Abstract
Investigation of protein–protein interactions in situ in living or intact cells gains expanding importance as structure/function relationships proposed from bulk biochemistry and molecular modeling experiments require demonstration at the cellular level. Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based methods are excellent tools for determining proximity and supramolecular organization of biomolecules at the cell surface or inside the cell. This could well be the basis for the increasing popularity of FRET; in fact, the number of publications exploiting FRET has doubled in the past 5 years. In this chapter, we intend to provide a generally useable protocol for measuring FRET in flow cytometry. After a concise theoretical introduction, recipes are provided for successful labeling techniques and measurement approaches. The simple, quenching-based population-level measurement; the classic ratiometric, intensity-based technique providing cell-by-cell actual FRET efficiencies, and a more advanced version of the latter, allowing for cell-by-cell autofluorescence correction, are described. Finally, points of caution are given to help design proper experiments and critically interpret the results.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Szöllősi, J., Damjanovich, S., and Mátyus, L. (1998) Application of fluorescence resonance energy transfer in the clinical laboratory: routine and research. Cytometry 34, 159–79.
Bastiaens, P. I. H. and Squire, A. (1999) Fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy: spatial resolution of biochemical processes in the cell. Trends Cell Biol 9, 48–52.
Clegg, R. M. (2002) FRET tells us about proximities, distances, orientations and dynamic properties. J Biotechnol 82, 177–9.
Vereb, G., Szöllősi, J., Matkó, J., et al. (2003) Dynamic, yet structured: the cell membrane three decades after the Singer-Nicolson model. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100, 8053–8.
Berney, C. and Danuser, G. (2003) FRET or No FRET: a quantitative comparison. Biophys J 84, 3992–4010.
Förster, T. (1946) Energiewanderung und Fluoreszenz. Naturwissenschaften 6, 166–75.
Stryer, L. and Haugland, R. P. (1967) Energy transfer: a spectroscopic ruler. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A 58, 719–26.
Dexter, D. L. (1953) A theory of sensitized luminescence in solids. J Chem Phys 21, 836–50.
Jares-Erijman, E. A. and Jovin, T. M. (2003) FRET imaging. Nat Biotechnol 21, 1387–95.
Szabó, A., Horváth, G., Szöllősi, J., and Nagy, P. (2008) Quantitative characterization of the large-scale association of ErbB1 and ErbB2 by flow cytometric homo-FRET measurements. Biophys J 95, 2086–96.
Horváth, G., Petrás, M., Szentesi, G., et al. (2005) Selecting the right fluorophores and flow cytometer for fluorescence resonance energy transfer measurements. Cytometry A 65, 148–57.
Sebestyén, Z., Nagy, P., Horváth, G., et al. (2002) Long wavelength fluorophores and cell-by-cell correction for autofluorescence significantly improves the accuracy of flow cytometric energy transfer measurements on a dual-laser benchtop flow cytometer. Cytometry 48, 124–35.
Szentesi, G., Horváth, G., Bori, I., et al. (2004) Computer program for determining fluorescence resonance energy transfer efficiency from flow cytometric data on a cell-by-cell basis. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 75, 201–11.
Szöllősi, J., Trón, L., Damjanovich, S., Helliwell, S. H., Arndt-Jovin, D., and Jovin, T. M. (1984) Fluorescence energy transfer measurements on cell surfaces: a critical comparison of steady-state fluorimetric and flow cytometric methods. Cytometry 5, 210–6.
Damjanovich, S., Trón, L., Szöllősi, J., et al. (1983) Distribution and mobility of murine histocompatibility H-2Kk antigen in the cytoplasmic membrane. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 80, 5985–9.
Trón, L., Szöllősi, J., Damjanovich, S., Helliwell, S. H., Arndt-Jovin, D. J., and Jovin, T. M. (1984) Flow cytometric measurement of fluorescence resonance energy transfer on cell surfaces. Quantitative evaluation of the transfer efficiency on a cell-by-cell basis. Biophys J 45, 939–46.
Nagy, P., Bene, L., Hyun, W. C., et al. (2005) Novel calibration method for flow cytometric fluorescence resonance energy transfer measurements between visible fluorescent proteins. Cytometry A 67, 86–96.
Dale, R. E., Eisinger, J., and Blumberg, W. E. (1979) The orientational freedom of molecular probes. The orientation factor in intramolecular energy transfer. Biophys J 26, 161–93.
Batard, P., Szöllősi, J., Luescher, I., Cerottini, J. C., MacDonald, R., and Romero, P. (2002) Use of phycoerythrin and allophycocyanin for fluorescence resonance energy transfer analyzed by flow cytometry: advantages and limitations. Cytometry 48, 97–105.
Wolber, P. K. and Hudson, B. S. (1979) An analytic solution to the Forster energy transfer problem in two dimensions. Biophys J 28, 197–210.
Dewey, T. G. and Hammes, G. G. (1980) Calculation on fluorescence resonance energy transfer on surfaces. Biophys J 32, 1023–35.
Snyder, B. and Freire, E. (1982) Fluorescence energy transfer in two dimensions. A numeric solution for random and nonrandom distributions. Biophys J 40, 137–48.
Szöllősi, J., Damjanovich, S., Balázs, M., et al. (1989) Physical association between MHC class I and class II molecules detected on the cell surface by flow cytometric energy transfer. J Immunol 143, 208–13.
Kenworthy, A. K. and Edidin, M. (1998) Distribution of a glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored protein at the apical surface of MDCK cells examined at a resolution of <100 A using imaging fluorescence resonance energy transfer. J Cell Biol 142, 69–84.
Shaner, N. C., Steinbach, P. A., and Tsien, R. Y. (2005) A guide to choosing fluorescent proteins. Nat Methods 2, 905–9.
Patterson, G. H., Piston, D. W., and Barisas, B. G. (2000) Forster distances between green fluorescent protein pairs. Anal Biochem 284, 438–40.
Ai, H. W., Hazelwood, K. L., Davidson, M. W., and Campbell, R. E. (2008) Fluorescent protein FRET pairs for ratiometric imaging of dual biosensors. Nat Methods 5, 401–3.
Shcherbo, D., Souslova, E. A., Goedhart, J., et al. (2009) Practical and reliable FRET/FLIM pair of fluorescent proteins. BMC Biotechnol 9, 24.
Sun, Y., Booker, C. F., Kumari, S., Day, R. N., Davidson, M., and Periasamy, A. (2009) Characterization of an orange acceptor fluorescent protein for sensitized spectral fluorescence resonance energy transfer microscopy using a white-light laser. J Biomed Opt 14, 054009.
Acknowledgments
The authors were supported by the following grants: EU FP6 LSHBCT-2004-503467, LSHC-CT-2005-018914, MRTN-CT-2005-019481, and MCRTB-CT-035946; Hungarian National Research Fund K62648, K75752, K68763, K72677; Hungarian National Development Agency TAMOP-4.2.2-08/1-2008-0019 and TAMOP-4.2.11B-09/11KONV-2010-0007; and Hungarian Ministry of Health ETT 362/2009.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Vereb, G., Nagy, P., Szöllo˝si, J. (2011). Flow Cytometric FRET Analysis of Protein Interaction. In: Hawley, T., Hawley, R. (eds) Flow Cytometry Protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 699. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61737-950-5_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61737-950-5_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press
Print ISBN: 978-1-61737-949-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-61737-950-5
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols