Skip to main content

3D-Printing Composite Polycaprolactone-Decellularized Bone Matrix Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Decellularized Scaffolds and Organogenesis

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 1577))

Abstract

Millions of patients worldwide require bone grafts for treatment of large, critically sized bone defects from conditions such as trauma, cancer, and congenital defects. Tissue engineered (TE) bone grafts have the potential to provide a more effective treatment than current bone grafts since they would restore fully functional bone tissue in large defects. Most bone TE approaches involve a combination of stem cells with porous, biodegradable scaffolds that provide mechanical support and degrade gradually as bone tissue is regenerated by stem cells. 3D-printing is a key technique in bone TE that can be used to fabricate functionalized scaffolds with patient-specific geometry. Using 3D-printing, composite polycaprolactone (PCL) and decellularized bone matrix (DCB) scaffolds can be produced to have the desired mechanical properties, geometry, and osteoinductivity needed for a TE bone graft. This book chapter will describe the protocols for fabricating and characterizing 3D-printed PCL:DCB scaffolds. Moreover, procedures for culturing adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) in these scaffolds in vitro will be described to demonstrate the osteoinductivity of the scaffolds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Elder M (2014) Advanced orthopedic technologies, implants and regenerative products. BCC Research, Wellesley, MA

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gainer K (2015) Regenerative medicines: bone and joint applications. BCC Research, Wellesley, MA

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bose S, Roy M, Bandyopadhyay A (2012) Recent advances in bone tissue engineering scaffolds. Trends Biotechnol 30:546–554

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Stevens MM (2008) Biomaterials for bone tissue engineering. Mater Today 11:18–25

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu X, Ma PX (2004) Polymeric scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Ann Biomed Eng 32:477–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Temple JP, Hutton DL, Hung BP et al (2014) Engineering anatomically shaped vascularized bone grafts with hASCs and 3D-printed PCL scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res A 102:4317–4325

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Williams JM, Adewunmi A, Schek RM et al (2005) Bone tissue engineering using polycaprolactone scaffolds fabricated via selective laser sintering. Biomaterials 26:4817–4827

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Shor L, Güçeri S, Wen X et al (2007) Fabrication of three-dimensional polycaprolactone/hydroxyapatite tissue scaffolds and osteoblast-scaffold interactions in vitro. Biomaterials 28:5291–5297

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Woodruff MA, Hutmacher DW (2010) The return of a forgotten polymer—polycaprolactone in the 21st century. Prog Polym Sci 35:1217–1256

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. García-Gareta E, Coathup MJ, Blunn GW (2015) Osteoinduction of bone grafting materials for bone repair and regeneration. Bone 81:112–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hung BP, Naved BA, Nyberg EL et al (2016) Three-dimensional printing of bone extracellular matrix for craniofacial regeneration. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 2(10):1806

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Penel G, Delfosse C, Descamps M et al (2005) Composition of bone and apatitic biomaterials as revealed by intravital Raman microspectroscopy. Bone 36:893–901

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Benders KEM, van Weeren PR, Badylak SF et al (2013) Extracellular matrix scaffolds for cartilage and bone regeneration. Trends Biotechnol 31:169–176

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Datta N, Holtorf HL, Sikavitsas VI et al (2005) Effect of bone extracellular matrix synthesized in vitro on the osteoblastic differentiation of marrow stromal cells. Biomaterials 26:971–977

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nyberg E, Rindone A, Dorafshar A et al (2016) Comparison of 3D-printed poly-ε-caprolactone scaffolds functionalized with tricalcium phosphate, hydroxyapatite, bio-Oss, or decellularized bone matrix. Tissue Eng Part A. doi:10.1089/ten.TEA.2016.0418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Crapo PM, Gilbert TW, Badylak SF (2011) An overview of tissue and whole organ decellularization processes. Biomaterials 32:3233–3243

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Warren L. Grayson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Rindone, A.N., Nyberg, E., Grayson, W.L. (2017). 3D-Printing Composite Polycaprolactone-Decellularized Bone Matrix Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications. In: Turksen, K. (eds) Decellularized Scaffolds and Organogenesis. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1577. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/7651_2017_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/7651_2017_37

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-7655-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-7656-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics