Abstract
In this article, we present MLP, a MATLAB toolbox enabling auditory thresholds estimation via the adaptive maximum likelihood procedure proposed by David Green (1990, 1993). This adaptive procedure is particularly appealing for those psychologists who need to estimate thresholds with a good degree of accuracy and in a short time. Together with a description of the toolbox, the present text provides an introduction to the threshold estimation theory and a theoretical explanation of the maximum likelihood adaptive procedure. MLP comes with a graphical interface, and it is provided with several built-in, classic psychoacoustics experiments ready to use at a mouse click.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amitay, S., Irwin, A., Hawkey, D. J. C., Cowan, J. A., & Moore, D. R. (2006). A comparison of adaptive procedures for rapid and reliable threshold assessment and training in naive listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 1616–1625.
Amitay, S., Irwin, A., & Moore D. R. (2006). Discrimination learning induced by training with identical stimuli. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 1446–1448. doi:10.1038/nn1787
Baker, R. J., & Rosen, S. (1998). Minimizing the boredom by maximising likelihood: Efficient estimation of masked threshold. British Journal of Audiology, 32, 104–105.
Baker, R. J., & Rosen, S. (2001). Evaluation of maximum likelihood threshold estimation with tone in noise masking. British Journal of Audiology, 35, 43–52.
Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436.
Fechner, G. T. (1889). Elemente der Psychophysik (2nd ed.). Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel.
Florentine, M., Buus, S., & Geng, W. (2000). Toward a clinical procedure for narrowband gap detection: I. A psychophysical procedure. Audiology, 39, 161–167.
García-Pérez, M. A., & Alcalá-Quintana, R. (2005). Sampling plans for fitting psychometric function. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 8, 256–289.
Green, D. M. (1990). Stimulus selection in adaptive psychophysical procedures. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 87, 2662–2674. doi:10.1121/1.399058
Green, D. M. (1993). A maximum-likelihood method for estimating thresholds in a yes-no task. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 93, 2096–2105. doi:10.1121/1.406696
Green, D. M. (1995). Maximum-likelihood procedures and the inattentive observer. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 3749–3760. doi:10.1121/1.412390
Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
Gu, X., & Green, D. M. (1994). Further studies of a maximum likelihood yes-no procedure. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 96, 93–101. doi:10.1121/1.410378
Hall, J. L. (1968). Maximum-likelihood sequential procedure for estimation of psychometric functions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 44, 370.
Kaernbach, C. (1991). Simple adaptive testing with the weighted up-down method. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 227–229.
Kidd, G. R., Watson, C. S., & Gygi, B. (2007). Individual differences in auditory abilities. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 122, 418–435.
Leek, M. R. (2001). Adaptive procedures in psychophysical research. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 1279–1292.
Leek, M. R., Dubno, J. R., He, N.-J., & Ahlstrom, J. B. (2000). Experience with a yes-no single-interval maximum-likelihood procedure. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 2674–2684.
Levitt, H. (1971). Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 49, 467–477.
Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437–442.
Pentland, A. (1980). Maximum likelihood estimation: The best PEST. Perception & Psychophysics, 28, 377–379.
Saberi, K., & Green, D. M. (1997). Evaluation of maximum-likelihood estimators in nonintensive auditory psychophysics. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 867–876.
Schlauch, R. S., & Rose, R. M. (1990). Two-, three-, and four-interval forced-choice staircase procedures: Estimator bias and efficiency. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88, 732–740. doi:10.1121/1.399776
Simpson, W. A. (1989). The step method: A new adaptive psychophysical procedure. Perception & Psychophysics, 45, 572–576.
Stanislaw, H., & Todorov, N. (1999). Calculation of signal detection theory measures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 137–149.
Stevens, S. S. (1957). On the psychophysical law. Psychological Review, 64, 153–181. doi:10.1037/h0046162
Stevens, S. S., & Galanter, E. H. (1957). Ratio scales and category scales for a dozen perceptual continua. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 377–411. doi:10.1037/h0043680
Taylor, M. M., & Creelman, C. D. (1967). PEST: Efficient estimates on probability functions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 41, 782–787.
Treutwein, B. (1995). Adaptive psychophysical procedures. Vision Research, 35, 2503–2522. doi:10.1016/0042-6989%2895%2900016-S
von Bekesy, G. (1947). A new audiometer. Acta Otolaryngology, 35, 411–422.
Watson, A. B., & Pelli, D. G. (1983). QUEST: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method. Perception & Psychophysics, 33, 113–120.
Wichmann, F. A., & Hill, N. J. (2001). The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 1293–1313.
Wright, B. A., Lombardino, L. J., King, W. M., Puranik, C. S., Leonard, L. M., & Merzenich, M. M. (1997). Deficits in auditory temporal and spectral resolution in language-impaired children. Nature, 387, 176–178. doi:10.1038/387176a0
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grassi, M., Soranzo, A. MLP: A MATLAB toolbox for rapid and reliable auditory threshold estimation. Behavior Research Methods 41, 20–28 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.1.20
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.1.20