Skip to main content

A Synthesis of Research and Practice on Restoring Tides to Salt Marshes

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: The Science and Practice of Ecological Restoration ((SPER))

Abstract

The structure and ecological function of salt marshes are defined by many interacting factors, including salinity, substrate, nutrient and oxygen availability, sediment supply, and climate, but hydrology (the frequency and duration of tidal flooding) is a dominating factor (e.g., Chapman 1960; Ranwell 1972; Daiber 1986). When tidal flow is restricted there can be dramatic changes to physical and biological processes that affect vegetation patterns, fish and avian communities, and biogeochemical cycling, among others. Throughout the developed coastal zone, roads and railroads that cross salt marshes often have inadequately sized bridges and culverts that restrict tides (fig. 1.1). Tide gates are also a common feature, eliminating or dramatically restricting flood tides from entering salt marshes but allowing for some drainage on the ebb tide. Other tide-restricting practices that have been ongoing for centuries include impoundments for wildlife management purposes (Montague et al. 1987) and diking and draining to facilitate grazing and agriculture (Daiber 1986; Doody 2008). Diking is particularly extensive in Atlantic Canada (Ganong 1903), Europe (Davy et al. 2009), and the United States (e.g., Delaware Bay, Sebold 1992; San Francisco Bay, Nichols et al. 1986).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Able, K. W., and S. M. Hagan. 2000. “Effects of Common Reed (Phragmites australis) Invasion on Marsh Surface Macrofauna: Response of Fishes and Decapod Crustaceans.” Estuaries 23:633–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Able, K. W., S. M. Hagan, and S. A. Brown. 2003. “Mechanisms of Marsh Habitat Alteration due to Phragmites: Response of Young-of-the-Year Mummichog (Fundulus heteroclitus) to Treatment for Phragmites Removal.” Estuaries 26:484–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anisfeld, S. C., and G. Benoit. 1997. “Impacts of Flow Restrictions on Salt Marshes: An Instance of Acidification.” Environmental Science and Technology 31:1650–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Benoit, L. K., and R. A. Askins. 1999. “Impact of the Spread of Phragmites on the Distribution of Birds in Connecticut Tidal Marshes.” Wetlands 19:194–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bromberg, K. D., and M. D. Bertness. 2005. “Reconstructing New England Salt Marsh Losses Using Historical Maps.” Estuaries 28:823–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burdick, D. M., M. Dionne, R. M. Boumans, and F. T. Short. 1997. “Ecological Responses to Tidal Restorations of Two Northern New England Salt Marshes.” Wetlands Ecology and Management 4:129–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byers, S. E., and G. L. Chmura. 2007. “Salt Marsh Vegetation Recovery on the Bay of Fundy.” Estuaries and Coasts 30:869–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callaway, J. C., and J. B. Zedler. 2004. “Restoration of Urban Salt Marshes: Lessons from Southern California.” Urban Ecosystems 7:107–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, V. J. 1960. Salt Marshes and Salt Deserts of the World. New York: Interscience Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crain, C. M., K. B. Gedan, and M. Dionne. 2009. “Tidal Restrictions and Mosquito Ditching in New England Marshes.” Pp. 149–69 in Human Impacts on Salt Marshes: A Global Perspective, edited by B. R. Silliman, E. D. Grosholz, and M. D. Bertness. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daiber, F. C. 1986. Conservation of Tidal Marshes. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davy, A. J., J. P. Bakker, and M. E. Figueroa. 2009. “Human Modification of European Salt Marshes.” Pp. 311–35 in Human Impacts on Salt Marshes: A Global Perspective, edited by B. R. Silliman, E. D. Grosholz, and M. D. Bertness. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dionne, M., F. T. Short, and D. M. Burdick. 1999. “Fish Utilization of Restored, Created, and Reference Salt-Marsh Habitat in the Gulf of Maine.” Pp. 384–404 in Fish Habitat: Essential Fish Habitat and Rehabilitation, edited by L. R. Benaka. American Fisheries Society Symposium 22. Bethesda, MD: American Fisheries Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiQuinzio, D. A., P. W. C. Paton, and W. R. Eddleman. 2002. “Nesting Ecology of Salt-marsh Sharp-Tailed Sparrows in a Tidally Restricted Salt Marsh.” Wetlands 22:179–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doody, J. P. 2008. Saltmarsh Conservation, Management and Restoration. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ganong, W. F. 1903. “The Vegetation of the Bay of Fundy Salt and Diked Marshes: An Ecological Study.” Botanical Gazette 36:161–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gedan, K. B., and B. R. Silliman. 2009. “Patterns of Salt Marsh Loss within Coastal Regions of North America.” Pp. 253–65 in Human Impacts on Salt Marshes: A Global Perspective, edited by B. R. Silliman, E. D. Grosholz, and M. D. Bertness. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, K. L., D. A. Fox, L. M. Brown, and K. W. Able. 2006. “Responses of Resident Marsh Fishes to Stages of Phragmites australis Invasion in Three Mid-Atlantic Estuaries.” Estuaries and Coasts 29:487–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montague, C. L., A. V. Zale, and H. F. Percival. 1987. “Ecological Effects of Coastal Marsh Impoundments: A Review.” Environmental Management 11:743–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, F. H., J. E. Cloern, S. N. Luoma, and D. H. Peterson. 1986. “The Modification of an Estuary.” Science 231:567–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • NOAA Restoration Center and NOAA Coastal Services Center. 2010. Returning the Tide: A Tidal Hydrology Restoration Guidance Manual for the Southeastern United States. Silver Spring, MD: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pethick, J. 2002. “Estuarine and Tidal Wetland Restoration in the United Kingdom: Policy versus Practice.” Restoration Ecology 10:431–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philipp, K. R. 2005. “History of Delaware and New Jersey Salt Marsh Restoration Sites.” Ecological Engineering 25:214–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portnoy, J. W. 1991. “Summer Oxygen Depletion in a Diked New England Estuary.” Estuaries 14:122–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Portnoy, J. W. 1999. “Salt Marsh Diking and Restoration: Biogeochemical Implications of Altered Wetland Hydrology.” Environmental Management 24:111–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranwell, D. S. 1972. Ecology of Salt Marshes and Sand Dunes. London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raposa, K. B., and C. T. Roman. 2003. “Using Gradients in Tidal Restriction to Evaluate Nekton Community Responses to Salt Marsh Restoration.” Estuaries 26:98–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roman, C. T., W. A. Niering, and R. S. Warren. 1984. “Salt Marsh Vegetation Response to Tidal Restriction.” Environmental Management 8:141–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sebold, K. R. 1992. From Marsh to Farm: The Landscape Transformation of Coastal New Jersey. Washington, DC: US Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Cultural Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thom, R. M., R. Zeigler, and A. B. Borde. 2002. “Floristic Development Patterns in a Restored Elk River Estuarine Marsh, Grays Harbor, Washington.” Restoration Ecology 10:487–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomsen, M. S., P. Adam, and B. R. Silliman. 2009. “Anthropogenic Threats to Australasian Coastal Salt Marshes.” Pp. 361–90 in Human Impacts on Salt Marshes: A Global Perspective, edited by B. R. Silliman, E. D. Grosholz, and M. D. Bertness. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, R. S., P. E. Fell, R. Rozsa, A. H. Brawley, A. C. Orsted, E. T. Olson, V. Swamy, and W. A. Niering. 2002. “Salt Marsh Restoration in Connecticut: 20 Years of Science and Management.” Restoration Ecology 10:497–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, M. P., J. H. Balletto, J. M. Teal, and D. F. Ludwig. 1997. “Success Criteria and Adaptive Management for a Large-Scale Wetland Restoration Project.” Wetlands Ecology and Management 4:111–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P., and P. Faber. 2001. “Salt Marsh Restoration Experience in San Francisco Bay.” Special issue, Journal of Coastal Research 27:203–11.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P. B., and M. K. Orr. 2002. “Physical Evolution of Restored Breached Levee Salt Marshes in the San Francisco Bay Estuary.” Restoration Ecology 10:527–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. J., and F. A. Watford. 1996. “An Inventory of Impediments to Tidal Flow in NSW Estuarine Fisheries Habitats.” Wetlands (Australia) 15:44–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolters, M., A. Garbutt, and J. P. Bakker. 2005. “Salt-Marsh Restoration: Evaluating the Success of De-embankments in North-west Europe.” Biological Conservation 123:249–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wozniak, A. S., C. T. Roman, S. C. Wainright, R. A. McKinney, and M. J. James-Pirri. 2006. “Monitoring Food Web Changes in Tide-Restored Salt Marshes: A Carbon Stable Isotope Approach.” Estuaries and Coasts 29:568–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zedler, J. B., ed. 2001. Handbook for Restoring Tidal Wetlands. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Island Press

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Roman, C.T., Burdick, D.M. (2012). A Synthesis of Research and Practice on Restoring Tides to Salt Marshes. In: Roman, C.T., Burdick, D.M. (eds) Tidal Marsh Restoration. The Science and Practice of Ecological Restoration. Island Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-229-7_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics