Skip to main content
Log in

Some comments on Antonelli and Quatraro’s paper of measuring effect of biased technology on TFP

  • Published:
The Journal of Technology Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper is a response to Antonelli and Quatraro’s paper named “The effects of biased technological change on total factor productivity: empirical evidence from a sample of OECD”. We point out that “so-called novel method” which is used to identify and disentangle the effects of the direction of technological change on total factor productivity (TFP) in the article is wrongly implemented. Antonelli and Quatraro introduce Solow’s methodology as part of his basic model to represent the effect of neutral technical change, ignoring the intrinsic consequence of Solow’s calculating which called technical progress productivity is far from neutral. Hence, his methodology has little significance, neither the empirical analysis. Lastly, we give a new method measuring whether the technology is appropriate to the factor endowments’ changing. That’s the effect of biased technology on TFP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antonelli, C. (2006a). Diffusion as a process of creative adoption. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, 211–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonelli, C. (2006b). Localized technological change and factor markets: Constraints and inducements to innovation. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 17, 224–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonelli, C., & Quatraro, F. (2010). The effects of biased technological change on total factor productivity: Empirical evidence from a sample of OECD countries. Journal of Technology Transfer, 35, 361–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diliberto, A., Pigliaru, F., & Mura, R. (2008). How to measure the unobservable: A panel technique for the analysis of TFP convergence. Oxford Economic Papers, 60, 343–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, 120, 253–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felipe, J., & McCombie, J. S. L. (2001). Biased technological change, growth accounting, and the conundrum of the East Asian miracle. Journal of Comparative Economics, 29, 542–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R. M. (1957). Technical change and the aggregate production function. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 39, 312–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yongbao Ji.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ji, Y., Wang, Y. Some comments on Antonelli and Quatraro’s paper of measuring effect of biased technology on TFP. J Technol Transf 39, 276–280 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-013-9310-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-013-9310-2

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation