Abstract
Drug eruptions are among the most common adverse drug reactions, affecting approximately 3% of hospitalised patients. Although the rate of severe cutaneous adverse reactions to medications is low, these reactions can affect anyone who takes medication, and can result in death or disability. Two general patterns can be distinguished, depending on the type of onset of these cutaneous adverse drug reactions: acute or chronic. Acute-onset events are usually rather specific cutaneous ‘syndromes’ that constitute emergencies and should therefore be promptly recognised and treated, while chronic-onset events often present as dermatological diseases. The challenge is therefore to recognise the drug aetiology in front of a ‘classical’ dermatosis such as acne, lichen or pemphigus. Therefore, clinicians should carefully evaluate the signs or symptoms of all adverse reactions thought to be drug related, and discontinue the offending agent when feasible.
Erythematous drug eruptions are the most frequent and less severe acute immune drug-induced rashes, and are sometimes difficult to differentiate from viral eruptions. On the other hand, acute urticaria and angioedema are sometimes life-threatening eruptions for which a drug aetiology must be investigated. Photosensitivity, vasculitis and skin necrosis belong to the acute onset reactions, which are not always drug-induced, in contrast to fixed drug eruptions. The early recognition of acute generalised exanthematous pustulosis, DRESS (drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms) syndrome, Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis are of high importance because of the specific mechanisms involved and the different prognosis of each of these diseases. Chronic onset drug-induced disorders include pigmentary changes, drug-induced autoimmune bullous diseases, lupus, pseudo lymphoma and acneiform eruptions; these are discussed, along with specific data on drug-induced hair and nail disorders.
As the disorders are numerous, the mechanisms and the drugs involved in the development of these various reactions are multiple. The list of drugs discussed in relation to the different disorders are as accurate as possible at the time of preparation of this review, but will need updating as new drugs emerge onto the market. We emphasize the clinical recognition, pathophysiology and treatment of skin, hair and nail adverse drug reactions, and the role of each doctor involved in the management of these patients in the notification of the adverse drug reaction to health authorities, using the minimal requirement for notification proposed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lazarou J, Pomeranz BH, Covey PN. Incidence of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients: a meta analysis of prospective studies. JAMA 1998; 279: 1200–5
Arndt KA, Jick H. Rates of cutaneous reactions to drug: a report from the Boston Collaborative Drug Surveillance Program. JAMA 1976; 235: 918–23
Hunziker T, Künzi U, Braunschweig S, et al. Comprehensive hospital drug monitoring (CHDM): adverse skin reactions, a 20-year survey. Allergy 1997; 52: 388–93
Caranasos GJ, May FE, Stewart RB, et al. Drug-associated deaths of medical inpatients. Arch Intern Med 1976; 136: 872–5
Knowles SR, Uetrecht J, Shear NH. Idiosyncratic drug reactions: the reactive metabolite syndromes. Lancet 2000; 356: 1587–91
Pichler WJ. Delayed drug hypersensitivity reactions. Ann Intern Med 2003; 139: 683–93
Roujeau J-C, Stern RS. Severe cutaneous adverse reactions to drugs. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 1272–85
Bayard PJ, Berger TG, Jacobson MA. Drug hypersensitivity reactions and human immunodeficiency virus disease. J Acquired Immune Defic Syndrome 1992; 5: 1237–57
Floret D. Clinical aspects of streptococcal and staphylococcal toxinic diseases. Arch Pediatr 2001; 8 Suppl. 4: 762S–8S
Gruchalla RS, Pirmohamed M. Clinical practice: antibiotic allergy. N Engl J Med 2006; 354: 601–9
Roujeau JC. Clinical heterogeneity of drug hypersensitivity. Toxicology 2005; 209: 123–9
Mathelier-Fusade P. Drug-induced urticarias. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 2006; 30: 19–23
Kozel MM, Mekkes JR, Bossuyt PM, et al. The effectiveness of a history-based diagnostic approach in chronic urticaria and angioedema. Arch Dermatol 1998; 134: 1575–80
Hedner T, Samuelsson O, Lunde H, et al. Angio-oedema in relation to treatment with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors. BMJ 1992; 304: 941–6
Moore DE. Drug-induced cutaneous photosensitivity: incidence, mechanism, prevention and management. Drug Saf 2002; 25: 345–72
Crowson AN, Mihm Jr MC, Magro CM. Cutaneous vasculitis: a review. J Cutan Pathol 2003; 30: 161–73
Jorg I, Fenyvesi T, Harenberg J. Anticoagulant-related skin reactions. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2002; 1: 287–94
Beylot C, Bioulac P, Doutre MS. Acute generalized exanthematic pustuloses (four cases) [in French]. Ann Dermatol Venereol 1980; 107: 37–48
Sidoroff A, Halevy S, Bavinck JN, et al. Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP): a clinical reaction pattern. J Cutan Pathol 2001; 28: 113–9
Britschgi M, Steiner UC, Schmid S, et al. T-cell involvement in drug-induced acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis. J Clin Invest 2001; 107: 1433–41 1029
Roujeau JC, Bioulac-Sage P, Bourseau C, et al. Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis: analysis of 63 cases. Arch Dermatol 1991; 127: 1333–8
Knowles SR, Shapiro LE, Shear NH. Anticonvulsivant hypersensitivity syndrome: incidence, prevention and management. Drug Saf 1999; 21: 489–501
Callot V, Roujeau J-C, Bagot M, et al. Drug-induced pseudolymphoma and hypersensitivity syndrome: two different clinical entities. Arch Dermatol 1996; 132: 1315–21
Shear NH, Spielberg SP. Anticonvulsant hypersensitivity syndrome: in vitro assessment of risk. J Clin Invest 1988; 82: 1826–32
Maguire JH, Wettrell G, Rane A. Apparently normal phenytoin metabolism in a patient with phenytoin-induced rash and lymphadenopathy. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1987; 24: 554–7
Choquet-Kastylevsky G, Intrator L, Chenal C, et al. Increased levels of interleukin 5 are associated with the generation of eosinophilia in drug induced hypersensitivity syndrome. Br J Dermatol 1998; 139: 1026–32
Descamps V, Valance A, Edlinger C, et al. Association of herpesvirus 6 infection in drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms. Arch Dermatol 2001; 137: 301–4
Begon E, Roujeau JC. Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms. Ann Dermatol Venereol 2004; 131: 293–7
Kauppinen K, Stubb S. Fixed eruptions: causative drugs and challenge tests. Br J Dermatol 1985; 112: 575–8
Rzany B, Mockenhaupt M, Baur S, et al. Epidemiology of erythema exsudativum multiforme majus (EEMM), Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) in Germany (1990–1992): structure and results of a population based registry. J Clin Epidemiol 1996; 49: 769–73
Mockenhaupt M, Norgauer J. Cutaneous adverse drug reactions: Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis. Allergy Clin Immunol Int 2002; 14: 143–50
Saíag P, Caumes E, Chosidow O, et al. Drug-induced toxic epidermal necrolysis (Lyell syndrome) in patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus. J Am Acad Dermatol 1992; 26: 567–74
Paul C, Wolkenstein P, Adle H, et al. Apoptosis as a mechanism of keratinocytes death in toxic epidermal necrolysis. Br J Dermatol 1996; 134: 710–4
Viard I, Wehrli P, Bullani R, et al. Inhibition of toxic epidermal necrolysis by blockade of CD95 with human intravenous immunoglobulin. Science 1998; 282: 490–3
Wolkenstein P, Latarget J, Roujeau JC, et al. Randomised comparison of thalidomide versus placebo in toxic epidermal necrolysis. Lancet 1998; 352: 1586–9
Wolkenstein P, Charue D, Laurent P, et al. Metabolic predisposition to cutaneous adverse drug reactions: role in toxic epidermal necrolysis caused by sulphonamides and anticonvulsants. Arch Dermatol 1995; 131: 544–51
Chung WH, Hung SI, Hong HS, et al. Medical genetics: a marker for Stevens Johnson syndrome. Nature 2004; 428: 486
Hung SI, Chung WH, Liou LB, et al. HLA-B*5801 allele as a genetic marker for severe cutaneous adverse reactions caused by allopurinol. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2005; 102: 4134–9
Bastuji-Garin S, Rzany B, Stern RS, et al. Clinical classification of cases of toxic epidermal necrolysis, Stevens-Johnson syndrome and erythema multiforme. Arch Dermatol 1993; 129: 92–6
Auquier-Dunant A, Mockenhaupt M, Naldi L, et al. Correlations between clinical patterns and causes of erythema multiforme majus, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, and toxic epidermal necrolysis: results of an international prospective study. SCAR Study Group. Arch Dermatol 2002; 138: 1019–24
Bastuji-Garin S, Fouchard N, Bertocchi M, et al. SCORTEN: a severity-of-illness score for toxic epidermal necrolysis. J Invest Dermatol 2000; 115: 149–53
Guegan S, Bastuji-Garin S, Poszepczynska-Guigne E, et al. Performance of the SCORTEN during the first five days of hospitalization to predict the prognosis of epidermal necrolysis. J Invest Dermatol 2006; 126: 272–6
Rabelink NM, Brakman M, Maartense E, et al. Erythema multiforme vs Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: an important diagnostic distinction. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2003; 147: 2089–94
Roujeau JC. Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis are severity variants of the same disease which differs from erythema multiforme. J Dermatol 1997; 24: 726–9
Bachot N, Revuz J, Roujeau JC. Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment for Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: a prospective noncomparative study showing no benefit on mortality or progression. Arch Dermatol 2003; 139: 33–6
Roujeau JC, Kelly JP, Naldi L, et al. Medication use and the risk of Stevens-Johnson syndrome or toxic epidermal necrolysis. N Engl J Med 1995; 333: 1600–7
Wintroub BU, Stern R. Cutaneous drug reactions: pathogenesis and clinical classification. J Am Acad Dermatol 1985; 13: 167–79
Susser WS, Whitaker-Worth DL, Grant Kels JM. Mucocutaneous reactions to chemotherapy. J Am Acad Dermatol 1999; 40: 367–98
Brenner S, Bialy-Golan A, Ruocco V. Drug-induced pemphigus. Clin Dermatol 1998; 16: 393–7
Ruocco V, Sacerdoti G. Pemphigus and bullous pemphigoid due to drugs. Int J Dermatol 1991; 30: 307–12
Bastuji-Garin S, Joly P, Picard-Dahan C, et al. Drugs associated with bullous pemphigoid: a case-control-study. Arch Dermatol 1996; 132: 272–6
Antonov D, Kazandjieva J, Etugov D, et al. Drug-induced lupus erythematosus. Clin Dermatol 2004; 22: 157–66
Souteyrand P, d’Incan M, Parent S. Misleading of rare cutaneous drug reactions. Rev Prat 2000; 50: 1329–33
Robert C, Soria JC, Spatz A, et al. Cutaneous side-effects of kinase inhibitors and blocking antibodies. Lancet Oncol 2005; 6: 491–500
Pillans PI, Woods DJ. Drug-associated alopecia. Int J Dermatol 1995; 34: 149–58
Tosi A, Misciali C, Piraccini BM, et al. Drug-induced hair loss and hair growth: incidence, management and avoidance. Drug Saf 1994; 10: 310–7
Faivre S, Delbado C, Vera K, et al. Safety, pharmacokinetic, and antitumor activity of SU11248, a novel oral multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 25–35
Valeyrie L, Bastuji-Garin S, Revuz J, et al. Adverse cutaneous reactions to imatinib (STI571) in Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemias: a prospective study of 54 patients. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003; 48: 201–6
Ward HA, Russo GG, Shrum J. Cutaneous manifestations of antiretroviral therapy. J Am Acad Dermatol 2002; 46: 284–93
Piraccini BM, Tosti A. Drug-induced nail disorders: incidence, management and prognosis. Drug Saf 1999; 21: 187–201 1030
Hussain S, Anderson DN, Salvatti ME, et al. Onycholysis as a complication of systemic chemotherapy: report of five cases associated with prolonged weekly paclitaxel therapy and review of the literature. Cancer 2000; 88: 2367–71
Chen GY, Chen YH, Hsu MM, et al. Onychomadesis and onycholysis associated with capecitabine. Br J Dermatol 2001; 145: 521–2
Mehra A, Murphy RJ, Wilson BB. Idiopathic familial onychomadesis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2000; 43: 349–50
Blumental G. Paronychia and pyogenic granuloma-like lesions with isotretinoin. J Am Acad Dermatol 1984; 4: 677–8
Tosti A, Pirraccini BM, D’Antuono A, et al. Paronychia associated with antiretroviral therapy. Br J Dermatol 1999; 140: 1165–8
Chang GC, Yang TY, Chen KC, et al. Complications of therapy in cancer patients: case 1. Paronychia and skin hyperpigmentation induced by gefitinib in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22(22): 4646–8
Boucher KW, Davidson K, Mirakhur B, et al. Paronychia induced by cetuximab, an antiepidermal growth factor receptor antibody. J Am Acad Dermatol 2002; 47: 632–3
Rahav G, Maayan S. Nail pigmentation associated with zidovudine: a review and report of a case. Scan J Infect Dis 1992; 24: 557–61
Angeloni VL, Salasche SJ, Oriz R. Nail, skin and scleral pigmentation induced by minocycline. Cutis 1987; 40: 229–33
Dixit VB, Chaudhary SD, Jain VK. Clofazimine-induced nail changes. Indian J Lepr 1989; 61: 476–8
Acknowledgements
Dr Roujeau has been a consultant for Medimmune, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis, OM Pharma, Cephalon, Serono, Boehringer-Ingelheim, LFB and Merck, and has received grants from Sanofi-Aventis, Bayer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Novartis, Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, Servier and Wyeth. Drs Valeyrie-Allanore and Sassolas have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this review. No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this review.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Valeyrie-Allanore, L., Sassolas, B. & Roujeau, JC. Drug-Induced Skin, Nail and Hair Disorders. Drug-Safety 30, 1011–1030 (2007). https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018-200730110-00003
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018-200730110-00003