., Tobias, C. M., Rathjen, J. P., Chang, J. H., Lavelle, D. T., Michelmore, R. W., and Staskawicz, B. J. (1996) Molecular basis of gene-for-gene specificity in bacterial speck disease of tomato, Science 274, 2063–2065.
Tang, X., Frederick, R. D., Zhou, J., Halterman, D. A., Jia, Y., and Martin, G. B. (1996) Initiation of plant disease resistance by physical interaction of AvrPto and Pto kinase, Science 274, 2060–2063.
Bendahmane, A., Querci, M., Kanyuka, K., and Baulcombe, D. C. (2000) Agrobacterium transient expression system as a tool for the isolation of disease resistance genes: application to the Rx2 locus in potato, Plant J 21, 73–81.
Moffett, P., Farnham, G., Peart, J., and Baulcombe, D. C. (2002) Interaction between domains of a plant NBS-LRR protein in disease resistance-related cell death, EMBO J 21, 4511–4519.
Leister, R. T., Dahlbeck, D., Day, B., Li, Y., Chesnokova, O., and Staskawicz, B. J. (2005) Molecular genetic evidence for the role of SGT1 in the intramolecular complementation of Bs2 protein activity in Nicotiana benthamiana, Plant Cell 17, 1268–1278.
Rairdan, G. J., Collier, S. M., Sacco, M. A., Baldwin, T. T., Boettrich, T., and Moffett, P. (2008) The coiled-coil and nucleotide binding domains of the potato Rx disease resistance protein function in pathogen recognition and signaling, Plant Cell 20, 739–751.
Rairdan, G. J., and Moffett, P. (2006) Distinct domains in the ARC region of the potato resistance protein Rx mediate LRR binding and inhibition of activation, Plant Cell 18, 2082–2093.
Sacco, M. A., Mansoor, S., and Moffett, P. (2007) A RanGAP protein physically interacts with the NB-LRR protein Rx, and is required for Rx-mediated viral resistance, Plant J 52, 82–93.
Tameling, W. I., and Baulcombe, D. C. (2007) Physical association of the NB-LRR resistance protein Rx with a Ran GTPase-activating protein is required for extreme resistance to potato virus X, Plant Cell 19, 1682–1694.
Komori, T., Imayama, T., Kato, N., Ishida, Y., Ueki, J., and Komari, T. (2007) Current status of binary vectors and superbinary vectors, Plant Physiol 145, 1155–1160.
Hamilton, C. M., Frary, A., Lewis, C., and Tanksley, S. D. (1996) Stable transfer of intact high molecular weight DNA into plant chromosomes, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93, 9975–9979.
Scopes, R. K., and Smith, J. A. (2006) Analysis of Proteins, in Current Protocols in Molecular Biology (Ausubel, F. M., Brent, R., Kingston, R. E., Moore, D. D., Seidman, J. G., Smith, J. A., and Struhl, K., Eds.), pp 10.10.11–10.18.28, Wiley, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Moffett, P. (2011). Fragment Complementation and Co-immunoprecipitation Assays for Understanding R Protein Structure and Function. In: McDowell, J. (eds) Plant Immunity. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 712. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61737-998-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61737-998-7_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press
Print ISBN: 978-1-61737-997-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-61737-998-7
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols