Skip to main content

Validation of Alternative Tests for Developmental and Reproductive Toxicology Testing: An ILSI Health and Environmental Sciences Institute Perspective

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Teratogenicity Testing

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 947))

  • 3332 Accesses

Abstract

The current political and societal climate is driving the science of toxicology towards developing non-animal testing methodologies. Though alternative and in vitro tests have always been a mainstay for toxicological testing, technological advances in the last decade have allowed toxicologists to move rapidly towards a better understanding of the relevance of in vitro endpoints for traditional apical endpoints. Non-animal research using new technologies have illuminated toxicologists on the mechanisms of protection and adverse health outcomes. In this context, the “validation” of alternative and in vitro tests has taken on significant importance, particularly in regard to satisfying safety concerns of drugs and chemicals in a regulatory setting. The purpose of this chapter is to briefly review the impetus for the development of alternative and in vitro tests, discuss the projects underway at the ILSI Health and Environmental Sciences Institute (HESI) that are oriented towards this topic, and summarize the processes for formal validation. It should be noted that though there are validated assays and tests, these are under constant evaluation by scientific researchers as our understanding of the underlying biological processes continues to evolve.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/sectors/cosmetics/animal-testing/index_en.htm. Accessed 26 Aug 2011

  2. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/chemicals/reach/reach_intro.htm. Accessed 26 Aug 2011

  3. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/chemicals/reach/pdf/reach_animal_testing.pdf. Accessed 26 Aug 2011

  4. Scialli AR (2008) The challenge of reproductive and developmental toxicology under REACH. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 51:244–250

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. http://www.reprotect.eu/. Accessed 28 Sept 2011

  6. http://www.acutetox.eu/. Accessed 28 Sept 2011

  7. National Research Council (U.S.). Committee on Toxicity Testing and Assessment of Environmental Agents (2007) Toxicity testing in the 21st century: a vision and a strategy. National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  8. http://www.epa.gov/ncct/toxcast/. Accessed 26 Aug 2011

  9. http://www.epa.gov/ncct/Tox21/. Accessed 26 Aug 2011

  10. ICCVAM (2003) ICCVAM guidelines for the nomination and submission of new, revised, and alternative test methods. http://iccvam.niehs.nih.gov/SuppDocs/SubGuidelines/SD_subg034508.pdf. Accessed 28 Sept 2011

  11. Balls M, Blaauboer B, Brusick D, Frazier J, Lamb D, Pemberton M, Reinhardt C, Roberfroid M, Rosenkranz H, Schmid B, Spielmann H, Stammati A-L, Walum E (1990) Report and recommendations of the CAAT/ERGATT workshop on the validation of toxicity test procedures. Altern Lab Anim 18:313–337

    Google Scholar 

  12. Smith LL, Brent RL, Cohen SM, Doerrer NG, Goodman JI, Greim H, Holsapple MP, Lightfoot RM (2008) Predicting future human and environmental health challenges: the Health and Environmental Sciences Institute’s scientific mapping exercise. Crit Rev Toxicol 38:817–845

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bonnefoi MS, Belanger SE, Devlin DJ, Doerrer NG, Embry MR, Fukushima S, Harpur ES, Hines RN, Holsapple MP, Kim JH, MacDonald JS, O’Lone R, Pettit SD, Stevens JL, Takei AS, Tinkle SS, van der Laan JW (2010) Human and environmental health challenges for the next decade (2010–2020). Crit Rev Toxicol 40:893–911

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chapin R, Augustine-Rauch K, Beyer B, Daston G, Finnell R, Flynn T, Hunter S, Mirkes P, O’Shea KS, Piersma A, Sandler D, Vanparys P, Van Maele-Fabry G (2008) State of the art in developmental toxicity screening methods and a way forward: a meeting report addressing embryonic stem cells, whole embryo culture, and zebrafish. Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol 83:446–456

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ito T, Ando H, Suzuki T, Ogura T, Hotta K, Imamura Y, Yamaguchi Y, Handa H (2010) Identification of a primary target of thalidomide teratogenicity. Science 327:1345–1349

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Shuey D, Kim JH (2011) Overview: developmental toxicology-new directions. Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol 92(5):381–383. doi:10.1002/bdrb.20312

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Makris SL, Kim JH, Ellis A, Faber W, Harrouk W, Lewis JM, Paule MG, Seed J, Tassinari M, Tyl R (2011) Current and future needs for developmental toxicity testing. Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol 92(5):384–394. doi:10.1002/bdrb.20335

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Carney EW, Ellis AL, Tyl RW, Foster PM, Scialli AR, Thompson K, Kim J (2011) Critical evaluation of current developmental toxicity testing strategies: a case of babies and their bathwater. Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol 92(5):395–403. doi:10.1002/bdrb.20318

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Brannen K, Fenton SE, Hansen DK, Harrouk W, Kim JH, Shuey D (2011) Developmental toxicology: new directions workshop: refining testing strategies and study designs. Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol 92(5):404–412. doi:10.1002/bdrb.20326

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Knudsen TB, Kavlock RJ, Daston GP, Stedman D, Hixon M, Kim JH (2011) Developmental toxicity testing for safety assessment: new approaches and technologies. Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol 92(5):413–420. doi:10.1002/bdrb.20315

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sasaki J, Chapin R, Hall D, Breslin W, Moffit J, Saldutti L, Enright B, Seger M, Jarvi K, Hixon M, Mitchard T, Kim JH (2011) Incidence and nature of testicular toxicity findings in pharmaceutical development. Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol 92(6):511–525. doi:10.1002/bdrb.20338

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Smith MK, Kimmel GL, Kochhar DM, Shepard TH, Spielberg SP, Wilson JG (1983) A selection of candidate compounds for in vitro teratogenesis test validation. Teratog Carcinog Mutagen 3:461–480

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Schwetz BA (1992) Criteria for judging the relative toxicity of chemicals from developmental toxicity data: a workshop summary. Teratology 45:337–339

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Brown NA (2002) Selection of test chemicals for the ECVAM international validation study on in vitro embryotoxicity tests. European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods. Altern Lab Anim 30:177–198

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Genschow E, Spielmann H, Scholz G, Seiler A, Brown N, Piersma A, Brady M, Clemann N, Huuskonen H, Paillard F, Bremer S, Becker K (2002) The ECVAM international validation study on in vitro embryotoxicity tests: results of the definitive phase and evaluation of prediction models. European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods. Altern Lab Anim 30:151–176

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Marx-Stoelting P, Adriaens E, Ahr HJ, Bremer S, Garthoff B, Gelbke HP, Piersma A, Pellizzer C, Reuter U, Rogiers V, Schenk B, Schwengberg S, Seiler A, Spielmann H, Steemans M, Stedman DB, Vanparys P, Vericat JA, Verwei M, van der Water F, Weimer M, Schwarz M (2009) A review of the implementation of the embryonic stem cell test (EST). The report and recommendations of an ECVAM/ReProTect workshop. Altern Lab Anim 37:313–328

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Daston GP, Chapin RE, Scialli AR, Piersma AH, Carney EW, Rogers JM, Friedman JM (2010) A different approach to validating screening assays for developmental toxicity. Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol 89:526–530

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. http://ecvam.jrc.it/. Accessed 26 Aug 2011

  29. Hartung T, Bremer S, Casati S, Coecke S, Corvi R, Fortaner S, Gribaldo L, Halder M, Hoffmann S, Roi AJ, Prieto P, Sabbioni E, Scott L, Worth A, Zuang V (2004) A modular approach to the ECVAM principles on test validity. Altern Lab Anim 32:467–472

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. http://iccvam.niehs.nih.gov/. Accessed 26 Aug 2011

  31. http://iccvam.niehs.nih.gov/methods/development/dev.htm. Accessed 28 Sept 2011

  32. http://jacvam.jp/en/. Accessed 26 Aug 2011

  33. http://sc.bcrc.cn/col/1253668419437/1303811031404.html. Accessed 26 Aug 2011

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James H. Kim .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Kim, J.H. (2013). Validation of Alternative Tests for Developmental and Reproductive Toxicology Testing: An ILSI Health and Environmental Sciences Institute Perspective. In: Barrow, P. (eds) Teratogenicity Testing. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 947. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-131-8_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-131-8_32

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-62703-130-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-62703-131-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics