1. Competition for the Effectiveness of Big Data Benefits

   • Vicente Bagnoli

   Editorial 01 September 2015 Pages: 629 - 631

2. The Blocking Injunction – A Critical Review of Its Implementation in the United Kingdom Within the Legal Framework of the European Union

   • Althaf Marsoof

   Article 01 September 2015 Pages: 632 - 664

3. The Efficiency of India's Patent Layering Regime – Section 3(d) from Scientific Terminology to Patenting Implications

   • Jenny Bergström

   Article 04 September 2015 Pages: 665 - 681

4. Beyond Economic Considerations: (Re)Conceptualizing Geographical Indications for Protecting Traditional Agricultural Products

   • Tesh W. Dagne

   Article 01 September 2015 Pages: 682 - 706

5. Position Paper of the Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition

   • Reto M. Hilty
   • Kaya Köklü
   • Silke von Lewinski

   Opinion 10 September 2015 Pages: 707 - 716

6. “Access Rights” (Zugriffsrechte)

   • European Patent Convention, Arts. 56, 69; Patent Act, Secs. 4, 14

   Decision • Patent Law 02 September 2015 Pages: 717 - 717

7. “Seat Numbering System” (Sitzplatznummerierungseinrichtung)

   • Patent Act, Sec. 100(3), No. 3

   Decision • Patent Law 01 September 2015 Pages: 718 - 718

8. “Crimping Pliers” (Presszange)

   • European Patent Convention, Art. 54(2); Patent Act, Sec. 3(1)

   Decision • Patent Law 01 September 2015 Pages: 719 - 719

9. “Quetiapin”

   • European Patent Convention, Art. 52(1); Patent Act, Sec. 1(1)

   Decision • Patent Law 01 September 2015 Pages: 720 - 720

10. “Cooking Pan” (Kochgefäß)

    • European Patent Convention, Art. 69; Patent Act, Sec. 14; International Patent Conventions Act, Art. II Sec. 3 (in the wording of 20 December 1991)

    Decision • Patent Law 04 September 2015 Pages: 721 - 726

11. “Commil v. Cisco Systems”

    • Commil v. Cisco Systems 35 U.S.C. § 271(b)

    Decision • Patent Law 04 September 2015 Pages: 727 - 728

12. “Tank Man II”

    • Copyright Act (2003), Secs. 5(7), 7, 17, 35, 56(d); Copyright Act (1965), Secs. 2(1) and (2); InfoSoc Directive, Arts. 2, 5(e), 5(d); Enforcement Directive, Art. 8; Copyright Term Directive, Art. 6; Constitution of the Slovak Republic, Arts. 20, 26, 43; European Convention on Human Rights, Art. 10

    Decision • Copyright Law 03 September 2015 Pages: 729 - 734

13. “TOP Logistics and others”

    • TOP Logistics BV, Van Caem International BV v. Bacardi & Company Ltd, Bacardi International Ltd, and Bacardi & Company Ltd, Bacardi International Ltd v. TOP Logistics BV, Van Caem International BV Directive 89/104/EEC, Art. 5

    Decision • Trade Mark Law 01 September 2015 Pages: 735 - 735

14. “Converse III”

    • Royer Sport SAS, Converse/Ne. (Etats-Unis) et All Star CV v. Auchan France SA, Sport Concept SAS, Cbs Diffusion et al. Trade Mark Act; Code of Civil Procedure, Art. 700

    Decision • Trade Mark Law 08 September 2015 Pages: 736 - 739

15. Comment on “International Stem Cell”: The EU Court of Justice Revisits the Patentability of Processes for the Production of Human Stem Cells – The Decision in International Stem Cell Corporation

    • Paolo Stazi

    Case Note 07 September 2015 Pages: 740 - 748

16. Jacques de Werra (ed.): Research Handbook on Intellectual Property Licensing (Research Handbooks in Intellectual Property Series)

    • Thomas Adam

    Book Review 25 August 2015 Pages: 749 - 753