Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Zooplankton community changes between forest and meadow sections in small headwater streams, NW Poland

  • Section Zoology
  • Published:
Biologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Headwater streams are important resources in production of organic matter, but zooplankton of headwater streams has rarely been studied. In the present study spatial changes in zooplankton communities between upper headwater forest section and downstream meadow section of four small streams were examined (NW Poland). The environmental conditions of stream riparian zone, e.g., the presence of leaf litter, pools, slackwaters and wetlands had a great influence on the spatial changes in zooplankton. Low gradient of stream bed, longer water residence time and larger surfaces of wetlands and slackwaters also positively affected zooplankton communities, especially in the meadow section. Along the streams, from the stream headwater to the downstream-meadow section, significant spatial changes in zooplankton communities were observed. Significantly higher number of taxa and density of zooplankton were observed in meadow sections than in headwater forest sections. In the forest sections, there was a definite domination of benthic and littoral rotifers in the zooplankton composition, while in the meadow sections, planktonic rotifers dominated. Cladocerans were observed only in downstream meadow section; two littoral species Coronatella rectangula and Peracantha truncata and one planktonic Daphnia magna which probably were washed from close pools of small stagnant water bodies. Copepods were noted along the entire length of streams. The occasional presence of planktonic rotifers in the forest section was probably caused by their washout from a few small stagnant water bodies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allan J.D. 1998. Ekologia wód płynących [Stream Ecology. Structure and Function of Running Waters]. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN S.A., Warszawa, 450 pp. ISBN: 83-01-12535-7

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu B.K. & Pick F.R. 1996. Factors regulating phytoplankton and zooplankton biomass in temperate rivers. Limnol. Oceanogr. 41(7): 1572–1577.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baranyi C., Hein T., Holarek C., Keckeis S. & Schiemer F. 2002. Zooplankton biomass and community structure in a Danube river floodplain system: effects of hydrology. Freshwater Biol. 47(3): 473–482. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00822.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Böhmer J., Zenker A., Ackermann B. & Kappus B. 2001. Macrozoobenthos communities and biocoenotic assessment of ecological status in relation to degree of human impact in small streams in southwest Germany. J. Aquat. Ecosyst. Stress Recov. 8(3/4): 407–419. DOI: 10.1023/A:1012987921434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell C.E. 2002. Rainfall events and downstream drift of microcrustacean zooplankton in a Newfoundland boreal stream. Can. J. Zool. 80(6): 997–1003. DOI: 10.1139/Z02-077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casper F.C. & Thorp J.H. 2007. Diel and lateral patterns of zooplankton distribution in the St. Lawrence River. River Res. Applic. 23(1): 73–85. DOI: 10.1002/rra.966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerbin S., Van Donk E. & Gulati R.D. 2007. The influence of Myriophyllum verticillatum and artificial plants on some life history parameters of Daphnia magna. Aquat. Ecol. 41(2): 263–271. DOI: 10.1007/s10452-007-9091-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang K.H., Doi H., Imai H., Gunji F. & Nakano S.I. 2008. Longitudinal changes in zooplankton distribution below a reservoir outfall with reference to river planktivory. Limnology 9(2): 125–133. DOI: 10.1007/s10201-008-0244-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins K.W., Merrit R.W. & Andrade P.C.N. 2005. The use of invertebrate functional groups to characterize ecosystem attributes in selected streams and rivers in south Brazil. Stud. Neotrop. Fauna E. 40(1): 69–89. DOI: 10.1080/01650520400025720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins K.W., Minshall W.G., Sedell J.R, Cushing C.E. & Petersen R.C. 1984. Stream ecosystem theory. Verh. Int. Verein. Limnol. 22: 1818–1827.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czerniawski R. 2012. Spatial pattern of potamozooplankton community of the slowly flowing fishless stream in relation to abiotic and biotic factors. Pol. J. Ecol. 60(2): 323–338.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Czerniawski R. & Domagała J. 2010. Similarities in zooplankton community between River Drawa and its two tributaries (Polish part of River Odra). Hydrobiologia 638(1): 137–149. DOI: 10.1007/s10750-009-0036-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czerniawski R. & Domagała J. 2012. Potamozooplankton communities in three different outlets from mesotrophic lakes located in lake-river system. Oceanol. Hydrobiol. St. 41(1): 46–56. DOI: 10.2478/s13545-012-0006-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czerniawski R. & Pilecka-Rapacz M. 2011. Summer zooplankton in small rivers in relation to selected conditions. Cent. Eur. J. Biol. 6(4): 659–674. DOI: 10.2478/s11535-011-0024-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czerniawski R., Pilecka-Rapacz M. & Domagała J. 2007. Macrofauna of three small streams as a prospective food reservoir for juvenile salmonids. Acta Sci. Pol. Piscaria. 6(3–4): 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodson S.I., Newman A.L., Will-Wolf S., Alexander M.L., Woodford M.P. & Van Egeren S. 2009. The relationship between zooplankton community structure and lake characteristics in temperate lakes (Northern Wisconsin, USA). J. Plankton Res. 31(1): 93–100. DOI: 10.1093/plankt/fbn095

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ebert D. 2005. Ecology, Epidemiology, and Evolution of Parasitism in Daphnia. Bethesda (MD), National Center for Biotechnology Information (US), 98 pp. ISBN-10: 1-932811-06-0

    Google Scholar 

  • Ejsmont-Karabin J. & Kruk M. 1998. Effects of contrasting land use on free-swimming rotifer communities of streams in Masurian Lake District, Poland. Hydrobiologia 387/388: 241–249. DOI: 10.1023/A:1017081407452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ejsmont-Karabin J., Węgleńska T. & Wiśniewski R.J. 1993. The effect of water flow rate on zooplankton and its role in phosphorus cycling in small impoundments. Water Sci. Tech. 28(6): 35–43.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harding J.P. & Smith W.A. 1974. A Key to the British Freshwater Cyclopid and Calanoid Copepods. Freshwater Biological Association, Scientific publication No. 18, 2nd Ed., Far Sawrey, Cumbria, 54 pp. ISBN: 0900386207

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudec I. 2010. Fauna Slovenska (3). Anomopoda, Ctenopoda, Haplopoda, Onychopoda (Crustacea: Branchiopoda) [Fauna of Slovakia (3). Anomopoda, Ctenopoda Haplopoda, Onychopoda (Crustacea: Branchiopoda)]. VEDA, Vydavateľstvo Slovenskej Akademie Vied, Bratislava, 496 pp. ISBN: 978-80-224-1141-7

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphries P., Cook R.A., Richardson A.J. & Serafini L.G. 2006. Creating a disturbance: manipulating slackwaters in a lowland river. River Res. Applic. 22(5): 525–542. DOI: 10.1002/rra.920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchens J.J. & Wallace J.B. 2002. Ecosystem linkages between southern Appalachian headwater streams and their banks: leaf litter breakdown and invertebrate assemblages. Ecosystems 5(1): 80–91. DOI: 10.1007/s10021-001-0057-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jack J.D. & Thorp J.H. 2002. Impact of fish predation on an Ohio River zooplankton community. J. Plankton Res. 24(2): 119–127. DOI: 10.1093/plankt/24.2.119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kobayashi T., Shiel R.J., Gibbs P. & Dixon P.I. 1998. Freshwater zooplankton in the Hawkesbury-Nepean River: comparison of community structure with other rivers. Hydrobiologia 377(1–3): 133–145. DOI: 10.1023/A:1003240511366

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kruglova A.N. 2008. Planktonic fauna of small salmon rivers in the Kola Peninsula. Inland Water Biol. 1(3): 8–13. DOI: 10.1134/S1995082908030024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuczyńska-Kippen N. & Nagengast B. 2006. The influence of the spatial structure of hydromacrophytes and differentiating habitat on the structure of rotifer and cladoceran communities. Hydrobiologia 559(1): 203–212. DOI: 10.1007/s10750-005-0867-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutikova L.A. 1970. Kolovratki Fauny SSSR (Rotatoria). Podklass Eurotatoria (otryad Ploimida, Monimotrochida, Paedotrochida). Opredeliteli po Faune [Rotifer fauna of the USSR. Keys to the fauna of the USSR]. No. 104, L. Nauka, Leningrad, 744 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lair N. 2006. A review of regulation mechanisms of metazoan plankton in riverine ecosystems: aquatic habitat versus biota. River Res. Applic. 22(5): 567–593. DOI: 10.1002/rra.923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza-Lera C., Larrańaga A., Pérez J., Descals E., Martínez A., Moya O., Arostegui I. & Pozo J. 2012. Headwater reservoirs weaken terrestrial-aquatic linkage by slowing leaf-litter processing in downstream regulated reaches. River Res. Applic. 28(1): 13–22 DOI: 10.1002/rra.1434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen D., Watson G. & Petrie R. 2005. Microfaunal communities in three lowland rivers under differing regimes Hydrobiologia 543(1): 101–111. DOI: 10.1007/s10750-004-6946-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ning N.S.P., Nielsen D.L., Paul W.L., Hillman T.J. & Suter P.J. 2010. Microinvertebrate dynamics in riverine slackwater and mid-channel habitats in relation to physico-chemical parameters and food availability. River Res. Applic. 26: 279–296. DOI: 10.1002/rra.1266

    Google Scholar 

  • Oksanen J. 2006. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Communities in R: vegan tutorial, 39 pp. http://ocw.um.es/ciencias/geobotanica/otros-recursos-1/documentos/vegantutorial.pdf (accessed 09.09.2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennak R.W. 1943. Limnological variables in a Colorado mountain stream. Am. Midl. Nat. 29(1): 186–199.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips E.C. 1995. Comparison of the zooplankton of a lake and stream in Northwest Arkansas. J. Freshwater Ecol. 10(4): 337–341. DOI: 10.1080/02705060.1995.9663456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirov R. & Buchen I. 2004. The dichotomous oxyregulatory behaviour of the planktonic crustacean Daphnia magna. J. Exp. Biol. 207: 683–696. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.00812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radwan S. (ed.) 2004. Fauna Slodkowodna Polski, Wrotki (Rotifera) [The freshwater fauna of Poland, Rotifers (Rotifera)] Zeszyt 32, Polskie Towarzystwo Hydrobiologiczne, Uniwersytet Łódzki. Oficyna Wydawnicza Tercja, Łódź, 448 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricci C. & Balsamo M. 2000. The biology and ecology of lotic rotifers and gastrotrichs. Freshwater Biol. 44(1): 15–28. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.2000.00584.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson W.B. 1992. Microcrustacea in flowing water: experimental analysis of washout times and a field test. Freshwater Biol. 28(2): 217–230. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.1992.tb00578.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rybak, J.I. & Błędzki, L.A. 2010. Slodkowodne skorupiaki planktonowe. Klucz do oznaczania [Freshwater planktonic crustaceans. The identification key]. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, Warszawa, 366 pp. ISBN: 978-83-235-0738-3

    Google Scholar 

  • Rzoska J. 1976. Zooplankton of the Nile system, pp. 333–343. In: Rzoska J. (ed.), The Nile, Biology of an Ancient River, Junk, The Hague, 418 pp. ISBN: 978-94-010-1565-3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schram M.D., Brown A.V. & Jackson D.C. 1990. Diel and seasonal drift of zooplankton in a headwater stream. Am. Midl. Nat. 123(1): 135–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schram M.D., Gunter J.M. & Engle D.B. 1998. Diurnal vertical distribution and drift of zooplankton in an Ozark headwater stream pool. J. Freshwater Ecol. 13: 47–54. DOI: 10.1080/02705060.1998.9663590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwerdtfeger F. 1975. Ökologie der Tiere. Band 3: Synökologie. Paul Parey Verlag, Hamburg-Berlin, 678 pp. ISBN: 3-490-07318-5

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith F., Brown A.V., Pope M. & Michael J.L. 2001. Benthic meiofauna responses to five harvest methods. Hydrobiologia 464(1–3): 9–15. DOI: 10.1023/A:1013933416040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statzner B. 1987. Characteristics of lotic ecosystems and consequences for future research direction, pp. 365–390. In: Schulze E.-D. & Zwölfer H. (eds), Potentials and Limitations of Ecosystem Analysis, Ecological Studies, Vol. 61, Analysis and Synthesis, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 435 pp. ISBN: 3-540-17138-X

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Statzner B. & Higler B. 1985. Questions and comments on the River Continuum Concept. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 42(5): 1038–1044. DOI: 10.1139/f85-129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swan C.M. & Palmer M.A. 2000. What drives small-scale spatial patterns in lotic meiofauna communities? Freshwater Biol. 44(1): 109–121. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.2000.00587.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Šporka F. & Krno I. 2003. Benthic invertebrates and metabolism of West Carpathian (Slovakia) rivers. Int. Rev. Hydrobiol. 88(3–4): 274–283. DOI: 10.1002/iroh.200390024

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor B.E. 1980. Size-selective predation on zooplankton, pp. 377–387. In: Kerfoot W.C. (ed.), Evolution and Ecology of Zooplankton Communities, American Society of Limnology and Oceanography Special Symposium 3., Univ. Press of New England, Hanover, New Hampshire, 793 pp. ISBN-10: 0874511801, ISBN-13: 978-0874511802

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorp J.H., Thoms M.C. & Delong M.D. 2006. The riverine ecosystem synthesis: biocomplexity in river networks across space and time. River Res. Applic. 22(2): 123–147. DOI: 10.1002/rra.901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todd C.S. & Stewart K.W. 1985. Food habits and dietary overlap of non-game insectivorous fishes in Flint Creek, Oklahoma, a western Ozark foothills stream. Great Basin Naturalist 45(4): 721–733.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Damme K. & Dumont H.J. 2008. Further division of Alona Baird, 1843: separation and position of Coronatella Dybowski & Grochowski and Ovalona gen. in. (Crustacea: Cladocera). Zootaxa 1960: 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vannote R.L., Minshall G.W., Cumminis K.W., Sedell J.R. & Cushing C.E. 1980. The River Continuum Concept. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 37(1): 130–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vranovský M. 1995. The effect of current velocity upon the biomass of zooplankton in the River Danube side arms. Biologia 50: 461–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagler E. 1937. Klasse: Crustacea (Krebstiere), pp. 1–24. In: Brohmer P., Ehrmann P. & Ulmer G. (eds), Die Tierwelt Mitteleeuropas, II, 2a, Leipzig, 224 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walks D.J. & Cyr H. 2004. Movement of plankton through lakestream systems. Freshwater Biol. 49(6): 745–759. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2004.01220.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace J.B & Eggert S.L. 2009. Terrestial and longitudinal linkages of headwater streams, pp. 1–43. In: Canaan Valley and its Environs: A Lanscape Heritage Celebration, sponsored by Canaan Valley Institute, Davis, West Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward J.V., Robinson C.T. & Tockner K. 2002. Applicabity of ecological theory to riverine ecosystems. Verh. Int. Verein. Limnol. 28: 443–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson S.C., Nielsen D., Quinn G.P. & Gawne B. 2011. The influence of leaf litter on zooplankton in floodplain wetlands: changes resulting from river regulation. Freshwater Biol. 56(12): 2432–2447. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2011.02665.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welker M. & Walz N. 1998. Can mussels control the plankton in rivers? A planktological approach applying a Lagrangian sampling strategy. Limnol. Oceanogr. 43(5): 753–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winner J.M. 1975. Zooplankton, pp. 155–169. In: Whitton B.A. (eds), River Ecology, University of California Press, Berkeley, 725 pp. ISBN: 0 63209740 X

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou S., Tang T., Wu N., Fu X. Zhou S., Tang T., Wu N., Fu X. & Cai Q. 2008. Impact of small dam on Riverine zooplankton. Int. Rev. Hydrobiol. 93(3): 297–311. DOI: 10.1002/iroh.200711038

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of General Zoology, University of Szczecin, ul. Z. Felczaka 3 C, 71-412, Szczecin, Poland

    Robert Czerniawski

Authors
  1. Robert Czerniawski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Czerniawski.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Czerniawski, R. Zooplankton community changes between forest and meadow sections in small headwater streams, NW Poland. Biologia 68, 448–458 (2013). https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-013-0170-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-013-0170-x

Key words

Search

Navigation