Abstract
Until the zygotic genome is activated, early development relies on the products deposited by the mother. Once the zygotic genome starts to be transcribed, most maternal products are not needed anymore by the developing embryo. This emancipation from the maternal genome occurs during the Zygotic Genome Activation (ZGA). Although the process by which the maternal content is replaced with zygotic products differs from species to species, there is a common theme to all of them: maternal transcripts are actively degraded. Here, a review of how the degradation of maternal RNAs is regulated during early development and discussions on some computational tools that may be of use in this research area are outlined.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ziegler HE (1898) Experimentelle Studien über die Zelltheilung. Arch Für Entwicklungsmechanik Org 6:249–293. doi:10.1007/BF02152958
Chambers R (1924) The physical structure of protoplasm as determined by microdissection and injection. In: Cowdry EV (ed) General cytology. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp 237–309
Briggs R, Green EU, King TJ (1951) An investigation of the capacity for cleavage and differentiation in Rana pipiens eggs lacking “functional” chromosomes. J Exp Zool 116:455–499. doi:10.1002/jez.1401160307
Redfield H (1926) The maternal inheritance of a sex-limited lethal effect in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. Genetics 11:482–502
Kalthoff K, Sander K (1968) Der Entwicklungsgang der Mißbildung “Doppelabdomen” im partiell UV-bestrahlten Ei von Smittia parthenogenetica (Dipt., Chironomidae). Wilhelm Roux Arch Für Entwicklungsmechanik Org 161:129–146. doi:10.1007/BF00585968
Gilbert SF, Singer SR, Tyler MS, Kozlowski RN (2006) Developmental biology. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA
Davidson EH (1986) Gene activity in early development, 3rd revised edn. Academic Press Inc, Orlando, FL
Slater I, Gillespie D, Slater DW (1973) Cytoplasmic adenylylation and processing of maternal RNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 70:406–411
Wilt FH (1973) Polyadenylation of maternal RNA of sea urchin eggs after fertilization. Proc Natl Acad Sci 70:2345–2349
Watson JD (1976) Molecular biology of the gene, 3rd edn. Benjamin-Cummings Publishing Co, Menlo Park, CA
Hough-Evans BR, Wold BJ, Ernst SG et al (1977) Appearance and persistence of maternal RNA sequences in sea urchin development. Dev Biol 60:258–277. doi:10.1016/0012-1606(77)90123-3
Wilt FH (1977) The dynamics of maternal poly(A)-containing mRNA in fertilized sea urchin eggs. Cell 11:673–681
Jeffery WR (1977) Polyadenylation of maternal and newly-synthesized RNA during starfish oocyte maturation. Dev Biol 57:98–108
Sagata N, Shiokawa K, Yamana K (1980) A study on the steady-state population of poly(A)+RNA during early development of Xenopus laevis. Dev Biol 77:431–448
Bachvarova R, De Leon V (1980) Polyadenylated RNA of mouse ova and loss of maternal RNA in early development. Dev Biol 74:1–8
Pikó L, Clegg KB (1982) Quantitative changes in total RNA, total poly(A), and ribosomes in early mouse embryos. Dev Biol 89:362–378
De Leon V, Johnson A, Bachvarova R (1983) Half-lives and relative amounts of stored and polysomal ribosomes and poly(A) + RNA in mouse oocytes. Dev Biol 98:400–408
Shaw G, Kamen R (1986) A conserved AU sequence from the 3’ untranslated region of GM-CSF mRNA mediates selective mRNA degradation. Cell 46:659–667
Duval C, Bouvet P, Omilli F et al (1990) Stability of maternal mRNA in Xenopus embryos: role of transcription and translation. Mol Cell Biol 10:4123–4129. doi:10.1128/MCB.10.8.4123
Bashirullah A, Halsell SR, Cooperstock RL et al (1999) Joint action of two RNA degradation pathways controls the timing of maternal transcript elimination at the midblastula transition in Drosophila melanogaster. EMBO J 18:2610–2620. doi:10.1093/emboj/18.9.2610
Tadros W, Lipshitz HD (2009) The maternal-to-zygotic transition: a play in two acts. Development 136:3033–3042. doi:10.1242/dev.033183
Walser CB, Lipshitz HD (2011) Transcript clearance during the maternal-to-zygotic transition. Curr Opin Genet Dev 21:431–443. doi:10.1016/j.gde.2011.03.003
Smibert CA, Wilson JE, Kerr K, Macdonald PM (1996) smaug protein represses translation of unlocalized nanos mRNA in the Drosophila embryo. Genes Dev 10:2600–2609. doi:10.1101/gad.10.20.2600
Smibert CA, Lie YS, Shillinglaw W et al (1999) Smaug, a novel and conserved protein, contributes to repression of nanos mRNA translation in vitro. RNA 5:1535–1547
Dahanukar A, Walker JA, Wharton RP (1999) Smaug, a novel RNA-binding protein that operates a translational switch in Drosophila. Mol Cell 4:209–218. doi:10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80368-8
Semotok JL, Cooperstock RL, Pinder BD et al (2005) Smaug recruits the CCR4/POP2/NOT deadenylase complex to trigger maternal transcript localization in the early Drosophila Embryo. Curr Biol 15:284–294. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2005.01.048
Tadros W, Goldman AL, Babak T et al (2007) SMAUG is a major regulator of maternal mRNA destabilization in Drosophila and its translation is activated by the PAN GU kinase. Dev Cell 12:143–155. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2006.10.005
Nelson MR, Leidal AM, Smibert CA (2004) Drosophila Cup is an eIF4E-binding protein that functions in Smaug-mediated translational repression. EMBO J 23:150–159. doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7600026
Pinder BD, Smibert CA (2013) microRNA-independent recruitment of Argonaute 1 to nanos mRNA through the Smaug RNA-binding protein. EMBO Rep 14:80–86. doi:10.1038/embor.2012.192
Chen L, Dumelie JG, Li X et al (2014) Global regulation of mRNA translation and stability in the early Drosophila embryo by the Smaug RNA-binding protein. Genome Biol 15:R4. doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-1-r4
Giraldez AJ, Cinalli RM, Glasner ME et al (2005) MicroRNAs regulate brain morphogenesis in zebrafish. Science 308:833–838. doi:10.1126/science.1109020
Bartel DP (2009) MicroRNAs: target recognition and regulatory functions. Cell 136:215–233. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.002
Sayed D, Abdellatif M (2011) MicroRNAs in development and disease. Physiol Rev 91:827–887. doi:10.1152/physrev.00006.2010
Marco A, Ninova M, Griffiths-Jones S (2013) Multiple products from microRNA transcripts. Biochem Soc Trans 41:850–854. doi:10.1042/BST20130035
Axtell MJ, Westholm JO, Lai EC (2011) Vive la différence: biogenesis and evolution of microRNAs in plants and animals. Genome Biol 12:221. doi:10.1186/gb-2011-12-4-221
Wienholds E, Koudijs MJ, van Eeden FJM et al (2003) The microRNA-producing enzyme Dicer1 is essential for zebrafish development. Nat Genet 35:217–218. doi:10.1038/ng1251
Giraldez AJ, Mishima Y, Rihel J et al (2006) Zebrafish MiR-430 promotes deadenylation and clearance of maternal mRNAs. Science 312:75–79. doi:10.1126/science.1122689
Lund E, Liu M, Hartley RS et al (2009) Deadenylation of maternal mRNAs mediated by miR-427 in Xenopus laevis embryos. RNA 15:2351–2363. doi:10.1261/rna.1882009
Bushati N, Stark A, Brennecke J, Cohen SM (2008) Temporal reciprocity of miRNAs and their targets during the maternal-to-zygotic transition in Drosophila. Curr Biol 18:501–506. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2008.02.081
Benoit B, He CH, Zhang F et al (2009) An essential role for the RNA-binding protein Smaug during the Drosophila maternal-to-zygotic transition. Development 136:923–932. doi:10.1242/dev.031815
Renzis SD, Elemento O, Tavazoie S, Wieschaus EF (2007) Unmasking activation of the zygotic genome using chromosomal deletions in the Drosophila Embryo. PLoS Biol 5:e117. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050117
Lee MT, Bonneau AR, Giraldez AJ (2014) Zygotic genome activation during the maternal-to-zygotic transition. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 30:581–613. doi:10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100913-013027
Thomsen S, Anders S, Janga SC et al (2010) Genome-wide analysis of mRNA decay patterns during early Drosophila development. Genome Biol 11:R93. doi:10.1186/gb-2010-11-9-r93
Marco A (2015) Selection against maternal microRNA target sites in maternal transcripts. G3 5:2199–2207. doi:10.1534/g3.115.019497
Kugler J-M, Chen Y-W, Weng R, Cohen SM (2013) Maternal loss of miRNAs leads to increased variance in primordial germ cell numbers in Drosophila melanogaster. G3 3:1573–1576. doi: 10.1534/g3.113.007591
Wu E, Thivierge C, Flamand M et al (2010) Pervasive and cooperative deadenylation of 3′UTRs by embryonic MicroRNA families. Mol Cell 40:558–570. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2010.11.003
Lee M, Choi Y, Kim K et al (2014) Adenylation of maternally inherited microRNAs by wispy. Mol Cell 56:696–707. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2014.10.011
Elliott D (2011) Molecular biology of RNA. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Oberstrass FC, Lee A, Stefl R et al (2006) Shape-specific recognition in the structure of the Vts1p SAM domain with RNA. Nat Struct Mol Biol 13:160–167. doi:10.1038/nsmb1038
Hofacker IL (2003) Vienna RNA secondary structure server. Nucleic Acids Res 31:3429–3431
Zuker M (2003) Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction. Nucleic Acids Res 31:3406–3415
Foat BC, Stormo GD (2009) Discovering structural cis-regulatory elements by modeling the behaviors of mRNAs. Mol Syst Biol 5:268. doi:10.1038/msb.2009.24
Marco A (2017) seedVicious: a versatile microRNA target site prediction tool with evolutionary applications. http://seedvicious.essex.ac.uk/
van Dongen S, Abreu-Goodger C, Enright A (2008) Detecting microRNA binding and siRNA off-target effects from expression data. Nat Methods 5(1025):1023
Alexiou P, Maragkakis M, Papadopoulos GL et al (2009) Lost in translation: an assessment and perspective for computational microRNA target identification. Bioinformatics 25(23):3049–3055. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp565
Giraldez AJ (2010) microRNAs, the cell’s Nepenthe: clearing the past during the maternal-to-zygotic transition and cellular reprogramming. Curr Opin Genet Dev 20:369–375. doi:10.1016/j.gde.2010.04.003
Lorenz R, Bernhart SH, Höner zu Siederdissen C et al (2011) ViennaRNA package 2.0. Algorithms. Mol Biol 6:26. doi:10.1186/1748-7188-6-26
Paz I, Kosti I, Ares M et al (2014) RBPmap: a web server for mapping binding sites of RNA-binding proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 42:W361–W367. doi:10.1093/nar/gku406
Kazan H, Ray D, Chan ET et al (2010) RNAcontext: a new method for learning the sequence and structure binding preferences of RNA-binding proteins. PLoS Comput Biol 6:e1000832. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000832
Hiller M, Pudimat R, Busch A, Backofen R (2006) Using RNA secondary structures to guide sequence motif finding towards single-stranded regions. Nucleic Acids Res 34:e117. doi:10.1093/nar/gkl544
Agarwal V, Bell GW, Nam J-W, Bartel DP (2015) Predicting effective microRNA target sites in mammalian mRNAs. Elife. doi:10.7554/eLife.05005
Enright A, John B, Gaul U et al (2003) MicroRNA targets in Drosophila. Genome Biol 5:R1. doi:10.1186/gb-2003-5-1-r1
Kruger J, Rehmsmeier M (2006) RNAhybrid: microRNA target prediction easy, fast and flexible. Nucleic Acids Res 34:W451–W454. doi:10.1093/nar/gkl243
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media LLC
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Marco, A. (2017). Clearance of Maternal RNAs: Not a Mummy’s Embryo Anymore. In: Lee, K. (eds) Zygotic Genome Activation. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1605. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6988-3_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6988-3_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-6986-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-6988-3
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols