Skip to main content
Log in

Das femoroacetabuläre Impingement

Stellenwert der manuellen Therapie und der operativen Versorgung

Femoroacetabular impingement

The importance of manual therapy and surgical treatment

  • Übersichten
  • Published:
Manuelle Medizin Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Das Krankheitsbild des femoroacetabulären Impingements (FAI) beschreibt das schmerzhafte Vorliegen zweier Knochendeformitäten, und zwar der Nockenwellen- („cam deformity“) und der Zangendeformität („pincer deformity“). Mithilfe der klinischen und radiologischen Untersuchung lassen sich intra- und extraartikuläre Differenzialdiagnosen voneinander abgrenzen. Wurde die Diagnose FAI gestellt, sollte primär eine konservative Therapie (einschließlich Manualtherapie, Faszientraining, myofasziale Techniken) eingeleitet werden. Nach fehlgeschlagener konservativer Therapie ist die Operation, meist in Form der Hüftarthroskopie, ein probates Mittel, die knöchernen Deformitäten zu korrigieren, Begleitverletzungen zu adressieren, Schmerzen zu reduzieren und die volle sportliche Belastbarkeit wiederherzustellen. Der vorliegende Beitrag erklärt das Grundprinzip des FAI und erläutert die diagnostischen sowie therapeutischen Maßnahmen.

Abstract

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) presents with hip pain in the presence of two bone deformities, namely the cam and pincer deformities. Physical and radiological examinations help to distinguish between intra- and extraarticular causes of hip pain. Upon diagnosis of FAI, conservative treatment (including manual therapy, fascia training, and myofascial techniques) should be initiated. In patients with failed conservative treatment, surgery—usually hip arthroscopy—produces excellent outcomes, with correction of bone deformities, treatment of concomitant injuries, pain reduction and restoration of full sporting capacity. This article explains the principles of FAI as well as the diagnostic and therapeutic options.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6
Abb. 7
Abb. 8
Abb. 9

Literatur

  1. Altenberg AR (1977) Acetabular labrum tears: a cause of hip pain and degenerative arthritis. South Med J 70:174–175

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson LA, Anderson MB, Kapron A et al (2016) The 2015 Frank Stinchfield award: radiographic abnormalities common in senior athletes with well-functioning hips but not associated with osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 474:342–352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Beck M, Kalhor M, Leunig M et al (2005) Hip morphology influences the pattern of damage to the acetabular cartilage: femoroacetabular impingement as a cause of early osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:1012–1018

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bohnsack M (2014) Impingement des Hüftgelenks – Differenzialdiagnosen. Arthroskopie 27:82–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Broadhurst NA, Bond MJ (1998) Pain provocation tests for the assessment of sacroiliac joint dysfunction. J Spinal Disord 11:341–345

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Burman MS (1931) Arthroscopy or the direct visualization of joints: an experimental cadaver study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 13:669–695

    Google Scholar 

  7. Byrd JW (2014) Femoroacetabular impingement in athletes: current concepts. Am J Sports Med 42:737–751

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Carano A, Siciliani G (1996) Effects of continuous and intermittent forces on human fibroblasts in vitro. Eur J Orthod 18:19–26

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Clohisy JC, Baca G, Beaule PE et al (2013) Descriptive epidemiology of femoroacetabular impingement: a North American cohort of patients undergoing surgery. Am J Sports Med 41:1348–1356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dietrich F, Ries C, Eiermann C et al (2014) Complications in hip arthroscopy: necessity of supervision during the learning curve. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:953–958

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Frank JM, Harris JD, Erickson BJ et al (2015) Prevalence of femoroacetabular impingement imaging findings in asymptomatic volunteers: a systematic review. Arthroscopy 31:1199–1204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fukushima K, Uchiyama K, Takahira N et al (2014) Prevalence of radiographic findings of femoroacetabular impingement in the Japanese population. J Orthop Surg Res 9:25

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Ganz R, Gill TJ, Gautier E et al (2001) Surgical dislocation of the adult hip a technique with full access to the femoral head and acetabulum without the risk of avascular necrosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:1119–1124

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ganz R, Leunig M, Leunig-Ganz K et al (2008) The etiology of osteoarthritis of the hip: an integrated mechanical concept. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:264–272

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Griffin DR, Dickenson EJ, O’donnell J et al (2016) The Warwick Agreement on femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAI syndrome): an international consensus statement. Br J Sports Med 50:1169–1176

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gupta A, Redmond JM, Stake CE et al (2016) Does primary hip arthroscopy result in improved clinical outcomes?: 2‑year clinical follow-up on a mixed group of 738 consecutive primary hip Arthroscopies performed at a high-volume referral center. Am J Sports Med 44:74–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hogervorst T, Eilander W, Fikkers JT et al (2012) Hip ontogenesis: how evolution, genes, and load history shape hip morphotype and cartilotype. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:3284–3296

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Klit J, Gosvig K, Magnussen E et al (2014) Cam deformity and hip degeneration are common after fixation of a slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Acta Orthop 85:585–591

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Laborie LB, Lehmann TG, Engesaeter IO et al (2011) Prevalence of radiographic findings thought to be associated with femoroacetabular impingement in a population-based cohort of 2081 healthy young adults. Radiology 260:494–502

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lavigne M, Parvizi J, Beck M et al (2004) Anterior femoroacetabular impingement: part I. Techniques of joint preserving surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004(418):61–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Leunig M, Williams JR, Ganz R (2007) Operative techniques. Sports Med 15:178–188

    Google Scholar 

  22. Leunig M, Ganz R (2009) FAI – concept and etiology. Orthopäde 38:394–401

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Martin HD, Khoury A, Schroder R et al (2016) Ischiofemoral impingement and hamstring syndrome as causes of posterior hip pain: where do we go next? Clin Sports Med 35:469–486

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Martin HD, Palmer IJ (2013) History and physical examination of the hip: the basics. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 6:219–225

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Mathew G, Kowalczuk M, Hetaimish B et al (2014) Radiographic prevalence of CAM-type femoroacetabular impingement after open reduction and internal fixation of femoral neck fractures. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:793–800

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Myers TW (2015) Anatomy Trains – Myofasziale Leitbahnen (für Manual- und Bewegungstherapeuten). Urban & Fischer, Elsevier, München

    Google Scholar 

  27. Naal FD, Schar M, Miozzari HH et al (2014) Sports and activity levels after open surgical treatment of femoroacetabular impingement. Am J Sports Med 42:1690–1695

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Nepple JJ, Vigdorchik JM, Clohisy JC (2015) What is the association between sports participation and the development of proximal femoral cam deformity? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 43:2833–2840

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Pfirrmann CW, Mengiardi B, Dora C et al (2006) Cam and pincer femoroacetabular impingement: characteristic MR arthrographic findings in 50 patients. Radiology 240:778–785

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pollard TC, Villar RN, Norton MR et al (2010) Genetic influences in the aetiology of femoroacetabular impingement: a sibling study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92:209–216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Reiman MP, Goode AP, Hegedus EJ et al (2013) Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests of the hip: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med 47:893–902

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Sankar WN, Matheney TH, Zaltz I (2013) Femoroacetabular impingement: current concepts and controversies. Orthop Clin North Am 44:575–589

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Smith TO, Hilton G, Toms AP et al (2011) The diagnostic accuracy of acetabular labral tears using magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance arthrography: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 21:863–874

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Smith TO, Simpson M, Ejindu V et al (2013) The diagnostic test accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance arthrography and computer tomography in the detection of chondral lesions of the hip. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 23:335–344

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sobau C, Zimmerer A (2017) Klinische Untersuchung des Hüftgelenks und angrenzende Gelenke. In: Sobau C, Möckel G, Gollwitzer H (Hrsg) Hüftarthroskopie: Praxisbuch gelenkerhaltende Chirurgie. Schattauer, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sutter R, Pfirrmann CW (2013) Atypical hip impingement. AJR Am J Roentgenol 201:W437–W442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Tibor LM, Leunig M (2012) The pathoanatomy and arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement. Bone Joint Res 1:245–257

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Wall PD, Fernandez M, Griffin DR et al (2013) Nonoperative treatment for femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review of the literature. PM R 5:418–426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. M. Schneider.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

M.M. Schneider, A. Mohr, G. Reith, A. Zimmerer, W. Miehlke und C. Sobau geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine von den Autoren durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren. Alle Patienten, die über Bildmaterial oder anderweitige Angaben innerhalb des Manuskripts zu identifizieren sind, haben hierzu ihre schriftliche Einwilligung gegeben.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schneider, M.M., Mohr, A., Reith, G. et al. Das femoroacetabuläre Impingement. Manuelle Medizin 55, 254–264 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00337-017-0305-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00337-017-0305-1

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation